Holes Are Real!

If you are too shy they are like real partners; they are groovy and they do not like to mix with shy people. Another hole comes to you ask you to sit in a corner and talk together. You talk with something that does not exist out there. Or, rather, something that does not exist out there talks with you. It is your choice you can go and dance with them or sit and converse. Well, there are plenty of holes around to mix with. Remember that holes are as real as you. I did not mean allegory or symbolism. They need two factors to be realised. First a single individual and then an excited environment. You can arrange the ballroom with uniformed people and similar caps such that pictures taken from the ceiling do not reveal their sex and their individual features. From the left door enters a single; immediately from the right door enters a hole. You can take picture that he or she snatches the first partner at the side and left alone partner of the snatched dancer takes his next door dancer until at the other end, at the left door, a singled out partner becomes kicked out of the salon by the bouncer. When you enter as a single in the dancing room you already bring some discomfort with you as an excitement into the room, but this is not enough. Further excitement will come with the music. I had to add this small post to emphasise that the holes are real and as physically observable as humans in such an arrangement. They are actually invisible humans, perhaps a little heavier, if all the individuals in the room have equal shape and weight in a thought experiment.

Causality and the Holes?

I said holes in the dance floor break causality of events. It means that before stimulation comes response is there (do not confuse it with the response in anticipation of stimuli, which is actually causal). This might make you surprised since you know causality the most sacred knowledge of human. Even if you say there are experiments that break causality you implicitly have acknowledged causality. Those experiments are cause of the knowledge you get from the experiment. But wait a minute. We know that a low-pass filter, say in your radio, an ideal low pass filter breaks the causality. To have an ideal low pass filter your system should be on from infinite time ago; should be on before you switch it on. Hence, it is not realisable. You cannot build an ideal low pass filter and even if you build the best digital radio there always will be some noise mingled with the desired signal that you like to listen to, because the filters are not ideal at all. You can make a good filter but not an ideal one. We have a saying that "he is so groovy that dances before the music plays." Holes are that groovy. They are dancing before the guest enters the dancing room. They are there grooving and when the individual with no partner enters they attach to him. They wait until the environment becomes excited. They attach to you with the speed of infinity. This is their second breach of nature's law. It is believed that nothing can move faster than light. Well, some say that when you think about a galaxy one million light years away your thought flies with speeds much faster than the light. It is an allegory. You have that information in your mind and you retrieve it very fast; perhaps with the speed of light, and we do not know more than that. But the hole gets information of your presence and that you are left alone immediately; with speed of infinty. You cannot decide if the hole is already in the salon or it joined to you in the parking or if it was with you before any time from infinite time ago. Holes become your dancing partner if the environment becomes exited not when it is gelid. If you are too shy they are like real partners they do not come to you. Another hole comes to you ask you to sit in a corner and talk together. This bridges holes to psychoanalysis that I have selected as the name of this site.

More on Holes and on Dance Floor

You know the room is full of holes waiting to grab an unpaired individual, when excited. I said that already: One individual enters the party without his couple accompanying him. He has left alone. All couples are dancing. He is watching. Until the music becomes more exciting and more groovy, then couples "coupling" becomes loose and also the lone boy becomes excited towards rugged edge of the dancing people and grabs the next girl at the edge nearest to him. The girl's partner grabs one from the inner crowd and so on. We said, assume at the same time a lone girl enters from the diagonally opposite door and starts the same process. We said each one has got an opposite sex hole with them. Therefore we have two holes in the room: one girl and one boy. We said we can actually arrange experiments to take picture from them. We said they are not as groovy as others but a bit sluggish. And there will be a point in the middle that they reach together. Now all people are paired. What happens to our hole couples? They go and sit on chairs at a corner waiting if new singled out individual arrives. They have not names. They are not invited. They do not know how to dance. They do not have any acquaintances in the crowd. They do not have a body of flesh materialised. They are just nobody. They just wait for a lonely individual and an excited dance floor to start to groove. How many of them exists? There is no difference. Holes do not exist at all. You can say, many pairs, or just one or just none, until the floor becomes degenerated: If you invite fifty couple and forty of them come singled then with no genre of musics you are able to excite the dance floor.

Man in Panopticon

I have written frequently that my aim is not to prove the god and religion by using science. Modern science and the idea of god and religion as we know them are contradictory. I said that I do not mean that the idea of god is good for the psychological benefits of human and giving him comfort and insight for his daily behaviour or inspire and frighten him towards a better moral behaviour. Everything that you claim is so vast and vaguely understood by man that excludes me to commit. Each claim goes into the realm of dedicated scholarships of individuals and groups of people. Why should god sends his son or a messenger who has a very partial knowledge of human affairs let alone to help them to eternal salvage. Messiah only brings some news and some people could only believe him and mostly people could not believe except by conversion, by a sudden transformation of soul. I have shown the contradictory nature of these two discourse: science and religion. Hence, what is all that about the excitons and psychoanalysis? I want to show that there are things that are conceivable. I want to show that the idea of god and Satan is in the spectrum of human thoughts without creating a contradiction or using glib of preachers in bypassing and jumping over those contradictions. I want to show that if modern science tries in denying my argument it similarly has to jump and bypass its own contradictions. In this way I'll be able to demonstrate a unified outlook. Exciton is something in a spectrum - spectrum of artificial elements -  that has been created in a very unusual conditions. It is part of the nature but man cannot find it in the nature. On the other hand, I want to show that an instance of the language has been created by the modern man that puts locks and knots on the human mind and when the man tries to open it, that instance overpower the human mind and converts it to a new lock and knot such that when man believes that he is opening and opening he is sealing and locking and knotting. He makes the wall around his individuality thicker and thicker and imprison him in a prison that there is no escape for him but it is crystal clear and hurdle-less for intrusion of Satan and inflicting of pain, misery and hopelessness upon man. I want to show that we modern humans cannot and are not allowed to communicate with each other and when we do it, Satan assertively and immediately outreaches to us to punish us. This is the panopticon that some recent humans have recognised as the last retreat of humans into his loneliness.

Excitons and Psychoanalyst (2)

First, allow me to discuss exciton in nature. When you dope some impurity in a semiconductor material, inside the crystal structure of that material you can create an additional electron coupled with a lack of electron (a positive hole). They act like a Hydrogen atom: Hole is a light weight positive charge with a mass a little more than  mass of an electron. You can create many of these atoms. All modern electronics and lasers and LED's are working on this basis. There is a hope that you can create such an immense concentration of Excitons to turn them into a metallic form similar to metallic hydrogen. (Hydrogen is actually a metal with properties similar to lithium and sodium, but it shows those physical metalic properties, such as electrical conduction, under unbelievable pressure to keep its atom in a metallic structure.) Then there is a hope that you can increase concentration of doping to degenerate that metal into a superconductor (similar to super-conducting high temperature metallic hydrogen ); a superconductor inside a semiconductor. In that case it is possible to manufacture computer parts that do not need cooling and can work with a torch battery. They do it, though in fifty years. Then what is a hole in our ball room party? It does not exist on the dance floor as far as all dancers are paired. When there comes an unpaired individual, the dance floor becomes a little excited due to that presence, but not enough to create an Exciton, as far as the dance lattice remains stiffed due to a calm music. It should become excited by applying a more exciting music to the environment. When an unpaired individual enters then a hole is created. What is that? It is an effect due to presence of an unpaired one. It becomes created with speed of infinity (in nature we do not have speed more than speed of light, but that hole defies that postulate). It is non-causal: Hole is there before its cause enters the room. It is not the matter. It is somewhere. It is a spirit. You know the room is full of holes waiting to grab an unpaired individual, when excited.

Excitons and Psychoanalyst

In older posts, I described briefly about some modern observations in nature of chemical elements. I talked about anti-matter and artificial elements and nonperceivable elements such as muoniums. I left out one important case and that is the exciton. This element is created when nothingness becomes excited! It exists but in twilight of existence. What is the use of such thing in the nature. All you see right now in screen of your computer is due to such existence. Assume you are inviting equal numbers of girls and boys to a school ball. You expect people become paired when the band plays a cheek-to-cheek. what happens if a girl or a guy does not get their invitation card on-time. You are lacking a coupling place; some one remains alone. If you make the environment excited enough by changing the music to a more modern rhythm, the lonely person can snatch his/her couple from a pair and makes the other partner alone. The left alone individual can do the same with the nearest couple and this can create an additional observable commotion rippling over the dancing motions of people. There is an empty place for one missed individual but it seems as filled by the excitement. You can say one person is dancing with a bubble, with a "hole!" There is a couple there created by excitation, compensating the absent guest.They look as a natural couple similar to others. This "hole" dancer only is a bit more heavier and sluggish than all other dancers in turning and bending and other motions. You can create senarios and by taking snap shots from above the dance floor calculating weight of this invisible dancer. You can 'inject' a spare partner from opposite door of the ball room until two single dancers meet up in the centre of the room, the hole gets filled. Suddenly, all will have their partners, shout in relaxation and the excitement fades out; many scenarios, just "gedanken." The couple might win the fruit basket of the best dancers of the night and the umpire calls the "exciton couple" as the winner. Remains where is psychoanalysis in this discussion?

Why Psychoanalyst? (3)

Psychoanalysis, in its original advertisements of its founder, has touched a vast arena of human rituals and their relation with some phenomena seen in certain groups of humans, described as neurosis. Psychoanalysis in its endeavour to discover that had to investigate remote concepts such as totems, taboos, and the role of phallus and the role of the primitive ruler and the role of father in human societies. It explains ideas such as patricide and regicide and the feeling of guilt. As said ingenuity of the founder was not followed with an integration of his ideas in a more unified and honest approach of his advertisers. Do not make a mistake and do not accuse me that I am knowing him a prophet. Let me clear me. It is an analogy that I use. He was like a prophet, honestly advertising his findings as a scientist should, but his followers were like preachers who advertise a religion as a career to earn a sustenance of worldly values, some vehemently, some hopelessly, and some with no appetite at all. I said my talks about this branch of human knowledge has  as much use for me as my talks about proton and RNA. Messiah, is a defender, but not more than that. Messiah is not follower. Others are follower. Messiah is the balance and the gauge for others. Others are connections and nodes to connect to Him: not to connect anything to him, but to connect He to Him; to connect Man to Man, to connect the entire existence to existence. In first emergence's of human societies, we have family: mother, father, children and grandchildren, ruler, and an entity there: he is the witch, or medicine man, or something around this concept. There are details. For instance, father was not there similar to what we then had until now. Mother was. She was carrying the result of human regeneration and hence attachment was to her. Father could be anyone. Psychoanalyst discovered that the male child of human has a hidden tendency to eliminate his father. (Regretfully, later these novel ideas fell in the hands of brothel runners.) In place of father there was the uncle. This uncle was brother of mother. He was the mirror that could inspire the male child. Look! Pieces of puzzle are here. Abraham had no father, brought up by his uncle. Generations after generations people never asked why. But Abraham means father of people. He established fatherhood. His fatherhood established by many rituals that needs to be investigated. Moses had no father. You do not know the story in this way, none of you. His name shows that: Moses, taken from the water. Jesus had no father. His father was god. Next and the last one was also known as the "Mohammad the Waif" These stories later has been modified by the preachers to alter the life of these greatest unique personalities of humans to become similar to a spoiled prince or a hero of no value with many similar entities born everyday in a corner of the Earth.