tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-253669472024-03-06T23:44:07.849-08:00Messiah PsychoanalystTowards Understanding of BeyondsPeter Joneshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03192918305428815983noreply@blogger.comBlogger85125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25366947.post-77094740463964881222023-02-13T14:20:00.009-08:002023-05-03T08:23:50.343-07:00Essence of the Grand Unified Theory<p> I try to write down essence of a Grand Unified Theory that explains all phenomena regarding human behaviour, social or psychological. It also explains the appearance of seven abrahamic prophets. It interpretes the visions of these people whom are described in their holy books; people such as Job, David, Ezekiel, Daniel, Jesus Christ and Mohammed. </p><p>This theory is based on axioms. Those axioms takes us to a the theory. That theory needs verification . Verification is based on the observation of pathological cases. There is a grand verification test, too. We might explain that, as well.</p><p>Axioms:</p><p>1. There is a phenomenon defined here already as the "hole".</p><p>2. There is a phenomenon in nature as mind separate from body. Mind is here to stay.</p><p>3. We have good holes which is 'the mind' or 'I' who wants to stay and to be eternal.<br /></p><p>4. We have bad holes which are the enemy and want to annihilate the mind, the 'you'.<br /></p><p>3. Mind can communicate without any material means with other minds, in proximity better but also when far.</p><p>4. All humans are tuned to a unique universal 'frequency' and naturally are in unison and 'friendship'. That is, they have not hostility to each other and all respect the individual bubble of each human. Humans hear that tune all the time similar to a synchronising clock in the background.<br /></p><p>5. Bad holes are responsible for disturbing the tunes that humans hear. In this way the bad holes create animosity, enmity and hostility among humans.<br /></p><p>We recognise each other with communiating minds. We communicate without having to be connected through a physical means and medium. See cats recognise each other. even smaller 'brains' such as pigeons or crows or pinguins. cats know dogs are not cat even when the size of that dog to be smaller than the cat. They recognise another cat and approach each other with the well defined rituals they have naturally.<br /></p><p>Different dogs, with so many natural and artificial pedigrees, they recognise each other. They communicate with each other. <br /></p>Peter Joneshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03192918305428815983noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25366947.post-25524951859772585402017-10-23T03:14:00.002-07:002019-05-02T05:42:00.416-07:00Find Messiah<br />
Real Messiah does not come and tell you that he is the promised Messiah. Anti-Christ, the mind reader, comes and introduces Messiah. IT asks people to suffer Messiah. Then everyone recognises in his heart that the victim is the Messiah. He inflicts the wound on messiah but he feels and understands that it is himself who has been wounded. Because before he accepts the invitation of Anti-Christ, Anti-Christ sucks and removes the phallus of its accomplice. <br />
<br />
Anti-Christs makes its confederate blind in mind such that the abet to its crime becomes a robot who could not see Messiah. The accomplice could not hear the words of Messiah and has no compassion in his heart. Those wounds overwhelm the accomplice into a perpetual pain which is the same as the descend and fall of man from Garden of Eden into the hell.<br />
<br />
The accomplice of Devil gets a bad hole, a very bad hole instead of his phallus. He becomes Devil.<br />
<br />
From this point on as much the Christ tries to convince and chastise the accomplice, the injured man goes deeper in his blindness. There will be no remedy for him; no preach will guide his soul into the salvation.<br />
<br />
It remains if the antichrist has got any use for this army of phallus-less horde. The word "use"' has not a meaning for the antichrist; we should say what is the consequence of this phenomenon, instead. Devil gets nodal points to spread its spores of destruction.<br />
<br />
Remember the ants. There is an ant as the organ of reproduction in the colony and there are asexual ants similar to spread-moving organs who provide food and are specialised similar to an animal organ who have not any memory or independent brain. They only carry messages from the sexual organ.<br />
<br />
Similarly, the antichrist, though an asexual thing in the world of humans, but like an ant queen- the ant colony female organ, is to reproduce species of cruel, inhumane and enemy to humans, similar to itself. These nodal points are its children, its army of mindless asexual distributed scattered ant-like "antoids." They are children of Devil who are all evilness. They have lost their phallus copulating with Antichrist. Now they are in search to remedy their faults and suck and hunt the phalluses of other humans.<br />
<br />
In the same way that their own phallus could not cure the fault of the antichrist, the sucked and hunted phallus of others also would not be able to cure the fault of its army.<br />
<br />
I said that messiah sings the tune of the sanctuary, that is, the garden of Eden, and invites the soul of humans into the unity towards ascendance of mind as the final juice, essence and abstraction of material world. These nodal points of Antichrist disturb humans' hearts and prevent them to hear that sound and that song. They push humans into the hostility with self, with others, and with nature.<br />
<br />
The nodal points constantly send noise to disturb the tranquillity of humans and nature and invite them into the fear and self-destruction.<br />
<br />Peter Joneshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03192918305428815983noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25366947.post-75240892890160116612016-10-09T07:36:00.002-07:002017-08-15T06:37:49.747-07:00On Messiah Complex and Similar Issues<br />
<br />
Yes this could have been true: Messiah Complex. If you have carefully read and understood what I have put here then you already have got the idea of such 'complex.' People come and declare that they are the promised messiah.<br />
<br />
There are different classes of such people. Most of the time they are already from certain groups of preachers. They are familiar with books and teachings of the religions that they used to preach; they are sometimes very educated in those religions. <br />
<br />
They use debates about validity of their assertion by referencing to those educations. They go to the other preachers of the said religion trying to convince them that based of certain verses they are true and they are the promised one.<br />
<br />
They start to prove that the other preachers are ignorant, vile, pervert and for the earthly profits deny the acclaimed messiah his righteousness. <br />
<br />
What is the test of the other preachers to accept the claim of the candidate Messiah? It is the same things that claimant condemns. They ask him to fly, to go to war for them and in a breath defeat their enemies; to bring golds and foods from heaven. <br />
<br />
We are sure that no one can do any of theses things; otherwise, he would not come to preachers for any debate. He would not need any helping hand.<br />
<br />
Preachers say that for example, Jesus could walk on water. Well, did he do it in front of people? They say that they are positive about it. Then why only twelve people accepted him and thirteenth could not believe and betrayed him? <br />
<br />
People swarm and applaud magicians and illusionists for much more basic feats then why people killed Jesus Christ seeing his miracles.<br />
<br />
Followers of religions, after some debate to convince the claimant of his invalidity, or even without any debate, will kill him for blasphemy if the time and place allow them. They have done that with Jesus Christ, even though we believe that he is righteous.<br />
<br />
What if someone right now walks on the water in front of you and tells you that he is messiah or is from the god or such things. You won't believe him. Doctor tells someone that he dies if he continues taking salt with food. Some believe and some do not. <br />
<br />
Those who believe already have a belief in doctors by some conversion of 'heart.'<br />
<br />
(to be continued)Peter Joneshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03192918305428815983noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25366947.post-79902686941063806832016-04-01T01:17:00.003-07:002017-02-14T05:13:50.618-08:00Conscience and Mind Reader<br />
(This chapter is not conclusive in being exhaustive enough and will be expanded. However, keeps all propositions as put forward here.)<br />
I said bad holes begin from very weak instances of fear. And sometimes not even from the fear but from the fear camouflaged with other names such as being left alone, being tired, being curious which all are fears. See, we do not have anything as anger or shame or any other thing. We only have fear; that is, the protection of phallus. All the levels and shades of fear boils down to protection of phallus, to the reproduction of a copy of a human. <br />
<br />
In this modern time that I write people discuss if the man and women are biologically equal or as I have extended the idea of equality to the idea of being similar. I said in the chapter on <a href="http://www.messiahpsychoanalyst.org/Documents/Women.html">women</a> that they are equal but not similar. That proposition is sociological/biological. Ontologically we do not have a male human and a female human as separate entities to be able to describe their relation. Reproduction means creating an instance of a copy of a human. This is the reason that we have a half and half population of females and males.<br />
<br />
You are at a height; say, at the top of a cliff. You know that you might fall and lose the life. You become aware and cautious. A voice comes to your mind asks you that to relieve yourself from the fear; it calls you as its friend: "Friend, jump down!" The voice is your friend wants you not to be scared, wants you to be relieved. Now, it starts to blame you for not betraying yourself. Meanwhile you hear or rather you feel that there is a desire, an inclination a want of an unknown entity alien to you that likes to push you down. As you like to stay as you are here to stay you push that unknown entity back. Your fight begins. Then psychologists interpret it as the desire to self harming and self annihilation. Psychologists all are wrong. No one wants to self-harm.You are this side, side of yourself. But that voice is on the other side. We discover it when it becomes extreme and pathological; becomes far from normal experience of average population of humans. Pathology shows that certain people, known as the voice hearer, describe that thing in the form of a voice as commanding them. They hear a very cruel, inhumane voice with no feeling with no reason that ask them to annihilate themselves.<br />
<br />
Most of people tolerate that command and safely pass the height. Some people do that due to their life style or just train themselves as pleasure such that the voice completely becomes overpowered and never could be heard.<br />
<br />
Some people a small portion of population become on the other hand so overpowered that avoid any height or so terrified that they might faint or scream and escape. See, the spectrum is not on a two dimensional line. Here just as an example we found three directions. One who climbs up a 100 meter tower to tighten a screw. One who succumbs to command and throw themselves down. One who totally avoid. Most of population behave moderately between these extremes. Many constantly think about such a situation. Many never think. One who obeys the command of the voice has got a very big bad hole that has occupied most of his existence. He constantly feels at the verge of the cliff and hears the relieving command of the enemy for self-annihilation. He is feeble and cannot overpower that malicious voice. He confuses the voice with his own self. He believes in voice and knows it good and helpful. He recognises the voice as something Devine and his own psyche as something bad.<br />
<br />
This was for a natural situation. Now, lets discuss something known as bad among humans. Is stealing bad? There is no answer to this question. You do not know anything as belong-ness in nature. If one gets a piece of bread in his hand and you are hungry you attack him and take it and eat it except that he has got enough power to repel you. When you are not hungry you have no motive to take it. You won't notice he is having a bread in his hand. <br />
<br />
In our society if you take a candy from a child and eat it then when you go home and want to sleep a voice starts to blame you. Your "conscience" blames you. You are a conscientious person as modern people now say. You can't sleep. Without further ado this is the same voice that asks you to jump and relieve yourself from the fear of falling. The voice asks you to betray yourself go and surrender to police and feel relief. Conscience have more plans for you after that surrender. Why it is the same voice. As people train themselves to go to the top of the tower, people can silence the voice for taking the candy from the children. In kindergartens you frequently can find staff who pilfer candy bars that children bring from home for their midday snack. Those staff sleep comfortably at nights.<br />
<br />
Between that situation in nature that you were allowed to take the bread from the weaker human without having any qualm to the situation that you could not sleep for stealing the candy bar there are immense layers of social structure fears and socialisation:<br />
<br />
<span class="st">"Thou shalt <em><strong><span style="color: #6a6a6a;">not steal</span></strong></em>"</span><br />
<br />
This command is from the good hole. It is from out of your head, from another human, but still you do not know what is the 'stealing' in above command. <br />
<br />
Assume, you were hungry and more powerful and took the bread from the weaker who had that or had earned it. <br />
<br />
Now, consider that you were not hungry, but took the candy bar from a child just because you liked a dainty snack. <br />
<br />
The voice inside your head, the bad hole, does not recognise the difference. <br />
<br />
How? You are hungry and have earned a bread then you see some one who can't earn and he begs you for that bread. Either you give it to him or you deprive him; in both cases, the voice blames you.<br />
<br />
If you do not give then at the time that the voice blames you, at that time you might think that it is "your" conscience as something on the side of or as the defender of good actions. <br />
<br />
If you give the bread then the voice blames you that "why when you are in need you give the result of your toil to someone who is lazy." It is enough that you put your head on the bed while you are hungry then the voice comes to you. <br />
<br />
More complex social structures bring more from the voice such as, "you gave the bread as you are a hypocrite, self deceiving person, you should not be proud, you should not show off, you should be this you shouldn't be that."<br />
<br />
You are walking on a rope at a height and every moment that voice tilt you to one side and you become constantly stressful lest to fall. As it is quoted that Moses killed the man and said that it was Devil who killed the man. I do not believe that Moses killed anybody as I later explain why. But it is actually the Devil who kills not the man.<br />
<br />
When some people say that a certain person, say a politician or a wealthy man is evil or is Satan or is antichrist is wrong. Vastness of occupation and control of bad holes is manifested by callousness of the en-captured human entity. Depending on to how callous a man to be towards pain of the other humans he is nearer to be Devil. This closes the gap between recognition of altruism against conscience. <br />
<br />
Assume you never follow the voice of your conscience, the what decides that you are a good human?Only altruism decides. It is because religions in general do not recognise the conscience as the source of moral behaviour. <br />
<br />
Conscience is the sitting room of the bad holes, Devil. It does not make morality among humans. It creates stress as you expect from the bad holes. A religious morality means following external examples of moral-practicing entities. <br />
<br />
How it happens? In the same way that you create your language. You listen how adults talk. Then you imitate it. Then you create a sketch of grammar. Then you put that in work and you experience if that has been to the fineness of environment. Then you make that sketch more fine-tuned. <br />
<br />
If you grew in an environment that uses sign language you do not develop talking, but you only will be able to communicate by using sign language. <br />
<br />
You have no external source and examples of talking and from inside there is no helping hand to teach you the correct way of talking.<br />
<br />
They say there is pattern there, an instinct for communication. It is actually 'you' pure and immune to the intervention of bad holes: the perfect human or the Messiah.<br />
<br />
You are Garden of Eden without the 'serpent'.<br />
<br />
Conscience is a recent idea from enlightenment and humanism. It is precursor to accepting Satanism.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />Peter Joneshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03192918305428815983noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25366947.post-10233583601695866672015-05-06T03:35:00.003-07:002016-01-13T02:22:49.161-08:00Put Your Night Dreams All AwayTo further explain, let me put forward few terms in way that I use.<br />
<ul>
<li>Psychology : Whatever any of you understand from this word, whether on consensus or not. It is study of one person regardless of others.</li>
<li>Family : Man plus woman plus zero or more child(ren).</li>
<li>Sociology : Study of aggregate of humans when they are establishing something, a structure, out of more than one family.</li>
<li>Social psychology or psychological sociology: philosophers might emphasise to choose and use one or the other; it is the study of psychology of an entity such that that entity constitutes of more than one person in its sociological background.</li>
<li>There is no such thing as study of one imaginary person grown from his birth, alone and in isolation, in a remote island.</li>
</ul>
This introductory paragraph helps us to recognise different instances of bad holes in their different sizes, and in different settings from very unrecognisable instance to one that I described as the one who is lacking any human host inside its body. We are unmasking bad holes when we encounter pathologies. Pathologies are exaggerated and amplified demonstration of inner and most of the time invisible bad holes that at its final form comes as embodiment of Satan:<br />
<div style="font-style: italic; margin-left: 20px; margin-right: 20px;">
The bad hole that now has got his own body is hungry, and there is no human inside it to satiate [IT].</div>
Whatever man produces as dream-thoughts could be daydreams, i.e., good holes or night dreams, i.e. bad holes. Regression is also of the texture of good holes. I define regression as going back in time in your mind and remembering your experiences of life and in a daydream forgetfulness repairing faults, revenging miseries and in a quantum leap restarting your life from that point in all glory and success that you believe you deserve.<br />
<br />
Hence, when you are sleeping and you see the dreams, know all of them from the bad hole not from you; not anything related to you and not to your existence what so ever. Source of all of them is the bad hole. You find yourself and part of your affairs among random pieces of those dreams but they are actually constituents of the enemy inside visualised in that way, using your vocabulary to communicate with you.<br />
<br />
I already said that psychoanalyst knows the dreams important as keys to your fears and to your fearful experiences and tries to use them in interpreting the root and episodes of your past frightening and fearful events that suffer your soul in an attempt to heal them. This is very rudimentary understanding of bad holes as the complexities of bad holes are already in level of human mind by itself and they act with that complexity so also, especially when it gets so powerful that might appear as a dysfunction or malaise against normal behaviour of average human. <br />
<br />
That entity should be burned completely as we see in the book of <a href="http://www.messiahpsychoanalyst.org/Documents/Moses.html">Moses</a> when he encountered the burning tree and then he came out all white and his staff (his phallus that already had been raped by the antichrist) live and lively again and he in charge of it. That staff anihilated the staff of antichrist which is not the phallus of human but actually the tail of serpent. He kneeled down the power of chicanery of Satan.<br />
<br />
If one needs to interpret anything should interpret his own daydreams and regressions when his soul is in charge and in control.<br />
<br />
Satan I said is the carcass of human filled with the bad hole and empty of any human residual entity. It is interpreted by Messiah as a human filled with the serpent as if the head of serpent coincides with the head of man and its tail coincides with what the phallus of the man should be. <br />
<br />
This is the reason that man circumcise to physically differentiate between phallus and tail of snake. Man also believed that clitoris of woman is the tail of serpent in the sense of this discourse and knew women the source of influence of Satan. This is absolutely wrong and inspired by Satan. Satan only has carcass of human and inside is all bad hole. It has no gender and physically perhaps hermaphrodite. As we see in the book of <a href="http://www.messiahpsychoanalyst.org/Documents/Women.html">Women</a>, man and woman are two complementing pieces that together make one unit of human, each bring a part of human phallus to make a whole phallus.<br />
<br />Peter Joneshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03192918305428815983noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25366947.post-90352388108589453112014-12-17T19:12:00.003-08:002015-02-06T01:50:22.234-08:00Dreams Are not You. Satan walks on earth.As an animal, man in nature, should not go into the deep sleeping phases in the way that civilised man experiences. That contradicts with him being on guard against vulnerabilities that he has in the nature in terms of constant threats and miseries surrounding him. <br />
As brain and body of animals evolved more their nervous system became tasked to more house-keeping and information gathering business and his duties of search and finding food, survival and reproduction became more complicated. That made him exhausted in need of rest. While in rest and fall of any movement, vital forces inside him try to shut the entire system into recuperation phase. His eyes become closed to prevent him continuing gathering information and adding to the load of his exhausted body; other senses and means of external communication follow. Only the most necessary activities and those activities that in course of evolution have become adopted with rest state continue to function. <br />
But this period of relaxation does not and cannot continue. Fear and alertness for survival return the body into the awake state. Eyes fall for seconds, ears for a second, nose for less than a second. Then noises, heat and cold and wind and rain interrupt him; most important is the call of duty. <br />
He needs to be careful of his environment. He is vigilant. He is experiencing fear. He is alone sitting in a corner watching the dance floor. A tiny little bad hole starts to converse with him. Bad hole starts to take a picture of his "mind" to use and to aggrandise and to use later. Bad hole takes random pictures. Your eyelids only fall for couple of seconds and fear opens them. <br />
Bad hole injects a couple of random pictures into your mind; you remember them as <em>your</em> dream. Fear, bad holes and dreams become interwoven together. A new creature similar to mind of man but invisible and without body and adversary to man begins to emerge next to man. It digs to open more room for itself and less room for you. Serpent sneaks into the Garden of Eden.<br />
At any occasion the bad hole takes the opportunity to approach to you and carve out a piece of you. Best time is when you are not fully on guard: just at the moment that your body becomes numb and your eyes fall, capitulated and completely exhausted, and the moment that your body returns to alertness, and you are not sure what information just at that moment is the most important to be fetched from your memory, or needs to be acquired from the environment.<br />
Interval between these two in civilised human has reached to as long as ninety minutes, in most natural and safe situations.<br />
How far how deep the bad hole can penetrate and occupy the man, occupy you?<br />
Similar to other natural phenomena it occurs in a spectrum from very weak to very powerful. In weak occurrences most-of-you is you yourself integrated and under your own control. Bad holes are in check and long way to grow. This is among most of population.<br />
If bad holes grow man starts to fight with them. That can consume part of his energy and functionality. <br />
Cases happen that man is completely goes under the control of bad holes. He exists but cannot overcome the bad hole commands, communication and control. He is overwhelmed by constant intervention of bad holes.<br />
What if nothing remains of man and man completely becomes occupied with the bad hole? Then the bad hole has a body of its own. This is rare in nature. Even a small residue of man inside his body fights back with all his might against full occupation of bad hole. (Remember protons are stable but even among them you might find few that disintegrate to other entities - a very rare occasion.)<br />
However, similar to all phenomena, one might observe in few rare occasions, through the history, such a situation that a man is empty of man and filled only with bad hole.<br />
Bad hole occupies an apparently human entity fully with no human residue in its body. What is this, embodiment of bad hole, then? This THING that I said should be shown like chemical radicals inside brackets as [IT]. This THING that is not he or she or even usual it? What is that THING? <br />
Bad holes suffer their host with fear, shame, dis-functionality, and other malaises. Bad hole, as already I explained, reads the mind of its host and brings a picture of the past bad experience synchronised with the present situation to make that bad experience more persistent. What such embodiment of bad hole might look for? There has remained no host for it to suffer what will be behaviour of such a muonium element?<br />
<br />
Humans have experienced occasional occurrence of such entity. They have called it Satan. An embodiment of human shape that is full of evil; the perfect bad hole. There is no hooves, horn and tail and no fiery eyes and no fork teeth.<br />
<br />
Satan looks for, searches for someone to suffer in place of the host that it lacks. Satan looks to find the <strong><em>Perfect Human</em></strong> among the human aggregate.<br />
<br />
<br />Peter Joneshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03192918305428815983noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25366947.post-65138283001782116242014-11-14T04:39:00.003-08:002016-01-13T02:12:05.508-08:00Can You Invest on Dreams?From ancient times dreams were a source of fascination for human beings; made him believe that beyond this world that everything is solid, harsh, irreversible and hurting there is another world where impossible easily can become possible. One could see he falls from the cliff but he wakes up safe and sound without any bone broken. Hence, there is another world somewhere out there that should be searched for. Only that one needs to find a way. But, wait a minute! Why such a world, the world he sees in dream, is so hash-mash and mishmash, so randomly patched? <br />
<br />
Humans used to believe that dream is a door to beyond open to them. He believed it is his soul, his spirit, some etheric intangible entity, that is not vulnerable to harshness of material world, and in contrast to it, that can be separated from his body and easily can travel into and experience the other worlds and even might be able to carry his body. Who, then, interprets these things, these sceneries that man beholds? <br />
<br />
The key answer and key of messiah psychoanalyst is this : interpreter is <strong><em>the</em></strong> "mind" of human. So there is mind and there is dream : <strong><em>two</em></strong> things. Mind watches the dream or <strong><em>has to</em></strong> watch the dream helplessly. Human can observe that he cannot control flow of dreams and while he is watching the dream - and he believes he is <strong><em>in</em></strong> dream - he has not power to assert himself and is not able to change its course. <br />
<br />
There were reasons that man believed dreams should be part of him. He had day dreams, too. He used to sit on the side of the cliff and to imagine that he could fly over to other side of the gorge. He loved to immerse in the raging waves and could breath and swim and come alive from the other shores. He had a wish that he could beat the ruler down in face of his injustice to become the ruler and to rule with all justice. He could understand that these are all just day-dreams and at the end of the day he has to tolerate all miseries for a piece of rotten bread. Therefore, dreams, when he is sleeping, are part of his wishes similar to his daydreams; he speculated. <br />
<br />
Again the key predicament, I put extend forward, is that he is able to stop the daydream and control it and revise and change it and make himself the winner of wishes in his imagination and even makes it true by personal strife and struggle, all in contrast to what the "night" dream is.<br />
<br />
Man also believed that as having mind and soul is endowed only to humans then only humans, and no animal, can have a dream.<br />
<br />
Interpretation of dreams started to become part of endeavour of humans and in particular part of commitment of medicine men, priests and witches.<br />
<br />
<br />Peter Joneshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03192918305428815983noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25366947.post-35247113817470810012014-03-18T07:06:00.000-07:002014-08-14T15:37:51.215-07:00Can I Invest on Holes?Psychoanalyst, correctly, has based its paradigm on the idea that these capsulated information bits and pieces, called complexes in their jargons, can be deciphered and opened and faced with by deep thinking to remember past memories and dreams. What was found wrong with psychoanalysis that it became deserted? I already discussed it. First, it became the tool of Hollywood and Satanism that is pervading modern societies. Second it was not followed and corrected by generations of people who should be as bright and innovative and original discoverer in the same level as its founder. Third it fell in the hands of pseudo-science and charlatans and started to be used to create generalised babbles to sooth and cheat and gather wealth and power. It created descriptions that almost every person with any personality could accept as his own description (these generalised descriptions are kind of keys that can be abused to open the inner sanctuary of humans for Satan, and has been used so). It helped to excite new frequencies for bad holes. See, you cannot say that internal combustion engines discovered but only few wealthy people could use its benefits and others mostly became hurt by it.<br />
<br />
I talked about bad holes as if I have seen them and have taken their pictures. My propositions seems like what they call nominalism. I create a name and mount attributions on it. Then I believe it exists without being able to prove that the basic entity should exist at the first place. Again I remind you that I got the idea of holes from the semiconductors; holes that I describe as the excitements in lattices of human societies fit comprehensively in those models similar to a pseudo-particle. I also mentioned similar abstractions useful for practical benefits that in theory defy the laws of nature. Such were an ideal band pass filter or a choke in electrical current, passing into superconductivity and other second degree phase transformations in material, existence of liquids that look like solid due to extreme viscosity. You need to assume an axiomatic entity and see if it fits your requirement, inclusively and excluding.<br />
<br />
Again it comes where is Messiah in these arguments. Psychoanalyst, approached brilliantly to connect tumults of human soul with his societal behaviour and his religious, transcendental thoughts, perceptions and interpretations and among those phenomena we find claims of certain humans as being a messenger from a supreme, superior, divine being. However, having an atheist bias, due to the prejudices of the time that inhibited any assertion of such kind of investigations as blatantly dismissed and superstitious, psychoanalyst did not commit itself to further and deeper exploration of such realms.<br />
<br />Peter Joneshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03192918305428815983noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25366947.post-73689648578407917442014-03-17T16:41:00.001-07:002014-08-14T16:08:13.695-07:00Four Characteristics of Bad HolesI try to engage further with psychoanalysis, without using their ideas. It is my own ideas but could coincide with theirs or use their type of discourse.<br />
First characteristic of bad hole is that IT likes to talk with you. Its talk is not friendly. It talks as if it has got its authority from the god, or as if you are its slave or a child under its guardianship. It talks only to blame you as if you have done an unforgiveable sin. Remember, story of Adam and garden. Satan seduced man to something then god forgave man. If the sin was serious god would not forgive him. Seriousness of the sin is the blame that man receives from Satan. You can sort out things with god but you can't with Satan. You are from the material of god but you have not anything with Satan. Satan is like a shadow and you can't fight with a shadow. Bad hole means lack of something. It looks real since you are the real one.<br />
<br />
Second, the bad hole tries to connect to your body and asserts itself. Bad hole has not a body and needs your body to move around and brings the dormant bad holes into the life such that in human society only bad holes move around and human succumbs to their overwhelming dominance and human race becomes annihilated. Later we'll see if the bad holes can get enough soldiers they will annihilate the entire universe. That is a future proposition that we might infer from our arguments. Well, back to dance-floor, you might become ashamed not joining the boogie and that is a somatic condition triggered by the bad hole. When you are bashful, your body is passing a stage synchronising with state of your mind. Your mind is busy analysing the environment and planning strategies to attach to social lattice. It commands secretion of a modest amount of chemical to engage with situation. It is a good potion for the body. You have seen a four-year-old child taken to a friend's house. At the beginning she is silent and "polite" and behaving, sitting in an armchair next to mum. You say that he is bashful. After an hour you have to leave the friend to take the child out before she demolishes your friend's house beyond any economical repair. Therefore, that shyness is part of human nature and fades upon reconnaissance of place . One is not sure if the visiting environment is friendly or hostile. It is not fear (which is a kind of shyness and vice versa). It is not a sin (again shyness). "God put me in this garden. I am not sure if that tree is something edible or poisonous. But, anyway, I am bashful to approach and examine. Let me wait for a while and then taste." And, after a couple of days, god has to take you out before you demolish the garden beyond any repair. At the point that you are bashful to examine, bad hole finds the opportunity to realise itself towards becoming existing. It compresses all the information of that point of the time-space-chemistry-etc. in a code, adds fear to it and save it somewhere for ITS own future reference. How can IT do that job? Where in nature you have seen that a chunk of information can be encapsulated? Yes, remember ants. The ant who returns from its search gets encapsulated information of the address of its colony from the coming ants and gives encapsulated information of address of the food to them: "Where is the queen?" and the other "Where is the food that you have found?" And we said, "Where is the path to brain?" and next door neuron or something asks, "Where is the point of burning?" When the ant gets to home it is yet another ant; he cannot remember where was the food. He only remember the address of colony. When signal of burning gets to brain then it is not burning anymore; it is a pain inside the brain<br />
<br />
Third specification of the bad hole is that it creates dreams. When you are sleeping, you are rejuvenating your body. Your mind allows your body to sort out itself and make up for sufferings you have received during the day. Your mind allows its slave to rest. Primitive man in nature had another way of sleeping. Modern man should wake up and connect with and check the environment every ninety minutes. That is similar to the point that you were bashful. You are excited to face the arena. It is deeper than entering your friend's and chemicals are more readily available for the bad hole to jump. Your mind does not accompany you as coordinated as should be. While you are in preparation, the bad hole makes your cognition full of the scattered points of bashfulness capsules.<br />
<br />
Last characteristic is that the bad hole, upon acquiring certain level of control over you, starts to talk with people. IT completely overpower you in many arenas of activity where IT has got its keys to switch you off.<br />
<br />Peter Joneshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03192918305428815983noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25366947.post-85376039076709754652013-12-07T13:45:00.003-08:002014-03-17T15:29:37.639-07:00Bad Holes are Independent EntitiesYou are eager to know if the bad hole is part of you or independent of you and what is "bad" in it. It is not part of you. "<em>You,"</em> means all things which are in favour of you. Similar to good holes bad holes are out there waiting, non-causal, until they attach to you by a cause. That cause is not related to you. If your dance partner has not received their cards or received it very late it is not your fault. This is the first step that you can take, to get rid of the bad holes. Viruses use the machinery of your cells into their possession and destroy the life or make it miserable. Cancer cells are human flesh but they are not part of the human body and their goal is not improve or sustaining life for the inflicted person. Psychoanalysis did not recognise this and confused them with you. I hope I can progress further, if Messiah stays with us. Bad hole jumps on your nerve like an independent living individual and ruin your night out. Otherwise, you can sit and enjoy many hours there. You need not to be one of the dancing individuals to have a pleasing time. You can sit and drink and watch the dancers. You can listen to different tunes played by the orchestra, enjoy the lighting and decoration of arena. Think about forms, sounds, solve something you had at the back of your mind from work, home, or school. Suddenly a bright idea could come to your head. You could easily feel being inside the social bonding of the dancing group firmly bound into their lattice. You are human with infinite dimensions to play with. But the bad hole knocks you only about the sole activity that you did not commite to: the dance. IT tries to blame you and keep you busy with its blame. You are being knocked. Your being blamed. IT is knocking. IT is blaming. It gives the feeling of humiliation by belittling you. The amount that you surrender to its influence, will be the amount of miserable feeling in you; that is being beaten and stung by an alien invisible enemy within you. You succumb to Satan - your enemy - in its burgeoning form. Psychoanalysis calls this a burgeoning neurosis. You avoid infinite activity of mind and accept surrender to some ignorable retreat. <br />
Bad hole, even in its dwarf stage, like a good hole is a full human with all intelligence of a human. IT does not like to remain dwarf and unnoticed. IT wants to replace you in the society and fill you and move your physical body like a cloak, like a carcass of a zombie around and to show all the arts that it has, to other humans. IT likes to be mobile and flowing in society and activate dormant members of ITs kind inside the others into the rebellion phase. IT moves inside your psyche, inside your mind, your soul, you memory in search of pieces useful for its mission to tighten its grip on you. You have just missed an opportunity, a very unimportant one. Your partner could be with you and by all fairness one of you could be very tired from the daily chores and would prefer to sit and to talk. But the bad hole has no forgiveness for you. Bad hole wants to make a disaster from you are being left alone. Bad hole takes a full picture, a full copy of your psyche at that miserable situation with all shades, colours and details and keep it somewhere usurped in your memory for ITs future referral. It smears your soul with its own footprints and saliva and its insectile fecula.<br />
<br />
Bad holes have four essential characteristics. They are in charge of creating almost all of your dreams. They create undesirable somatic discomfort. They talk to your psyche as if being an authorised in charge and owner of you and lastly they try to shut you down and talk in place of you with people, mostly through the body language and your unwanted lapse of tongue.<br />
<br />
Most human beings experience them as dreams, and that is it. Then they talk about those dreams and sometimes believe them or become frightened and thoughtful of those dreams then the bad hole becomes satisfied. Bad hole tries to materialise itself from that launch pad.<br />
Bad hole partially shuts down you. Peter Joneshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03192918305428815983noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25366947.post-35533021472077553052013-09-23T17:49:00.000-07:002014-08-14T16:27:38.948-07:00Bad Holes and SatanYou have a point of contact. Where is it? You get a signal from this and pass it to that. To appreciate we return to nature and to evolution. When you touch something hot a signal becomes created and each cell from the tip of your fingers to wherever you believe it is being interpreted, mind or brain, asks the next door cell to inform his next door that the first cell is hot and might be damaged and it needs another type of signal to be forwarded to him to be contracted and to avoid burning. They have a system of communication and command. Perhaps physiologists are aware of that mechanism, or if not then in future might learn. What if the cells were not attached together and a small gap existed between them? Could they communicate? They could. We behold it in nature. Ants are not actual individuals. They are units of a single body but they are separated and extended. They do not follow rules of separate living things in search of food and reproduction. People wrongly call them social beings. They are not social. They are not even as social as some mammals such as wolves or dogs who create a small pack. One colony of ants living in an "ants hill" as their living place is called, are one big ANT and can't live with another colony or accommodate the other's individual ants. Here you see how far sex, phallus and essence of psychoanalysis could explain things. Ants are not individuals since they do not reproduce individually. I said RNA divides since it has an existential need to be served. It needs to stay. It is here to stay. He says I should remain. One cell stores fat to survive when there is no food but what happens if it becomes annihilated. He needs to keep one copy of himself somewhere and consequently he fills the entire planet with his copies. In a much more basic than ants those copies know that they belong to the same clan; ants know their own clan. It is not a clan. It is the body; their body. All ants serve one queen for sexual reproduction but they work and communicate though they are not attached as a single organ. In evolution of human mind, human keeps blue prints of communication of separated ants somewhere deep and deep hidden in him. First, there is a queen of ants somewhere in you that controls the reproduction and integration of ants of your body in their specialised duties, some for communication, some for movements and so on. Second, you have kept an evolution blue print to summon and integrate individuals of the society which constitute the aggregate of humans. It is a natural phenomenon that human has created large clans with individuals at their specialised duties. You tend to accommodate and incorporate new individuals who emerge as alien into your society, by birth or by moving to your vicinity. This is the reason that when music becomes more exciting, you make a distance from your couple. You allow the network becomes loose but you remain bounded together and even can accommodate singled out individual. You create bubbles, holes with all specification of humans to compensate for the absent partners. Music does not create excitement. You create excitement; exciting music is your creation. Salmons who swim up streams and jump on the top of cliffs for reaching to their mating spring, hear that melody, that exciting music that reminds them that they are one and the same individual, but has been left as many copies to fill the earth and to know that they are here to stay.<br />
<br />
Why do you become engaged in a fighting? Because you are in a cheek to cheek bound. If the music becomes more excited, the melody of the origin, you become more and more integrating until you become unified and one in an amorphous and asexual fluid. Then you attack your neighbouring clan in a unified self. But at the same time they also were engaged in their dance of unification. You communicated with them and they became alarmed and they could not recognise the essence of the signal they were receiving. It was the melody of the origin but not tuned harmoniously on the second clan frequencies. You beat each other. Those who remain from the both sides, winner or loser become one newly integrated clan. So not only you communicate in near field of dancing floor but in far fields when you were scattered clans in primitive nature. As has been studied by anthropologists and psychoanalysis at the beginning of the last century, these wars were considered by primitive men as a game rather than deep hostility that now we witness in wars. Far field and remote communication have been verbalised in forms of war propaganda in our modern world that humans cannot integrate them in unification. In essence, it is invitation messages to integrate all clans; they are from your cousins. Why do they conclude to hostility? Because the tuning melodies differ in pitch and tone and frequency of resonance and receive distorted. There are hostile terrains on paths of signals; annihilating elements. Fears that accompany man from the beginning origin of the life. Each clan encrypts its own communication signals to keep it secret from the real natural enemies, but that makes them undecipherable for other human clans as well, in the same way that each human clan has created his own verbal language and by moving around each language immediately finds its way into changing into a new language undecipherable by other alien clans. Language comes deep from the essence of human nature from his mind from a deeply buried and conserved reservoir of blue prints that man carry from the origin of creation to today. That reservoir is not in you or in me. It is somewhere, far and well kept. Study of languages is far more surprising than study of a cell or even the human brain.<br />
<br />
In the dance floor you are separated but communicative from a distance. You talk with each other without using speech. You are talking with body language. You are using good holes to take the message. You were innocent and pure in your ancient rituals of dance to the drums and strings and pipes. Satan entered in paradise of your innocence. Made you ashamed. Suddenly you felt that you are naked. Your excitement turned into the shame. You left the dance floor and went to sit to talk in a corner with the bad holes. Satan turned your unified being into antagonist individuals. Satan took your peace and spread the seeds of hostility among men. Satan asked you to sacrifice a man for its own purported excitement. You did that and you tasted pain of regret and shame. Then Satan came and found the point of your connection and filled it with its voice of blame. So instead of connection to each other you became busy of being engaged with Satan. You were wandering to connect to each other to return to the spring that once you had descended from it into the ocean but you were forced to feed Satan and entertain its desires.<br />
<br />
That reservoir is not in you or in me. It is somewhere, far and well kept. It is in a virtual space that has been created by a first desire: "You stay there and replace me as a copy of me, in case that I do not be here." Virtual space that exists in excited dance floor in amorphous integration of all. That reservoir is Messiah.Peter Joneshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03192918305428815983noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25366947.post-65196622826287106932013-09-22T13:32:00.000-07:002013-09-23T16:51:32.840-07:00Good Holes, Bad HolesA friend asked for further clarification of the dance floor. He wrongly understood that it is you that move to other side and there is no hole. I clear once more. <br />
Assume a female enters without a partner into the hall from the left door and finds all people are coupled in cheek-to-cheek. She is standing at the edge of dancing folks. Now music becomes more excited. The network of people becomes loose. She starts to move her body, though without a partner, to adjust her level of excitement to the background music. She is dancing with a 'nobody,' with a hole, with a male hole. When excitement reaches a certain level, and the people are not solidly attached together, she finds a moment that she grabs and becomes coupled with a real male at the leftmost edge. The male hole already dancing with her moves one place towards the female that now has been left alone. This girl in her turn grabs the boy next to her and leaves, pushes the hole to the right, lets the hole to dance with the boy's partner. Hole moves one more space towards the right edge. So the single girl is still at the left edge, coupled with a real male, only the hole moves one by one to the centre and then terminates at the far right, leaves a girl at the right edge alone.<br />
<br />
You can conceive a situation in which at the time that the singleton girl enters from the left door, by some chance a male enters from the right whose partner has not accompanied him. This boy upon excitement of arena start to move his body at the edge with a female hole and with more excitement he grabs a girl at the edge and pushes the hole to the left. Partner of that girl, not being a fun ruining guy, starts to dance for a short transient time with the hole until he faces with the next girl at his left and grabs her and pushes the hole further to the left. What happens then? Female hole coming from the right to the left and male hole coming from the left to the right meet each other and they disappear; nobody needs them anymore. Ripple dies upon their demobilisation. <br />
<br />
The situation in this thought experiment is arbitrarily idealised. In reality the hole moving randomly around the arena; not necessarily in a straight line to the left. The same fact is true about a piece of semiconductor.<br />
<br />
As you do not know that a potential partner has arrived from the other end, that lack of knowledge reflects in the form of a non-causal (i.e., it is there before you) ghost partner, a hole, that follows you. It is non-causal as the dancing arena does not know that you are not accompanied by your partner. It is part of the excitement of the arena. Also, it is attached to your excitement. You paint it and you make it real. Speed of its attachment is immediate.<br />
<br />
These holes are good and helpful and keep your bounds to other humans. When your bound established they disappear. In the previous post I was talking about the bad holes. You have a point of contact with other individuals, the bad hole comes and cover it. It asks you to sit and if you do not obey, it stresses you. It does not go away. It comes closer and create a barrier between you and others. These bad holes have certain properties. It can read your mind. But those properties gradually will be revealed for you.<br />
At this point I have another caveat added for clarification my goal to invite your attention. There are cults or gurus or preachers or religions whatever you might call them, especially in this era of fast and pervasive dissemination or selling of ideas that talk about holes in their own contextual meaning that I am not familiar with. They say everything is hole and god or Satan or what ever is hole and galaxies are holes. And as I am not familiar with those ideas, I cannot judge them in any way and I just have heard that such thing as "hole" is in their discourse. I borrowed this word from modern electronics just to enlighten my argument. I will pass over it similar to discussion that I had about muonium; nothing more. There is nothing "holy" about "holes" in these notes.<br />
<br />Peter Joneshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03192918305428815983noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25366947.post-46126718210223348562013-07-31T06:51:00.003-07:002013-09-14T04:28:10.455-07:00On Holes and PsychoanalystI assigned for me the task of bridging holes, mind reader and psychoanalyst together. I said that any phenomena in nature is seen in a continuum; in a spectrum of very weakly or rarely observable to stronger more accentuated and more observable. <br />
<br />
I mentioned periodic table as one of the strongest evidences of such assertion. Moving from left of the table to the right we go from the strong chemistry of metallic forms to non-metals and at last to the so called inert elements. Inert elements are there to prove that, in the spectrum, somewhere you can not have any chemistry of bonding. Even the last assertion appears in a continuum. At the top of the inert elements you find neuteronium; it is one isolated neutron. It is radioactive and unstable and after a while it decays to a hydrogen atom. As it should, it has zero electron as it has no proton; hence, no chemical affinity. Its state is not gaseous, liquid or solid. Next, towards bottom, there is helium which is completely inert and only can be solidified in extreme low temperatures. It is almost an ideal gas. As you go to the bottom of inert elements, towards the heavier ones, solidification becomes more possible and they become farther from being an ideal gas. It is conceived that beyond the last natural inert element, radon, the inert elements if ever could be realised in observable amounts will be in solid form and even metallic with easily possible chemical bonding. On the other side we have alkaline metals. As you go down, the melting point of alkaline elements decreases and any conceivable element beyond francium might appear as gaseous. Inside the table you find any incipience of all the phenomena. For example, suddenly nature stops to create an element in certain points, such as technetium, which by all expectation should occur naturally similar to other elements. Nature, has got another secret to be observed for that incipience. <br />
<br />
Psychoanalyst in its advertisement didn't consider this principle of spectrum, while at around the same time, theory of evolution with such principle was in full swing. When you observe behaviour of humans they swing in an n-dimensional (arguably in an infinite dimensional) state space; in each dimension we can observe a continuous spectrum. Such cluster of dimensions makes it beyond simplicity of those simple observations that one beholds inside the periodic table. For human, you need to sum up whatever you see in the realm of living things on our planet. Whatever any plant or animal has intrinsically had, from the dawn of creation of life on earth, might be hidden in a corner of our behaviour. We are in a consensus that human is at the top of evolution. What is the gauge for this assertion. It is just an axiom we accept. Simply, birds might believe that they are at the top of evolution as they can navigate distances as far as the distance between two continents above and over any terrain, or salmons who return to their birth place swimming up stream, up the cliffs with no fear of annihilation, with no map and no compass. There are other magnificent examples, too. Therefore, this is just an axiom, as we observe ourselves. Based on this axiom we should have hidden every capacity that can be seen around the living nature. Remember again, this blog is not about proving Almighty by science or psychology or such ideas. It is not to prove anything. I try only to make an abstraction. That starts with axioms and tries to infer some propositions. <br />
<br />
You respond that human has the largest brain as the sign of being the highest evolved animal. Golden Eagle believes the widest span of the wings is the sign of being at the top of evolution. Bring the question among the humans. Which one is more evolved: a martial artist, an orator, a millionaire or a mathematician. The last one in the real life becomes easily overpowered by the other three. All of them have the same brain and if you believe to something extra as the mind, all of them, even the martial artist actually, use their minds to perform their skills.<br />
<br />
Now let me go back to the dance floor. I said that if you do not be accompanied by your partner and you do not be groovy enough, then under any exciting conditions, you do not join the boogie and you are going to sit in a corner. At this point you feel another invisible partner, similar to the imaginary invisible groovy holes already I described, and friendly with you, comes and attaches to you. Yes, it is attaching rather than keeping the distance and sitting respectfully. This new type of hole, being slimy, viscose and attaching is the first point of bridging into the world of psychoanalysis. Is that you or part of you or half of you? Is it the "other-half" as they say? No, you can recognise yourself. How do you recognise? From the suffering that you feel in your soul. (I use the word, soul, in its linguistic use not as a philosophical term.) You want to repel it and be left alone and enjoy watching dance floor and go back to your friends. You are suffering. That suffering is the beginning of understanding the pain of Messiah. It is the bridge from psychoanalyst to Messiah.Peter Joneshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03192918305428815983noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25366947.post-17459478324750365632013-04-18T05:49:00.000-07:002013-07-10T05:56:24.282-07:00On Suffering of Jesus Christ and FloodPeople say that Romans nailed the wrists of Jesus Christ to the cross and this was the suffering of the 'Son of the God'; he even did not die. He survived the cross! People also attribute to Jesus a lot of useless knowledge of every preacher that one should be kind with his neighbours and give a coin to beggars and so on. Accordingly, this is all that Jesus suffered for the stupid sin of someone (Adam) who lost easy life of paradise to hunger and death on the earth. And he did that for a humble apple, and it was because his wife intrigued him. What was the tool of the wife for intriguing? Before eating the apple they were not aware of the sexual organ of each other; peacefully were next to each other naked without noticing that they were naked. They even were not aware that they had that organ, let alone use it for intriguing or become intrigued. When there is no other man or woman around and no sexual life then what is the meaning of intriguing? Why human being needs such a nonsense story for generations and so vehemently embrace such a myth? You might say that it is symbolic. Then go and ask Pop or archbishops, or ayatollahs or rabies or Dalai Lama what is the meaning of the symbol. Do they know? No, only Jesus knows. In Roman Empire even a wealthy person could crucify his chef if the chef could not provide prestigiously for his special banquets, without any court or answering anybody. Every week Roman authorities crucified scores of people mostly innocent who had little children and were thirsty and had half grey beards and looked very humble in talking and demeanour. <br />
In the stories we read that Noah had eight hundred years time to convince people that a flood would come and take them with, and Noah would be safe and had the know-how to tell them how they could survive safely by joining to him. He received harassment and mockery and almost nobody joined to him and a lot of other unbelievable things such as flooding the earth to the top of highest mountains and taking all the animals to a humble one-man-made do-it-yourself ship. You say it is a nonsense fable, or it is a symbolic story about fights of human being against the nature. Your reasons are feasibility and possibility and so on. Why for many thousands years people have accepted this story? You say that they are fanatics. Well, why do they depict people of Noah's time so intellectual and objective? Why not those people were fanatics? Why they were not simpletons and scary and start to pray and beg Noah to do something for them to save them? They were intellectuals and asked Noah for hard evidence such as some satellite pictures and data and atmospheric models, but after them people lost their wisdom and started to believe in retrospect that such things had actually happened and they did not enquire for any evidence. Moreover, situation became reversed and non-believers became object of harassment and mockery.<br />
<br />
My story is like that. No one will believe it as much as I try to write it down and expand it even in eight hundred years.Peter Joneshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03192918305428815983noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25366947.post-2640713392544339452012-12-29T03:06:00.000-08:002013-04-06T05:41:53.172-07:00Stories of Messengers Become More RealisticWe concluded that as we were moving towards more recent events of history and human became more rigorous in writing and recording of events, messengers of the God also became less supernatural in behaviour and their lives became recorded as the life of ordinary people. The last one established himself among the people and part of his mission covered ordinary administration of a society.<br />
<br />
If you read history, the life of Muhammad very carefully has been recorded. What he has left behind has been divided in two parts: one part, based on his own instruction is from God and is collected as a holy book sent from the God, and all of his followers have consensus on every detail of that. Another part of his legacy his followers quote from him as an ordinary person talking from his own intelligence and in many occasions his followers have controversy about. <br />
<br />
Read stories of ordinary people who were not prophet and are known as saints and similar entities, living after Muhammad until very recent eras. Still, there are fables attributing strange things to them not attributed to Muhammad. In the Muhammad's holy book, except for his journey to Jerusalem over one night, there is nothing to be interpreted as Muhammad being supernatural being or has done as a supernatural feat; in contrast in any occasion it is emphasized that he was an ordinary human but with a mission. That assertion does not end to Muhammad alone. His book also extends that to other messengers who came before him.<br />
<br />
What is the rational inference of this chronology. It is that the positivist philosophy seems to come around. When humans become more scientific they become less superstitious, less believing in supernatural phenomena. It shows that we can reach to the conclusion that prophets before Muhammad also were similar. It is not possible that Moses becomes endowed with such a convincing power and can sink an army chasing him into the sea, but God deprived his son of being able to overpower three soldiers who came and arrested him. As details about Muhammad have been written clearly he completely followed rules of ordinary conflicts and tactics in his campaigns. Sometimes defeated, sometimes won.<br />
<br />
What I want to say is that if we say the messengers were supernatural beings it is similar to saying pyramids were built by jennies and ghouls and aliens from other planets not by project managers and geometricians and calculating people. It is similar to saying that man has not capacity to build such a colossal monuments and man has not the capacity to receive the message of god.<br />
<br />
Now read history of Muhammad; parts which are not written as the holy book. We read that he talked with people. He invited people for dinner and he invited people to believe. He went to different places and asked them to believe. People stoned him and insulted him without he being able to convince them or stop them. He led some wars and instructed his army to such and such. Everything was absolutely earthly.<br />
<br />
Let's go back a few century and go to the time of Jesus Christ. There are similar stories about him. He travelled from this place to other place and talked and invited people and it is said that he faced a court, a trial. Story of that court has been told millions of time during the centuries. It shows defence of an earthly skilled lawyer who foil an unjust prosecutor. The Roman, as it is said, washed his hand. That was correct and meant that in his soul he could not reach to a legal verdict against Christ. Consider that Romans had a sophisticated administration and lawyers were part of their cultivation; for instance Cicero was a famous lawyer. Romans were familiar with defendants who could thwart government prosecutors by pointing out the right precedence and written laws.<br />
<br />
That will eliminate the need to add thunder bolts and lightning to the story.Peter Joneshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03192918305428815983noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25366947.post-71626249906081823372012-04-25T03:46:00.000-07:002012-05-26T11:50:32.302-07:00Religion Is AbstractionI frequently reiterate that I am not one who wants to preach any of the existing religions. I am not one who wants to prove that any of the existing religions is actually consistent with the modern science or modern psychology, or modern politics and is good for the well being and moral behaviour though they look superstitious and old fashioned. I do not want to prove that modern life is analytic and people should have a synthetic soul and should escape from the maddening tumult and lust of their environment in cities to comfort and peace of religions in the convents and monasteries and meditate.<br />
No, I want to say that religion is not religion. Pyramids supposedly were built as being very big tombstones for a wealthy and powerful person as the symbol of his religion. And archaeologists go there and clean bones with a fine brush and sit there for years to find a piece of charcoal. For me it shows practical people sitting together, calculating, knowing materials, managing workforce, and defending projects to sponge more money from the king for their wild imaginations. It means they knew formulas of trigonometry. They were true when they told the king that with such a project he would be resurrected. They were true when they said that the king needed all those paraphernalia when he would resurrect. He needs the golden mask to be recognised as with his real face as a king. They were true that he needed those paintings and writings on the walls with servants and ministers and story of his daily life when he should be resurrected. They were not fools to put stones on top of the stones because of their wrong stupid idea of resurrection of their king.
<br />
Now listen to people who were descendants of builders of those pyramids and were living millenniums after those builders. They had all kinds of stories about those pyramids such as being built by monsters and jennies and such; couldn't believe their great great grandfathers were in that capacity they attribute to monsters. Even in modern times some people said that man could not build such colossal buildings. They say that those were built by aliens from other worlds. They say that those were built by whipping slaves. You can gather not slaves, but a million of paid workers and start to shout at them to build a mound of dirt and then go and come back after a year and see if anything has been done. But, we have Euclid who could make an elegant abstraction out of those builders' rough ideas; abstractions that did not include monsters and aliens and slaves. <br />
In the similar way we have other types of stories such as a garden and a married couple and a mesmerising snake who could defy the sanctuary of god and could tempt the woman to eat from a forbidden tree. What is its abstraction? Here, a most dreadful animal for human becomes tempting. Why <em>that thing</em> should not come in a more presentable form? <br />
Then we get to the story of a flood that covers all the earth since in a village a group of people were making fun of a crazy person who was building a ship far from any water in the middle of the desert. This is more acceptable story than the tempting snake.<br />
Then Abraham's and after him Moses' gradually become more acceptable: There is no tempting snake and Sweden will not become flooded for the sin of a village in the Middle East.<br />
Until we get to story of Jesus Christ which includes even less supernatural events. Still, he has some strange arts such as converting water to expensive wines but people kill him instead of making a profitable business out of him. When it gets to Muhammad it becomes so realistic that "Muhammad goes to mountain if mountain does not come to him." Then people know very detailed account of his time and day to day life of him.<br />
What is the abstraction of these. You might say that it is enough since you can guess that I am going to paraphrase them as symbols of something earthly. No, remember, Euclidean geometry is abstraction of the facts and by itself it is divine. It is not earthlyPeter Joneshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03192918305428815983noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25366947.post-27318564319333032552012-04-24T07:30:00.000-07:002013-07-24T10:08:37.024-07:00Mind Reader, Holes, and PsychoanalystWe were talking about the holes in the semiconductors, then we promised to connect it to psychoanalysis. Then we jumped on the dance floor until we got to the shy person who was not groovy and we said that we relate it to psychoanalysis. Another leap took us to the mind reader in the ancient societies. What is the synthesis of <em>camel</em>, <em>cow</em>, and <em>leopard</em>; a giraffe? We have seen holes in the semiconductors actually exist; they are not a convenience. A hole is an extra positive charge, but if you examine a piece of semiconductor its total charge is zero; it is neutral. Dance floor analogy is also quite convincing.<br />
<br />
But the mind-reader has not any precedence in our knowledge, or in preachers language and teaching of religions. You might say, "Enough; existence of such a thing as a mind-reader seems pure delusion!"<br />
<br />
We said that when we look at natural phenomena we should look at a spectrum of each phenomenon. We should look at the continuity of that in evolution. We should see what has changed a fish to a crocodile. What has changed a fish to a dove. What has changed a crocodile plus dove to a horse and what has changed a horse to an ape and ape to human and what will be the next stage. The next stage should be searched inside the human evolution. Human is the tip of the arrow. That does not mean that evolution of fish has been stopped. Human evolution is vertically upward, but laterally we can see very shocking events. There is a type of fish living in pitch dark caves, where even a gleam of light cannot be seen for thousand and thousands of years. They look like a trout. They are actually trouts, but that they have not eyes. They have eyes in the same place that a trout has, but as if they have eyelids and they have closed their eyelids. They do not need seeing, hence they have lost their eyes as being a redundant item. They eat and reproduce and play and jump up and down and find their ways around and defend themselves without being able to see. Trees are green and human's eye is most sensitive to green light and bulk of the energy of the Sun radiates in green.<br />
<br />
What is the state of hydrogen in the centre of the sun where temperature is hundred million degrees and pressure is so immense. Is it a metallic hydrogen and it creates energy in cold fusion actually? If one can push hydrogen atoms , that is protons, under immense pressure next to each other protons might fuse together only due to population not due to temperature and a cold fusion could happen. Neutron stars are so dense that electrons have been fused into the protons and made a whole neutron object. But surprisingly they have a magnetic poles like earth and more surprisingly some have been observed with four magnetic poles. Magnetic poles of earth are due to its iron core. Where the neutron star magnetic poles come from as there is no element inside them but pure neutron? How two magnets remain in some type of stability next to each other?<br />
<br />
All these surprises are based on some evidence. How the postulate of a mind reader is supported by any evidence. They even do not exist in our religious teaching. I asserted that Antichrist is a mind reader. Antichrist has been mentioned as the enemy of Jesus Christ as the Satan embodied in form of human. But there is no mention of such a capacity about Antichrist as being a mind reader. <br />
<br />
You should note that some ideas have been the consequence of a brave postulate inferred from previous observations not inferred from existing evidences. <br />
<br />
You should note that great pyramids were not built by knowing Euclidean geometry; centuries before Euclid. In their buildings their designers used all the Euclidean geometry but they had not a clue of such a beautiful abstraction as the Euclidean geometry. <br />
<br />
You should note that Babylonians and many other nations all around the earth could predict lunar and solar eclipse, length of the year, time of equinox and solstice without knowing the theory of Ptolemy; centuries before Ptolemy.<br />
<br />
But the other way is correct. Euclid and Ptolemy abstracted and inferred what they had seen from Egyptian buildings and Babylonians astronomy among other things.<br />
<br />
We hope we can infer such a creature from the stories that have passed to us, from observation of primitive religions such as druids, and shamans and from more familiar teachings of modern (I mean Judaism, Christianity, and Islam) religions, and besides, from the psychoanalyst theories.Peter Joneshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03192918305428815983noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25366947.post-75964627917216031352012-04-15T05:51:00.005-07:002013-07-24T14:11:49.324-07:00Antichrist is the mind reader: Part one<dl><dd class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0.5cm; margin-left: 0cm;">See, mind-reader comes in a society and tells them that he has a certain unbelievable art. People can behold that he has not hooves, or horns, or fiery eyes or claws or fangs. He looks completely like any of them. They ask what is his art. He says that he can read mind of an individual who is living among them. After now I call that individual the targeted victim or just the victim. </dd><dd class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0.5cm; margin-left: 0cm;">At first they believe he is a magician or something and wants to hustle them. Perhaps he wants to become rich. Perhaps he wants to become their king or chieftain. Perhaps he wants beautiful women. Perhaps he wants to live in ease and luxury in their king's palace or in the great temple. Perhaps he wants fame, respect, and honour in the society. No; surprisingly, he does not want any of those. He only wants to use this art for a great goal that is also of demand of their society in exchange of nothing. Not for nothing but for a charitable goal to help the society and that individual. The targeted society does not believe. </dd><dd class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0.5cm; margin-left: 0cm;">They ask him what is his unbelievable art. He says that he knows everything about that individual. He knows every detail of his childhood. He knows his friends. He even knows what he is eating or drinking right now. Whom he loves. Whom he hates. Even what he sees in his dream and what the victim can remember from his past dreams. He says that he can induce dreams into the mind of the targeted victim. People do not believe such a story. Many of them are magicians and know all these tricks but it does not look like any of their arts. They assume perhaps the victim is a confederate of the mind-reader. But no one, near to the victim or far from him have ever seen the victim with this mind-reader. Perhaps the mind reader wants boot-licking the victim. There has been no friendship no kinship or congruity between these two. But the victim, himself is a humble person of no special recognition in the society. Those who know the victim recognise that every detail that the mind-reader claims about the victim is correct. </dd><dd class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0.5cm; margin-left: 0cm;">Perhaps, he has watched the life of the victim for a long time. But they ask themselves that one usually do these things for some material gain, for fame, for honour. Why should the mind-reader watch the victim, an ordinary person, for a long time and then who has provided for sustaining of such a watch for the mind-reader? First the mind-reader should convince a benefactor for his art then commit himself for watching or investigating somebody else's life. They arrange tests to examine the truth of his claims. They send people impromptu to the victim and talk with him. </dd><dd class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0.5cm; margin-left: 0cm;">On the other side, far from them, the mind-reader tells every detail of the conversation; every move of the conversant. They ask the victim what he has dreamt last night. He remembers them lucidly as exactly as it is planned by the mind-reader. People become mesmerised by such an art. They ask him what he wants. They take him to their ruler, to their highest priests. At first these people also cannot believe until they become convinced and mesmerised. They become convinced that the mind-reader does not want anything they grudge for other people such as wealth, power and such. </dd><dd class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0.5cm; margin-left: 0cm;">The mind-reader does not ask any inconvenience from them. What if the victim rebels and attack their churches and palaces. The mind-reader convince them that such things need planning. When the victim plans for them, he becomes aware and immediately people overpower him. If the victim decides to approach certain people and become confederate with them, beforehand they inform the potential confederates. Mind-reader's only request is the total access to the victim. </dd><dd class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0.5cm; margin-left: 0cm;">Why? What is the benefit of such an absurd total access for the ruler, priests and people. </dd><dd class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0.5cm; margin-left: 0cm;">Now, mind-reader looks to the society texture. If they believe in devil ghosts, he says that the victim is occupied by those ghosts and the victim might help the ghosts to overcome their society. If the society believes that they like to hear the voice of their ancestors to help them into the heavens, then the mind-reader says that he can adjust the victim as a medium to hear those voices and when the victim hears those voices the mind-reader also can hear and will tell them. If the society believes there is a way to live an eternal life, the mind-reader says that by watching gradual death of the victim they can discover the secret of eternal life. If the victim is an illegitimate child, say, like Jesus Christ according to his enemies, the mind-reader claims that he helps the society to clean that foul. </dd><dd class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0.5cm; margin-left: 0cm;">But, wait a minute. If the mind-reader can so perfectly knows about the victim, perhaps king or one of his entourage also can learn this art and read the mind of neighbour kings and conquer all the world, but on the condition that they also do not become aware of existence of such art. Great priest has his own dreams. He knows that he has no real power in connection with god or gods or evils and his rituals are void, fake plays to cheat people and for satisfaction of his greed and lust. If he only partially can learn this art and keep it in his secret rings and descendants, then he can cheat thousands and thousands instead of the small population of his fanatics. </dd><dd class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0.5cm; margin-left: 0cm;"><strong><em>Is not the mind of human the ultimate fruit of the entire nature from big-bang and black holes and galaxies and quarks and planets; all worked, until their product can think?</em></strong> </dd><dd class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0.5cm; margin-left: 0cm;">What should that society do in return for such a charity that makes the mind-reader happy as he asks nothing that they have. The mind-reader tells them if he asked one of them inflict a pain to the victim they should obey. But, if the victim dies or be killed the art of the mind-reader remains unfinished and inconsequential. King should give time to the mind-reader to make the king able to harness and use that art for his own goals. Priest should have enough time to learn that art. </dd><dd class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0.5cm; margin-left: 0cm;">No; no killing or fatal injury is intended - mind reader assures them. They should use <b>words</b> to inflict pain on the victim. They should keep the victim harassed, isolated, sanctioned, hopeless, in twilight of death and life, confined as if buried alive, suspended as if on the cross, always looking to see the light at the end of the tunnel but desperate of such glimmer, living but dying, dying but living, deprived of any kindness, deprived of love, affection and sympathy, deprived of validity, deprived of conversation, earning bread, reproducing. </dd><dd class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0.5cm; margin-left: 0cm;">There is only one small obstacle on the way. That is, the victim does not agree with this scheme. He does not want to be sacrificed on the altar of mind-reader. He wants to go around and talk with people and socialise with them. He wants to live his own life; not the life destined for him by the mind-reader. He might protest. He might attack to the maddening annoying crowd. He might punch people to death out of spontaneity and the ruler cannot ignore the blood-shed and relatives of the dead might betray the whole plot. </dd><dd class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0.5cm; margin-left: 0cm;">The first thing that the mind-reader does ask to be done is to intimidate the victim by accusing the victim as being a rebel under persecution of the ruler, under the threat of being executed by the ruler for his crimes against the state. </dd><dd class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0.5cm; margin-left: 0cm;">The origin of ruling a society is the erection of phallus of the ruler. That has sublimated generations after generation in the mind of human as fear from the ruler, from the king, from disobedience to “law,” fear of regicide. It has been sublimated into offering yourself and succumb into a compromising position for the (sexual) gratification and fulfilment of the ruler and his demands. In this way the mind reader locks the manhood of the victim into his own possession. </dd><dd class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0.5cm; margin-left: 0cm;">This is the first element of Satanic ritual of sacrificing man. </dd><dd class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0.5cm; margin-left: 0cm;">The victim knows that human society is not the colony of ants and bees. Not all men are created to think and obey unison in consensus even on the smallest unimportant matters. Inside a house a wife with his husband quarrel for the colour of curtain. How is it possible that a wide society all agree on his suffering even if the most sacred and important matters be at stake.</dd></dl>
Peter Joneshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03192918305428815983noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25366947.post-65925782482566985782012-02-26T01:12:00.007-08:002012-02-28T01:17:43.882-08:00Holes Are Real!If you are too shy they are like real partners; they are groovy and they do not like to mix with shy people. Another hole comes to you ask you to sit in a corner and talk together. You talk with something that does not exist out there. Or, rather, something that does not exist out there talks with you. It is your choice you can go and dance with them or sit and converse. Well, there are plenty of holes around to mix with. Remember that holes are as real as you. I did not mean allegory or symbolism. They need two factors to be realised. First a single individual and then an excited environment. You can arrange the ballroom with uniformed people and similar caps such that pictures taken from the ceiling do not reveal their sex and their individual features. From the left door enters a single; immediately from the right door enters a hole. You can take picture that he or she snatches the first partner at the side and left alone partner of the snatched dancer takes his next door dancer until at the other end, at the left door, a singled out partner becomes kicked out of the salon by the bouncer. When you enter as a single in the dancing room you already bring some discomfort with you as an excitement into the room, but this is not enough. Further excitement will come with the music. I had to add this small post to emphasise that the holes are real and as physically observable as humans in such an arrangement. They are actually invisible humans, perhaps a little heavier, if all the individuals in the room have equal shape and weight in a thought experiment.Peter Joneshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03192918305428815983noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25366947.post-41796258719881441962012-02-20T09:29:00.001-08:002013-07-26T05:52:59.137-07:00Causality and the Holes?<div class="western">
I said that the holes on the dance floor break causality of events. It means that before stimulation comes response is there (do not confuse it with the response in <em>anticipation</em> of stimuli, which is actually causal). This might make you surprised since you know causality the most sacred knowledge of human. Even if you say there are experiments that break causality you implicitly have acknowledged causality. Those experiments are cause of the knowledge you get from the experiment. But wait a minute. We know that a low-pass filter, say in your radio, an ideal low pass filter breaks the causality. To have an ideal low pass filter your system should be turned on from infinite time ago; should be turned on before you switch it on. Hence, it is not realisable. You cannot build an ideal low pass filter and even if you build the best digital radio, there always will be some noise mingled with the desired signal that you like to listen to, because the filters are not ideal at all. You can make a good filter but not an ideal one. We have a saying that "he is so groovy that dances before the music plays." Holes are that groovy. They are dancing before the guest enters the dancing room. They are there grooving and when the individual with no partner enters they attach to him. They wait until the environment becomes excited. They attach to you with the speed of infinity. This is their second breach of nature's law. It is believed that nothing can move faster than light. Well, some say that when you think about a galaxy one million light years away your thought flies with speeds much faster than the light. It is an allegory. You have that information in your mind and you retrieve it very fast; perhaps with the speed of light, and we do not know more than that. But the hole gets information of your presence and that you are a left-alone immediately; with speed of infinity. You cannot decide if the hole is already in the salon or it joined to you in the parking or if it was with you before any time from infinite time ago. Holes become your dancing partner if the environment becomes exited not when it is gelid. If you are too shy they are like real partners they do not come to you. Another hole comes to you ask you to sit in a corner and talking together. This bridges the holes to the psychoanalysis that I have selected as the name of this site. </div>
Peter Joneshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03192918305428815983noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25366947.post-86479039128100701192012-01-22T05:26:00.001-08:002012-03-12T05:12:20.038-07:00More on Holes and on Dance FloorYou know the room is full of holes waiting to grab an unpaired individual, when excited. I said that already: One individual enters the party without his couple accompanying him. He has left alone. All couples are dancing. He is watching. Until the music becomes more exciting and more groovy, then couples "coupling" becomes loose and also the lone boy becomes excited towards rugged edge of the dancing people and grabs the next girl at the edge nearest to him. The girl's partner grabs one from the inner crowd and so on. We said, assume at the same time a lone girl enters from the diagonally opposite door and starts the same process. We said each one has got an opposite sex hole with them. Therefore we have two holes in the room: one girl and one boy. We said we can actually arrange experiments to take picture from them. We said they are not as groovy as others but a bit sluggish. And there will be a point in the middle that they reach together. Now all people are paired. What happens to our hole couples? They go and sit on chairs at a corner waiting if new singled out individual arrives. They have not names. They are not invited. They do not know how to dance. They do not have any acquaintances in the crowd. They do not have a body of flesh materialised. They are just nobody. They just wait for a lonely individual and an excited dance floor to start to groove. How many of them exists? There is no difference. Holes do not exist at all. You can say, many pairs, or just one or just none, until the floor becomes degenerated: If you invite fifty couple and forty of them come singled then with no genre of musics you are able to excite the dance floor.Peter Joneshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03192918305428815983noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25366947.post-81090408868513331082011-08-07T10:47:00.000-07:002011-10-02T11:55:21.766-07:00Man in PanopticonI have written frequently that my aim is not to <em>prove</em> the god and religion by using science. Modern science and the idea of god and religion as we know them are contradictory. I said that I do not mean that the idea of god is good for the psychological benefits of human and giving him comfort and insight for his daily behaviour or inspire and frighten him towards a better moral behaviour. Everything that you claim is so vast and vaguely understood by man that excludes me to commit. Each claim goes into the realm of dedicated scholarships of individuals and groups of people. Why should god sends his son or a messenger who has a very partial knowledge of human affairs let alone to help them to eternal salvage. Messiah only brings some news and some people could only believe him and mostly people could not believe except by conversion, by a sudden transformation of soul. I have shown the contradictory nature of these two discourse: science and religion. Hence, what is all that about the excitons and psychoanalysis? I want to show that there are things that are conceivable. I want to show that the idea of god and Satan is in the spectrum of human thoughts without creating a contradiction or using glib of preachers in bypassing and jumping over those contradictions. I want to show that if modern science tries in denying my argument it similarly has to jump and bypass its own contradictions. In this way I'll be able to demonstrate a unified outlook. Exciton is something in a spectrum - spectrum of artificial elements - that has been created in a very unusual conditions. It is part of the nature but man cannot find it in the nature. On the other hand, I want to show that an instance of the language has been created by the modern man that puts locks and knots on the human mind and when the man tries to open it, that instance overpower the human mind and converts it to a new lock and knot such that when man believes that he is opening and opening he is sealing and locking and knotting. He makes the wall around his individuality thicker and thicker and imprison him in a prison that there is no escape for him but it is crystal clear and hurdle-less for intrusion of Satan and inflicting of pain, misery and hopelessness upon man. I want to show that we modern humans cannot and are not allowed to communicate with each other and when we do it, Satan assertively and immediately outreaches to us to punish us. This is the panopticon that some recent humans have recognised as the last retreat of humans into his loneliness.Peter Joneshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03192918305428815983noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25366947.post-28926382095839007022011-07-26T05:43:00.000-07:002012-01-22T04:56:19.608-08:00Excitons and Psychoanalyst (2)First, allow me to discuss exciton in nature. When you dope some impurity in a semiconductor material, inside the crystal structure of that material you can create an additional electron coupled with a lack of electron (a positive hole). They act like a Hydrogen atom: Hole is a light weight positive charge with a mass a little more than mass of an electron. You can create many of these atoms. All modern electronics and lasers and LED's are working on this basis. There is a hope that you can create such an immense concentration of Excitons to turn them into a metallic form similar to metallic hydrogen. (Hydrogen is actually a metal with properties similar to lithium and sodium, but it shows those physical metalic properties, such as electrical conduction, under unbelievable pressure to keep its atom in a metallic structure.) Then there is a hope that you can increase concentration of doping to degenerate that metal into a superconductor (similar to super-conducting high temperature metallic hydrogen ); a superconductor inside a semiconductor. In that case it is possible to manufacture computer parts that do not need cooling and can work with a torch battery. They do it, though in fifty years. Then what is a hole in our ball room party? It does not exist on the dance floor as far as all dancers are paired. When there comes an unpaired individual, the dance floor becomes a little excited due to that presence, but not enough to create an Exciton, as far as the dance lattice remains stiffed due to a calm music. It should become excited by applying a more exciting music to the environment. When an unpaired individual enters then a hole is created. What is that? It is an effect due to presence of an unpaired one. It becomes created with speed of infinity (in nature we do not have speed more than speed of light, but that hole defies that postulate). It is non-causal: Hole is there before its cause enters the room. It is not the matter. It is somewhere. It is a spirit. You know the room is full of holes waiting to grab an unpaired individual, when excited.Peter Joneshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03192918305428815983noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25366947.post-32033900325565719642011-06-24T12:03:00.000-07:002011-07-26T03:55:40.164-07:00Excitons and PsychoanalystIn older posts, I described briefly about some modern observations in nature of chemical elements. I talked about anti-matter and artificial elements and nonperceivable elements such as muoniums. I left out one important case and that is the exciton. This element is created when nothingness becomes excited! It exists but in twilight of existence. What is the use of such thing in the nature. All you see right now in screen of your computer is due to such existence. Assume you are inviting equal numbers of girls and boys to a school ball. You expect people become paired when the band plays a cheek-to-cheek. what happens if a girl or a guy does not get their invitation card on-time. You are lacking a coupling place; some one remains alone. If you make the environment excited enough by changing the music to a more modern rhythm, the lonely person can snatch his/her couple from a pair and makes the other partner alone. The left alone individual can do the same with the nearest couple and this can create an additional observable commotion rippling over the dancing motions of people. There is an empty place for one missed individual but it seems as filled by the excitement. You can say one person is dancing with a bubble, with a "hole!" There is a couple there created by excitation, compensating the absent guest.They look as a natural couple similar to others. This "hole" dancer only is a bit more heavier and sluggish than all other dancers in turning and bending and other motions. You can create senarios and by taking snap shots from above the dance floor calculating weight of this invisible dancer. You can 'inject' a spare partner from opposite door of the ball room until two single dancers meet up in the centre of the room, the hole gets filled. Suddenly, all will have their partners, shout in relaxation and the excitement fades out; many scenarios, just "gedanken." The couple might win the fruit basket of the best dancers of the night and the umpire calls the "exciton couple" as the winner. Remains where is psychoanalysis in this discussion?Peter Joneshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03192918305428815983noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25366947.post-5618812050811854342011-06-22T01:55:00.000-07:002011-06-22T07:37:32.320-07:00Why Psychoanalyst? (3)Psychoanalysis, in its original advertisements of its founder, has touched a vast arena of human rituals and their relation with some phenomena seen in certain groups of humans, described as neurosis. Psychoanalysis in its endeavour to discover that had to investigate remote concepts such as totems, taboos, and the role of phallus and the role of the primitive ruler and the role of father in human societies. It explains ideas such as patricide and regicide and the feeling of guilt. As said ingenuity of the founder was not followed with an integration of his ideas in a more unified and honest approach of his advertisers. Do not make a mistake and do not accuse me that I am knowing him a prophet. Let me clear me. It is an analogy that I use. He was like a prophet, honestly advertising his findings as a scientist should, but his followers were like preachers who advertise a religion as a career to earn a sustenance of worldly values, some vehemently, some hopelessly, and some with no appetite at all. I said my talks about this branch of human knowledge has as much use for me as my talks about proton and RNA. Messiah, is a defender, but not more than that. Messiah is not follower. Others are follower. Messiah is the balance and the gauge for others. Others are connections and nodes to connect to Him: not to connect anything to him, but to connect He to Him; to connect Man to Man, to connect the entire existence to existence. In first emergence's of human societies, we have family: mother, father, children and grandchildren, ruler, and an entity there: he is the witch, or medicine man, or something around this concept. There are details. For instance, father was not there similar to what we then had until now. Mother was. She was carrying the result of human regeneration and hence attachment was to her. Father could be anyone. Psychoanalyst discovered that the male child of human has a hidden tendency to eliminate his father. (Regretfully, later these novel ideas fell in the hands of brothel runners.) In place of father there was the uncle. This uncle was brother of mother. He was the mirror that could inspire the male child. Look! Pieces of puzzle are here. Abraham had no father, brought up by his uncle. Generations after generations people never asked why. But Abraham means father of people. He established fatherhood. His fatherhood established by many rituals that needs to be investigated. Moses had no father. You do not know the story in this way, none of you. His name shows that: Moses, taken from the water. Jesus had no father. His father was god. Next and the last one was also known as the "Mohammad the Waif" These stories later has been modified by the preachers to alter the life of these greatest unique personalities of humans to become similar to a spoiled prince or a hero of no value with many similar entities born everyday in a corner of the Earth.Peter Joneshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03192918305428815983noreply@blogger.com0