Messiah Psychoanalyst

More on Holes and on Dance Floor

2012-01-22T05:26:00.000-08:00

You know the room is full of holes waiting to grab an unpaired individual, when excited. I said that already: One individual enters the party without his couple accompanying him. He has left alone. All couples are dancing. He is watching. Until the music becomes more exciting and more groovy, then couples "coupling" becomes loose and also the lone boy becomes excited towards rugged edge of the dancing people and grabs the next girl at the edge nearest to him. The girl's partner grabs one from the inner crowd and so on. We said, assume at the same time a lone girl enters from the diagonally opposite door and starts the same process. We said each one has got an opposite sex hole with them. Therefore we have two holes in the room: one girl and one boy. We said we can actually arrange experiments to take picture from them. We said they are not as groovy as others but a bit sluggish. And there will be a point in the middle that they reach together. Now all people are paired. What happens to our hole couples? They go and sit on chairs at a corner waiting if new singled out individual arrives. They have not names. They are not invited. They do not know how to dance. They do not have any acquaintances in the crowd. They do not have a body. They are just nobody. They just wait for a lonely individual and an excited dance floor to start to groove. How many of them exists? There is no difference. Holes do not exist at all. You can say, many pairs, or just one or just none, until the floor becomes degenerated: If you invite fifty couple and forty of them come singled then with no genre of musics you are able to excite the dance floor.

Man in Panopticon

2011-08-07T10:47:00.000-07:00

I have written frequently that my aim is not to prove the god and religion by using science. Modern science and the idea of god and religion as we know them are contradictory. I said that I do not mean that the idea of god is good for the psychological benefits of human and giving him comfort and insight for his daily behaviour or inspire and frighten him towards a better moral behaviour. Everything that you claim is so vast and vaguely understood by man that excludes me to commit. Each claim goes into the realm of dedicated scholarships of individuals and groups of people. Why should god sends his son or a messenger who has a very partial knowledge of human affairs let alone to help them to eternal salvage. Messiah only brings some news and some people could only believe him and mostly people could not believe except by conversion, by a sudden transformation of soul. I have shown the contradictory nature of these two discourse: science and religion. Hence, what is all that about the excitons and psychoanalysis? I want to show that there are things that are conceivable. I want to show that the idea of god and Satan is in the spectrum of human thoughts without creating a contradiction or using glib of preachers in bypassing and jumping over those contradictions. I want to show that if modern science tries in denying my argument it similarly has to jump and bypass its own contradictions. In this way I'll be able to demonstrate a unified outlook. Exciton is something in a spectrum - spectrum of artificial elements - that has been created in a very unusual conditions. It is part of the nature but man cannot find it in the nature. On the other hand, I want to show that an instance of the language has been created by the modern man that puts locks and knots on the human mind and when the man tries to open it, that instance overpower the human mind and converts it to a new lock and knot such that when man believes that he is opening and opening he is sealing and locking and knotting. He makes the wall around his individuality thicker and thicker and imprison him in a prison that there is no escape for him but it is crystal clear and hurdle-less for intrusion of Satan and inflicting of pain, misery and hopelessness upon man. I want to show that we modern humans cannot and are not allowed to communicate with each other and when we do it, Satan assertively and immediately outreaches to us to punish us. This is the panopticon that some recent humans have recognised as the last retreat of humans into his loneliness.

Excitons and Psychoanalyst (2)

2011-07-26T05:43:00.000-07:00

First, allow me to discuss exciton in nature. When you dope some impurity in a semiconductor material, inside the crystal structure of that material you can create an additional electron coupled with a lack of electron (a positive hole). They act like a Hydrogen atom: Hole is a light weight positive charge with a mass a little more than mass of an electron. You can create many of these atoms. All modern electronics and lasers and LED's are working on this basis. There is a hope that you can create such an immense concentration of Excitons to turn them into a metallic form similar to metallic hydrogen. (Hydrogen is actually a metal with properties similar to lithium and sodium, but it shows those physical metalic properties, such as electrical conduction, under unbelievable pressure to keep its atom in a metallic structure.) Then there is a hope that you can increase concentration of doping to degenerate that metal into a superconductor (similar to super-conducting high temperature metallic hydrogen ); a superconductor inside a semiconductor. In that case it is possible to manufacture computer parts that do not need cooling and can work with a torch battery. They do it, though in fifty years. Then what is a hole in our ball room party? It does not exist on the dance floor as far as all dancers are paired. When there comes an unpaired individual, the dance floor becomes a little excited due to that presence, but not enough to create an Exciton, as far as the dance lattice remains stiffed due to a calm music. It should become excited by applying a more exciting music to the environment. When an unpaired individual enters then a hole is created. What is that? It is an effect due to presence of an unpaired one. It becomes created with speed of infinity (in nature we do not have speed more than speed of light, but that hole defies that postulate). It is non-causal: Hole is there before its cause enters the room. It is not the matter. It is somewhere. It is a spirit. You know the room is full of holes waiting to grab an unpaired individual, when excited.

Excitons and Psychoanalyst

2011-06-24T12:03:00.000-07:00

In older posts, I described briefly about some modern observations in nature of chemical elements. I talked about anti-matter and artificial elements and nonperceivable elements such as muoniums. I left out one important case and that is the exciton. This element is created when nothingness becomes excited! It exists but in twilight of existence. What is the use of such thing in the nature. All you see right now in screen of your computer is due to such existence. Assume you are inviting equal numbers of girls and boys to a school ball. You expect people become paired when the band plays a cheek-to-cheek. what happens if a girl or a guy does not get their invitation card on-time. You are lacking a coupling place; some one remains alone. If you make the environment excited enough by changing the music to a more modern rhythm, the lonely person can snatch his/her couple from a pair and makes the other partner alone. The left alone individual can do the same with the nearest couple and this can create an additional observable commotion rippling over the dancing motions of people. There is an empty place for one missed individual but it seems as filled by the excitement. You can say one person is dancing with a bubble, with a "hole!" There is a couple there created by excitation, compensating the absent guest.They look as a natural couple similar to others. This "hole" dancer only is a bit more heavier and sluggish than all other dancers in turning and bending and other motions. You can create senarios and by taking snap shots from above the dance floor calculating weight of this invisible dancer. You can 'inject' a spare partner from opposite door of the ball room until two single dancers meet up in the centre of the room, the hole gets filled. Suddenly, all will have their partners, shout in relaxation and the excitement fades out; many scenarios, just "gedanken." The couple might win the fruit basket of the best dancers of the night and the umpire calls the "exciton couple" as the winner. Remains where is psychoanalysis in this discussion?

Why Psychoanalyst? (3)

2011-06-22T01:55:00.000-07:00

Psychoanalysis, in its original advertisements of its founder, has touched a vast arena of human rituals and their relation with some phenomena seen in certain groups of humans, described as neurosis. Psychoanalysis in its endeavour to discover that had to investigate remote concepts such as totems, taboos, and the role of phallus and the role of the primitive ruler and the role of father in human societies. It explains ideas such as patricide and regicide and the feeling of guilt. As said ingenuity of the founder was not followed with an integration of his ideas in a more unified and honest approach of his advertisers. Do not make a mistake and do not accuse me that I am knowing him a prophet. Let me clear me. It is an analogy that I use. He was like a prophet, honestly advertising his findings as a scientist should, but his followers were like preachers who advertise a religion as a career to earn a sustenance of worldly values, some vehemently, some hopelessly, and some with no appetite at all. I said my talks about this branch of human knowledge has as much use for me as my talks about proton and RNA. Messiah, is a defender, but not more than that. Messiah is not follower. Others are follower. Messiah is the balance and the gauge for others. Others are connections and nodes to connect to Him: not to connect anything to him, but to connect He to Him; to connect Man to Man, to connect the entire existence to existence. In first emergence's of human societies, we have family: mother, father, children and grandchildren, ruler, and an entity there: he is the witch, or medicine man, or something around this concept. There are details. For instance, father was not there similar to what we then had until now. Mother was. She was carrying the result of human regeneration and hence attachment was to her. Father could be anyone. Psychoanalyst discovered that the male child of human has a hidden tendency to eliminate his father. (Regretfully, later these novel ideas fell in the hands of brothel runners.) In place of father there was the uncle. This uncle was brother of mother. He was the mirror that could inspire the male child. Look! Pieces of puzzle are here. Abraham had no father, brought up by his uncle. Generations after generations people never asked why. But Abraham means father of people. He established fatherhood. His fatherhood established by many rituals that needs to be investigated. Moses had no father. You do not know the story in this way, none of you. His name shows that: Moses, taken from the water. Jesus had no father. His father was god. Next and the last one was also known as the "Mohammad the Waif" These stories later has been modified by the preachers to alter the life of these greatest unique personalities of humans to become similar to a spoiled prince or a hero of no value with many similar entities born everyday in a corner of the Earth.

Original Sin? (2)

2011-06-01T10:08:00.000-07:00

We understood that the only sin is the creation in an arena that everything is hostile to the creation. Everything is dying. Everything is destroying to the most delicate of all: the life. That hostility remains accompanying and chasing, intriguing the ascending being towards descend and annihilation. It is a wound, not healing ever, left back. It remains as a whisper in the ear, in the mind, in the existence of the upwardness of creation. It looks for a lapse for a wink to overcome and take everything back. It accumulates more and more when creation soars higher and higher. That is the pain. It happens that that pain falls on the shoulder of man with all of its heaviness. It is offered to heavens. It is offered to mountains. None accept. They say we draw lot whom his name comes out he carries it. But then they cheat. They write on all the ballots only one name; only Messiah's name. And when they draw the lot it comes to Messiah to carry it. It is the cross that Messiah carries. Son of God, man, sacrifices for the sake of creation. He tolerate all the pains of the wound that He has created in creation. He tolerates for the original sin of man - original sin of God - creation. And Antichrist remains in the back fallen and defeated again dying and burning in his jealousy of witnessing the creation and evolving of the human mind.

Why Psychoanalyst? (2)

2011-04-25T02:50:00.000-07:00

Psychoanalysis is a human achievement and supposedly is very materialistic and takes god from the arena of human life and knows other factors affecting human destiny. First, I said that I am talking with modern human and his modern mind in modern words. I am empty of any religion. All cults and religions and ideas existing at this time are part of career of a group of people and they are not for connection to the God. People who consume those products might benefit or might use it as some remedies for their daily pains but at the end they might become confused of inherent contradictions of those teachings with their modern mind. I already used some facts and findings of modern mind such as proton and RNA and muonium to navigate ahead. But I have used the psychoanalyst for my Blog and my web site names. I use this similarly for navigation only, until it remains the truth with its shininess. Second, this word, psychoanalyst, and part of its methods of interpretation of the human soul have been subjected to abuse by any type of preachers from its own discipline of psychology to every domain of day to day life of humans. Normally, I do not mention any name, since I am not writing any science here to cite names of discoverers and scientists. As psychoanalysis has huge impact on and blurring boundaries with religion I have to talk a paragraph about it. I did not write such a paragraph, say, about proton because people have been so frightened by modern science to interfere, or doubt about that modern ecclesiastical. Hence, they take it granted and I could move smoothly in that part. When it comes to the soul of humans, then everybody has a firm idea that cannot be disputed and he could abuse words in expanding anything from any beginning proposition to any ending proposition. Psychoanalysis established with vast discoveries about human soul at the beginning of twentieth century similar to modern physics. Its difference with modern physics was that, after its founder, it was not guarded by the same zeal as modern physics and it did not enjoy to be flourished and ramified with equal ingenuity of minds compareable to the founder of psychoanalysis, similarly. As the flow of science started to move towards the new world, it soon married with money and became arena of banality. Media used it to promote consumption of sex products. Governments and politics used it to opiate people with a scientific-like reasoning. Preachers and mushrooming cults used it to preach any idea. It became the language of generalised non-sense that can be interpreted by the audience individual suppositions. Until now that, everyday millions of words are pushed into the minds of humans as the pshychoanalyst insights. Gradually it is becoming the tool of Satan for corrupting the language of human, The Words. Humans, making their tower towards the heaven towards reaching to the God and bringing him down, become corrupted in the language and they lose communications with each other ever increasingly.

Original Sin

2011-04-10T01:46:00.000-07:00

Hence, god made a "mistake" who created man and Satan rebelled. Then why religions are obsessed with the original sin of the man? Because it is wrongly understood. Satan appears in the arena at the same point that man appears on the stage. Satan is interwoven with human. Son of the God should pay back for the original sin of man. But it is supposed that the Son is a different entity from the man and He should pay for him. God sacrifices His own Son for the sin of man. Already Abraham should sacrifice his son for a promise to God. God had asked him to do such a sacrifice. But later god sent the angel to inform Abraham that it had been just a test of his faith and obedience towards the god. We are on the track of discovery of an old, an ancient story but otherwise a wisdom, a wisdom of the past by putting pieces of time tormented puzzle together. We have to figure out what could be the parts that we have not found but actually existed at the dawn of human civilisation in its recent and more sophisticated form. What man saw at that time that he recorded in this way, and it is full of inspiration for all humans on the earth through the history. Why so many passionate heads climb voluntarily on the gallows of history to defend different forms of this story without asking a reward and they become the most admired characters remaining on the hearts of humans century after century. Messiah says, "There is no original sin committed by man. It is 'mistake' of god in creation of man that has been interpreted wrongly as the sin of man." When you cut a piece of marble from the mountain to create a statue its empty place remains as a sin in the mountain; by chiseling out each piece that sin becomes greater. Your sin remains in the form of geometry of the created piece to the end of time. Your sin accompanies the beauty of your creation. The hollow in the mountain screams to take your creation back and that hollow remains there as a wound. They both appear at the same point and intertwine together. The hollow seduce the beauty all the time and frighten him of going back to shapelessness that he had. RNA comes into the world not by the fear of hunger but by the fear that it has not a backup in the world if he suffers annihilation. Hence he creates himself again and again. He takes chemicals from the world and leaves hollow in their place. He weaves them like the most perfect artist, perfect with the whole meaning of the perfection. He weaves them with not even a slightest difference into his own form, by watching his beautiful face in the mirror of space-time and puts them in a corner of the gallery. This exhibition gallery is full of similar artworks, in shape, form and colors and shadings, but in the eyes of beholder who is the only lonely guest there, all are consummate of artifacts; all are masterpieces in splendour. Up is freezing cold and lacking the chemicals for the sculptor. Down is hot and molten. He occupies diligently, all that is possible to occupy, to the deepest down and to the highest up and extends the dominion of his creation. He is here to stay.

Why Psychoanalyst?

2011-02-25T05:01:00.000-08:00

They teach to children that during the Moses' time witches and their witchcraft were the most important feat one could achieve. During the Jesus' era medicine was considered the prodigy to follow. During Muhammad's time and place creating literature was what one should show to gain the attention of public. Perhaps you might think that I have selected psychoanalysis as people of our time are infatuated with that kind of rhetoric to be compelled to follow. In all of those childish catechisms you are wrong. It is the idea of preachers who believe these historical figures are extraordinary humans or demi-gods with perfections in talents of humans as the winners of some Olympiad games. I heard from one follower of Muhammad that formula for solving the quartic equations could be extracted from their holly book. He was familiar only with a high school basic algebra and that problem seemed very difficult for him. I have had a look at the holly books of Abraham's descendants including Muhammad and also at the holly books of Buddhists and Zoroastrians. There is nothing about witchcraft or medicine or literature or equations in them. You can exhaust all of them in one sentences: God is gracious and human has an enemy in a corner that is so easily can be seen but even god cannot over-power it. That was all. That entity, called Satan, wages a war against the God on the excuse of the "mistake" of god in creation of human. It knows that the God exists; in certitude, not like humans in all the time doubt. It knows that the God is almighty and omnipotent. It KNOWS. But in the face of god, It rebels. Modern humans, in spite of accepting the idea of god among ninety-five percent of them, if asked about their belief, become perplexed admitting such trivial contradicting story. Satan declares war against god but god has no asset to be violated but His humble creature, the man. (My Christian friend, now do you understand why Christ is the son of the Lord?) Such a vast universe is of no value for invasion of Satan except a feeble couple that god has created as His only sign of power. The amazing quad-polar neutron star was not enough for God to appreciate His own power. God could only be satisfied if a human discovers that. Hmm? Hence, Satan an angel in a corner unknown to god came out of its amorphous background he had among other angels at the same time that man was created. After finishing delivering Its ultimatum to god it sneaks into the Paradise, the honey moon resort god booked for the newly coupled, to corrupt the man and his wife.

How to Win?

2011-02-03T16:01:00.000-08:00

Hence, proton only stays but RNA stays and replicates. He builds him times and times again. He is one step upper. Man stays and replicates and "knows" that there should be one step upper than RNA. Proton has a doubt that he can stays so joggles all the time its constituents to become sure. RNA has doubt that it can stays and it actually has one of himself -replicated- in a corner. Hence it replicates and replicates. Man joggles with his mind all the time to quench the thirst of doubt he has got about being a mind. We know that there are myriad of stages between being a proton and being an RNA. There are myriads of stages between being an RNA and being a man. But those stages are not sharp enough to help to define a special position for them. We know there are groups of people who interpret world scientifically to deduce existence of God from those interpretations. For instance, they say there should come together say sixty or seventy factors to make the creation of life on earth possible. Say in solar system earth should be in a narrowly defined distance from the Sun and from the Jupiter and should have a moon of this size, pattern of radiation of the Sun, iron core of the earth, spatial coordination of carbon orbitals, polarity of water molecule and its amazing angle (between hydrogen bonds). Yes, I admit that it is fascinating but in terms of understanding of beyond they are not more amazing than this: How can you become millionaire in a night in a casino? Assume you shuffle cards and the outcome of the shuffling be a straight flush for you. Are you a winner, guaranteed? Definitely, no; since you are a winner if at least one opponent has got a hand near to yours to multiply the table "pot." Best is that you shuffle in a way that everybody has got a good hand. Normally in the next round you lose all you have earned except that the same pattern of hands happens to you. If you win quite a few hands, some large size but otherwise polite employees of the casino inform you that you look too tired out to be allowed to remain in casino just due to their concern for your health. Hence, what is the likeliness that shuffling of brand new cards becomes tandem together for you and your opponents and with a fair casino who let you win all through the night? Now, try to figure out the likeliness of the next story. There are rare fluctuations in nature that break all the laws of nature based on pure statistics. For example, it can cause half of the water in the glass in front of you boils and the other half becomes frozen as the expense for boiling the other half. This is against the laws of thermodynamics, but it is probable. Any thermodynamic event can have such a free paid casino winning. What is the odd that you can take on a jet-liner and it takes you to your destination by such a gamble wining process? Having said that, there are fluctuations that can happen in a very remote future of the world even after all the black holes who devoured all the galaxis then, they themselves become evaporated and all the most stable nucleon of irons (which are even more stable than black holes) become evaporated and the universe turns to an amorphous uniform, almost in zero degree Kelvin, magma of "leptons" those fluctuations can act against the odds and do the impossible and create a world. The first hand is not a winner. Needs another fluctuation. The second hand is winner but has not good hands for opponents. It shuffles and serves hands until a tandem of shuffles and servings set you behind a computer but without a nose so the world collapse to another round of shuffling until everything is at their right and correct places as this moment. Next round of shuffles should sustain the physical laws of the universe to prevent its collapse back to an unknown situation. Why this story is probable but your casino night is not? It is because if you want to win in that way in the casino you should own all the money of the world and the night should be as long as a million nights. That amorphous magma has all the necessary materials and a time to infinity so it can shuffle and serve until it wins. As if children are playing with fake money and show their cards to their opponents when they feel pity for him. I told this story to say that those groups with their rare fascinating sixty seventy factors of life cannot over-power a serious atheist equipped with story of fluctuations. If you do that you are continuing to admit your ignorance. You have to retire your proposition until the next discovery amaze you. You cannot prove anything. Still, if you are a preacher of a religion you might decide that those amazing findings might help your audience to juggle with their minds to discover, what they can discover, alone into a conversion and transcend of their minds towards higher tiers of evolution.

Story of Prophets

2010-12-04T09:07:00.000-08:00

If people become partitioned towards Antichrist then they'll become partitioned towards Messiah. Then it changes to a fair game of humans not something beyond affairs of daily life. Part of suffering of Messiah and all the prophets is that they become left lonely and unbelieved and mocked at. They should not share their visions with groups of people, as they could not. We said that people should accept this phenomenon as a conversion of faith not by evidences and proofs but by hints and road maps. Perhaps you have heard or are familiar with the Socrates' notion of dialectic. One should annihilate all attributes that make a phenomenon shared, and owns in common with other phenomena until at the end of annihilation one gets to that phenomenon that he is studying with all its pureness and carved out of its background, solid and existing and tangible in front of him, until he become sure that that phenomenon actually exists in its reality, all sparkling and shining and eye dazzling and all beingness. At the beginning you believe that you are killing that phenomenon by denying everything for him, but at the end it comes out more alive for you than anything else. If Messiah stays longer among us, he is describing prophets, Jesus, Muhammad, Moses, Abraham in a new way for modern human. For the faithfuls of those religions, at first it might come heavy to accept but then they appreciate that if those people have had something related to all the creation then believing them as philosophers, orators, physicians, shrewd merchant, converter of water to wine or to blood is actually degrading them to ordinary humans with similar interests. All of them were face to face to Antichrist, to that carrier of the most profane. It is not that Antichrist was only at the time of Jesus Christ. That entity is part of the mission of all messengers of god, including Buddha and Zoroaster.

Anti-Christ Is a Real Phenomenon in Nature (3)

2010-10-29T12:44:00.000-07:00

Usually, I have read many ideas about "Ahriman" or Satan, other names for and the same entity as "Anti-Christ." They attribute such entity to a political character, sometimes to very cunning rich people, or to criminals. Such characters, if bad, or even worst of them are bad in the context of ordinary human experience. Their actions could be satanic but they are not Satan. Satan is a cosmological phenomenon. He, if we can use this pronoun for It, cannot commit itself to such engagements. That things is not here to become rich or famous or rule over the material world. It has a mission, as the enemy of humans, to eradicate the humanity. Not that to replace of something by bad things, but to substitute nothingness in place of beingness. He is enemy (of Messiah) by its nature and should concentrate all its activity towards fighting with Messiah. If It goes to politics, or acquiring wealth and power then people would become partitioned towards him as enemies or as friends. Then he would not be able to mobilize all the people but few, perhaps only one person left on the side of Messiah, as its mission is such a mobilisation. It is not the case that there is an Armageddon of usual armies to decide who wins who forfeit. Satan is extreme of slyness and treachery. When it becomes incarnated he can cheat "everybody" towards his chicanery. You have heard from teachings of religions that when God created man, all angels prostrated to submission to man but Satan, who said that it remains enemy to the man to the end. So Satan does not come to earth to buy and sell things or ask people to vote to him. He is friend with none. How such thing can happens in the material world. How can you find something who looks like a human and can communicate with humans (to urge them against Messiah) but do not engage in daily affairs of human. What power and specification it has that it can conduct such an Armageddon against the one man army of Messiah.

Anti-Christ is a real phenomenon in nature (2)

2010-10-26T04:28:00.000-07:00

Still, there were arguments that mind is the same as brain. Rearrangements of molecules in their ultimate happens in the material brain. It is as you say proton is just concentration of energy. You say that, it is just three quarks attached to each other. That kind of reasoning means that you even do not believe that there is such thing as brain. RNA is just an aggregate of hydrogen carbon nitrogen and oxygen with few other elements. We might left in a hollow of "nihil." Then there is the "good news" that you cannot reason for "nihil." You hear the good news and you cannot ignore it because you have a mind that recognizes it without you can help it. And that holy creature, "mind" also reasons to keep you integrated in favour of a controversy, as, "there is only nihil." Hence, reasoning for "nihil" is equivalent to reasoning for mind. Good news is that you exist in-spite of your reasoning against it. You can keep your "cool status" while at the same time you are enjoying secretively as a member of "boring kids club" of those who are here to stay. Proton knows that it is a new entity. It is not concentration of energy. It is equivalent (please calculate it using physics of high school)to myriads units of energy of sunshine shining to myriads square kilo-meters of empty space but gathered in the smallest possible volume to create next stages of existence. Proton knows that it refuges other wandering entities (electrons) and decaying entities (neutrons), whom without him will not have any role in the nature, in a safe haven of a family which is the first stone of the foundation of higher stages of beingness in nature. He cannot ignore such a good news by reasoning that he is just another name for arrangement of three quarks.

Anti-Christ is a real phenomenon in nature

2010-10-09T14:25:00.000-07:00

I already fully elaborated on the idea of a spectrum for natural phenomena. You observe something weak here then definitely you find its full-fledged happening somewhere else. You see this happens in a small scale then that can happen in a very large scale. I said, sometimes when you cannot find the whole spectrum in nature then human can create it artificially. Messiah and anti-Christ are also extreme of a phenomenon in nature that on a daily basis at any moment a human can experience in its mild and milder and mildest forms within himself and without in the aggregate of humans in the society. To further preparation for the discourse man should refer to his "mind." Mind of a human is the most complex and end product of the nature. Well, I do not mean the "brain." Even the brain of very advanced primates is also somehow extreme of creation of nature. Sometimes, one might be deluded, when he is reading about black holes and quarks and gluon's and these things that what surprises they have and you might forget that the surprise is not in those basic, simple, very crude and primitive objects of nature. The surprise exists in the tool that observes, studies and analyses them; not the brain, the human mind. Before going further one could be too stiff in protesting that there is only brain and talking of mind means that I want to bridge the gap and jump into the world of metaphysics and leave the physics behind. I might do it but in future. For now, I am using only physics. We have two sets and one function from one to the other. One is nature and the other set is the set of results of action of physical brain on the nature. Brain is the function. Result or in mathematical term, "image" of this function is mind. You might say it is only arrangement and re-arrangement of molecules. Well, saying just that, is the mind, not the brain. Your mind says that clause, not your brain. Why is it physics. We should go back to the entities who are here to stay. First object we could find was the proton. It emerged from the creation as an entity that does not "want" to decay and annihilate except that you force it. Then we noticed crystals. They "want" to stack and fill the space in spite of the fact that to do that they have to swim upstreams against the tendency of the nature, surrounding them in whole, who pushes them back. "Then we had RNA who 'wants' to stay by creating a replica of himself. He believes if he needs himself when he is decaying then he is there by presence of the replica," said so Messiah when he was asked why we multiply. I called those surprising objects, black holes, quarks, gluons, basic since RNA already was in those stages and could not find those stages enough to stay at, and evolved and evolved, until he - RNA - created the Paradise, the blue warm, wet, and friendly cradle for his own creation. Then he, I mean RNA, created water, methane, more complex chemicals. When everything was ready RNA was there. Then as he had aimed he started to put one back-up for him at each point on the earth. "I am everywhere and always here. Look, I am here. No, look at me I am here, no..here!" Then enemy could not decide which one is the original which one should be annihilated. Perhaps there is a mirror shattered in pieces and each is the beautiful face of Him, of the RNA? Enemy, the annihilator who presses the blue habitat from the above and from the below remained wandering in search of him forever. Shattered pieces of mirror carry the same and one thing. Each show the same face and when you put the jigsaw of the broken pieces together they show the same thing, an RNA who is here to stay. Those pieces are our minds and they are parts of our global mind jigsawed to make one. They are attached in unification but their projections into our local time space seems separated and enemy is wandering forever which one to annihilate. The enemy is one who has not that picture. So he is in search of that picture. Leave this sweet fable for now. Wake up back to the physics such that in a dialectic of physics and "non-"physics you can start to believe that you are here to stay. You already know that how proton is so stable and how RNA created as a replicator. If you do not know and you are interested you can go to school and learn it. Here you learned "why." Therefore, we negotiated that there is our mind as the result of evolution. We add that we have evolved drastically from a time-space localisations of some primitive magma of energy into the protons and we passed crucibles after crucibles until RNA and then fights and survivals into the shape of a human. You know how we started to walk on our hind legs until we had to twist our face ninety degrees downwards to be able to see front of us instead watching the sky when walking on our legs. (That tendency remained in our eyes to look in the old direction into the sky.) See, in each stage, at each milestone with the big gap that exists between them a transformation happens. The universe of that entity changes. He leaves a universe behind him. Proton never decays, RNA lays many of him everywhere. It is natural that we extrapolate for another surprise, for another revolution in evolution. That surprise does not exist somewhere else that we start to create tools and labs to discover it. That, in its very natural expectation, is continuation of our existence. We are at the head of the arrow and we are going towards it, knowing or not knowing.

What is Anti-Christ? (3)

2010-05-13T06:55:00.000-07:00

Before continuing, I must answer a question that might arise. Why am I speaking about Christ while the title is, "What is Anti-Christ?" It is because Anti-Christ is the shadow of darkness. It is a blank in a dark background that finds existence as a parasite to emergence of Christ in the material world. When I know what a Messiah is then the road is paved to acknowledge what Anti-Christ is.

***

People attribute miracles to Jesus or Moses or Mohammad. For instance, Jesus walked on water without submersion in the water. Assume some one comes to you, as a modern human, and tells you that he can walk on water and shows it to you. What happens to you, then? You know illusionists, do not you? People give them money and fame and comfort and applaud for what that people know only as a trick. Do you go and crucify illusionist. Do illusionists advertise any thing other than their jobs. Do they insist to the death that they are something else. What about in ancient time, the time of Jesus Christ? There were illusionists with their own tricks in those times, too. They also had status similar to modern ones in their societies. Sometimes they had claims of being something else. Their difference with Jesus Christ was that they were conforming to money, fame and applaud. Nobody can remember them later. If somebody without any illusion or trick genuinely can walk on the water an upheaval happens in the society. How people can remain indifferent, after that? Jesus Christ converted water to wine. He was from a tribe who were famous as good investors. How then they left him to be crucified in loneliness while he could convert cheap water to high quality wine? He did those miracles only once to show that he was genuinely the Son of the God; you might say. Well, he could arrange sessions for different groups of people, for people from the Temple, for Romans for different groups until news become accepted by everybody or by the most people that he was really the promised one. Then what was his mission? People would accept after those sessions that He was genuine. Now what should they do? What requirements should be fulfilled? What then? Should they go and do prayer day and night? Should they close the doors to themselves and dedicate themselves to God? Should they mobilise for a war. Do they need anything to do for bread for sustenance. Or Jesus Christ should provide for them similar to story of one bread for five thousands people. Muslims believe that Messiah (Mahdi) comes and opens the gold mines for them. It seems tests that humans put forward for being a Godly entity is more difficult to pass than tests that God puts forward for human salvation. For few dollars an hour people commit themselves to most dangerous jobs such as being a soldier in a war zone then what happens if some one comes and opens gold mines for them.Who might crucify such a benefactor? People rush and kiss the soil that he steps on.

What is Anti-Christ? (2)

2010-04-21T02:11:00.000-07:00

Therefore, we excluded Messiah of being a political leader, a rebellion, a general. No other occupation or extraordinary talent you might attribute to Messiah. One never says that Messiah is a great athlete, or a great violinist. The great violinist becomes a great violinist. A great athlete becomes a great athlete. Spartacus, the gladiator who rebelled near the time of Jesus Christ and had many great personal characteristics and cruelly was crucified was a great athlete and suffered what you might believe similar to Jesus Christ, but he only is remembered where and when you might remember Jesus Christ good messages and not by his own.

***

People might say that Jesus Christ was a great orator or a great philosopher. Around the time of Jesus Christ there were living very great orators such as Cicero, speaking in the mother tongue of Romans, great philosophers like Plotinus with deep understanding of God as an abstract entity in creation of the world. Ideas advertised by Jesus, or old testament, or Mohammad looks humble comparing with them. Do you know how great are Plato, and Aristotle, even in our modern philosophy? They were recognised already by the learned people of the time as having a sound and sane social position why Jesus Christ should be preferred who was companion of vagabonds and centre of attention of illiterate people. Learned people of temple did not argue with Jesus. They knew him of no intellectual value to argue with him in a valid way. This much was attitude of his own people, let alone Romans who were ruling half of the world and constantly were in conflict with rebels and native ideas and cultures behind those rebels. Frequently, they had to send big armies and finest generals and warriors and great amounts of bribes for opposing chieftains and warlords to settle such conflicts. They just did not consider to talk with Jesus for a second. They sent a couple of illiterate villain soldiers to finish whatever was the cause of the buzz. With no ordinary reason you ever know why each one of you hangs a cross of Jesus, or a star of David on his neck or one blows himself for the name of Mohammad, but name of Plotinus is hidden in few books in dusty libraries. Do you believe ideas of Marx with all greatness with all compassion that exists in them, with all mobilization that they have given to minds and hearts of modern man will endure a century from now? What is in their names, Jesus, Moses, Mohammad, Buddha that does not exist in Marx, Hegel, Plotinus, Plato, and Aristotle?

What is Anti-Christ?

2010-02-21T03:10:00.000-08:00

That helps me to explain further what Satan could be. Messiah is not busy fighting Satan like a normal usual fight with goals ascribed to other affairs of humans. If it was that should not be categorised as something supernatural. That would be included into other famous entities and would be remembered in the same way. Messiah should have a unique mission and position not volunteered by other individuals. The position already offered to heavens, to earth to mountains and all rejected to accept. It should be the lowest so that all humans loath to accept. Should be the most difficult such that no other human can achieve to fulfill. See, Julius Caesar was living around the time of Jesus Christ. He has no attribution to us, people who are living right now. Everything around him are like him. They are not of significance to us let alone die or live for them. He was a political military leader with extreme capacity of a conqueror; a general, a statesman with power over a big part of earth that even in present time is almost impossible to rule in unification without dispute. All the time try to compare him with Jesus Christ with his donkey, his worn out robe with humble voice and demeanour. Well, you say statesmen and political and military leaders with any capacity cannot project them on a long history of humans. Everybody whether on the side of Jesus or against him approve this assertion. So this excludes Jesus Christ long standing position among humans due to he being a political leader. That also excludes the idea that He had been any type of rebellion or revolutionary leader since that capacity belongs to a man who is on the path to become a statesman or a general or a conqueror, like Julius Caesar, but perhaps with a bit more agreeable slogans. We do not know any instance of a rebellion leader who ever had come to lead the mind of humans for long enough time to rival the position of Jesus Christ. But we keep such an idea for further examinations. We compare a rebel with Jesus Christ to ratify appropriateness of that leader as a just leader. But, conversely, we never compare Jesus Christ with a rebel leader to ratify capacities of Jesus Christ. People follow Jesus not for his art of planing a rebel. There are certain zealots of religions who try to attribute such art to Jesus. That more happens in followers of Mohammad and Moses since these two messengers of god had to show some political leadership in certain part of their lives. Similarly, for Jesus we saw that he needed food and sleeping, and He said that he had an earthly material being as he appeared among the sons of man. We should separate these two parts and we are doing this.

Disappointed?

2010-02-21T02:39:00.000-08:00

For the reasons I wrote in previous post, people searching to know about "Messiah" when they come here or to the Messiah's website become disappointed of not finding what they want. They want Messiah follow them in their religions and their desires. They wrongly believe Messiah is something as their private asset to help them to fight with the rival local church or to a rival religion. They believe Messiah should repair their Mosques and temples and start a war with infidels and sides for a group. We know Jesus Christ said that He belonged to all humanity even those who committed atrocity to him. One can deprive himself from Messiah but Messiah cannot deprive Him from the others. If Messiah is the peace and justice crystallised in form of human how could he be property of a certain faith or certain aggregate of people. That fact is true for Abraham, and Moses and Mohammad and Buddha and Zoroaster, too. They belong to all humanity. They all were the same element cast in different times. Where they are there is no time passing by so they are only one. No time passing Him by; He passes by the time. They pass by the time, seen to the eyes of humans as different people. All came to humans to suffer and to show to human that Satan, is their enemies. Ahriman can exist and can be seen by material eyes in the material form and every time Antichrist cheats the human again with the same trick and human repeats the original sin, as if no lesson has learned and then Messiah pays for the sin of man with suffering anew and save the humanity towards eternity, towards eternal existence towards "coming here to stay!"

Overcoming the Other Loud Voices

2010-01-27T04:18:00.000-08:00

Not all the campaign is with the scientific minds. It contains less than ten percent of the effort. There are more powerful sectors of the society to fight the idea of "Messiah" resurrection. Most of them are from previous religions. Many have a legacy of religion in their minds without practicing a religion or without being sacrilegious or atheist. If they are asked they claim themselves as, say, a Christian. Sometimes they say that their parents were belonged to such and such religion but they only believe in God or a super gracious being as the God. Many are deeply drenched in superstitions rather than being religious and normally the boundary between two is vague and blurred for them. There are fights inside them that which is the orthodoxy of religion and which are the superstitions from ancient stories and paganism among them. For a scientific minded atheist there is no difference between religion and superstition but inside the doctrine of religion such a boundary exist and is the subject of much controversy. For example, a monist theologian might become philosophically skeptical of the existence of the material world based on the idea that the Almighty abstract God why needs a material world to exist and how matter might emanate from the all abstract mind of God. Then he knows conceiving of the God as an old man on a throne a superstition of commoner masses and a blasphemy if that idea proposed by an educated priest. All the existing religions are based on the idea that their religion is the most perfect and ultimate instruction of God and they have a scientific positivist kind of reason for that as that after their prophet or messenger human beings have entered in a phase of being mature and grown up enough such that no further direct contact of human with the God is necessary anymore. Only if a bad happens to the faith it is because the followers do not carefully follow the rules as originally advertised by the God and their messenger and are written in their scripts. And, they assume, if they do that they can overcome to other religions and blasphemies and injustice that has gripped the earth.

How Much Knowledge?

2010-01-22T05:08:00.000-08:00

So far, hence, I put myself in front line of scientific thinking in campaigning with all superstitions already advertised by all religions regarding the "Messiah." In doing so I cannot eliminate further counter-claims of scientifically minded modern humans. How? For the first, because not all my readers who believe they are scientific minded are so as they assert. These are one group: assume that you are an atheist young student of engineering, then I assert that one cannot measure the position and velocity of a particle at the same time without sacrificing the precision of one quantity in favour of the second quantity. I further assert that it is inherent of nature; nature blocks your measurement not your skill, knowledge and tools. As my young atheist is not familiar with "Quantum Mechanics" and only he has got some familiarity with classical mechanics he might vilify me as saying a non-scientific proposition. Then he does not continue listening to me, rejecting everything as a whole erroneous package of frequently told and falsified dogmas of the antiquity. The second group could be time tasted people of some cultivation and education such as an artist, a physician, a journalist who have other dogmas wrongly and in a scrambled shape resided in their minds such as "Galileo Galilei proved that there was no God and any angel in the heaven by looking into a telescope and for this reason burnt at steak by the order of Inquisition!" They also do not listen any further to me. Another group does not come to the frontiers of human unknown for discovery. They are not eager to come. I cannot drag them to that place. There is another group who recognises the humble predicaments of vague origin as the scientific truth. One example of that I could find in a TV commercial that, "such a cream can eliminate the wrinkles of your face skin!" Said with a scientific tone. Then it was based on the (subjective) idea of eighty persons who used that cream.
A very important group I have found are those who seek "Messiah" as the embodiment, resurrectimn, of their ancient prophet. That could be true but needs and waits for your investigation to prove or reject.

Superstitious?

2010-01-08T03:33:00.000-08:00

People have become scientific minded these days. They say, the idea of Messiah is fanaticism, superstition and something belonged to past times when people could not solve the problems of nature and had to attribute them to one or more super beings. Although all of these propositions are easily subject to challenge, I have tried not to become engaged with them until I feel that the backgrounds and foundations are built enough. So far, I have not said anything that could be in contradiction to any scientific achievements of human. In contrast, I have refuted, doubted and rejected any previous idea regarding this phenomenon, Messiah, as it is taught mostly by religions.On the other hand, I do not say that such an idea, the Messiah is weird and rejected. By no means it is so. Almost more than ninety five percent of humans deeply believe in a way or other way in such phenomenon among them very great living and deceased scientists. Many people, earn money by publishing books and gathering people and associations and organizations, even armies and fans around them, selling this idea to masses and masses of humans. Nothwithstanding, they are in the first line of defence together with sacreligious groups if such a person with all correct descriptions attributed to him emerges in front of their face.

Conversion of Faith

2010-01-04T14:09:00.000-08:00

I discussed many sound scientific ideas, so far, to show that my claim for existence of Messiah in nature, similar to other phenomena, is within the reach of investigation of ordinary humans. Although, I reiterate that believing it, at the end, is a matter of conversion. This conversion can be seen in every aspect of scientific and daily life. For example, you have seen that repeatedly you want to prove a fact for your colleague, for your spouse, for your students and children. They do not accept it from you. This is the nature of human (and other beings) for protection of integrity of its individuals. Overweight people do not accept your advice. Smokers do not accept your advice. People of high blood pressure do not commit them to a diet. All these happen in face of scientifically proven and globally observable facts. Suddenly, one smoker quits and never comes back to smoking. One overweight becomes slim. The seriousness of some of these facts is a matter of life and death, a matter of better life and more miserable life. Still, only a conversion of faith can help the victim to accept the scientific propositions involved. All the time human finds the devil easier to follow than what is good for him. Human is not rational. That irrationality is part of his nature to sustain his existence against unpredictable and random adversaries. If human was rational then his blue print and pattern of life would become revealed for his adversaries, the destructive forces of nature, and they could foil human plans for survival. Human and other animals are like guerrillas fighting deep inside the enemies territories. They should not carry any identification, weapon or anything that makes their enemies suspicious. If suddenly an engagement with enemy patrols occurred they should be able to use any improvised idea against it. This is partly physical, partly spiritual and partly definable in terms of "information." For example, language or dance in humans are such weapons. I used the term spiritual. It has my own meaning here. By that I do not mean preaching anything you already familiar with.

Future of Human Beings: Version Two

2009-12-16T08:13:00.000-08:00

At these days, it is possible that if some one's heart becomes very ill, they replace it for him if a donor heart can be found. What is bad about it? Nothing! It makes your life longer. Well, it has not details of the original heart. For example you do not enjoy exercise. You do not have blood pressure and feedback to your mind in that sense. Exercise is the fight with death. You already had lost that fight. It is better, notwithstanding, than being all dead. But don’t worry Herr Sinclair¹. Sooner or later they will be able to clone your heart with all of its nerves in-place. They put a seed there and it grows into your genetically natural heart. They'll do it though it takes one hundred years from now. You do not believe? In nineteen oh six university professors of fluid dynamics were teaching their students that if a train gets a speed more than one hundred and forty miles (200 Kilometers per hour)the air inside the wagons would vacuum out and nobody survives. Therefore they believed no machine could fly due to the fact that it should accelerate to two hundred kilometres per hour and air being vacuumed kills any passenger. Now it has passed one hundred years and millions are flying everyday without any suffocation. They are going to do that ‘in-place’ and 'fast' cloning with other parts of your body, too, if you are damaging them or if they become old and dysfunction. What if your head explodes on your way to holiday on Mars? Then you are beyond economic repair. Happily a solution exists. From the time that you are born from the incubator (nobody will toil to become pregnant in those days) a small chip transmits, uploads, all your moment-by-moment experience of life to a secure centre to be kept on a yotta-byte sim-card. The uploaded information includes, among other things, details of all biochemistry of your body (emotions) at any moment of your life. That sim-card, then, is ‘you’! If something happens to your brain, they clone all of ‘you’ and download your ‘you’ from your sim-card to your brain and you restart (reboot) from the moment after brain death. You even have the experience of the moment of that accident, beyond the point of death. Well, they do it say in one thousand year from now, but they'll do it. Then why do you need any ‘body’ at all?
You can remain a sim-card forever and inside that 'you' can create books and planets and galaxies and population and friends and get energy from sunshine and live forever. You can create images of sim-cards who like caricatures believe that they exist and can walk and have philosophical minds, and while they are just passing of humble photonic pulses (or what I may call it in future) inside your sim-card, they figure out big pictures about creation and aims of their supposed universe. How they can wake up from that horror, from their nightmare?
==================================
foot note: 1. Herr Sinclair, by Hermann Hesse

Future of Human Beings: Version One

2009-12-16T06:14:00.000-08:00

Hundred billion years ago there was a whim but there was not a world
Ten billion years ago there was a universe but there was not the Earth
One billion years ago there was the earth but nobody was walking there
Hundred million years ago there was something walking there but it was not an ape
Ten million years ago there was an ape but it was not a man
One million years ago there was a man but he had not fire.
Hundred thousand years ago there was a fire but there was not a village
Ten thousands years ago there was a village but there was not a book
Thousand years ago there was a book but nobody could fly
Hundred years ago they could fly but not to the moon
Ten years ago they went to moon but not to the mars
Now they can go to mars but they have not enough money
After ten years they’ll have money but not for every one
After hundred years everyone goes there but they whim to put Jupiter ablaze
After thousand years they put Jupiter ablaze but they cannot move the sun
After ten thousand years they do it then they like to move the galaxy
After hundred thousand years they move the Milky Way but remains the remaining of the universe
After a million years they engineer the whole universe but they want to conquer the time
After ten million years they conquer the time and the space but they cannot push them to one point
After hundred million years they can push them to one point but they do not know what else they want
After a billion years they know what they want: a whim.
After hundred billion years they’ll have that whim
So they'll create me
And with that, the universe.
I become the father of God.

Then What?

2009-12-10T04:15:00.000-08:00

I talked about some phenomena that modern human has beheld.Among all of them I find the idea of "muonium" most useful for my objective. It appears in the world of atoms and molecules in a short time. When it goes into that society, into aggregate of hydrogens working inside the chemicals, none of them hydrogen or others recognize IT as a strange phenomenon, as something that does not belong to world of elements. IT becomes co-occupant with hydrogen in the same box. IT looks as if IT is a hydrogen. Nobody recognize IT as stranger. IT is not a bad thing in ordinary definition of bad. IT is not good. It is not useless. IT is not useful. The essence of the truth is that that IT just does not belong to the world of elements. IT is a look-alike. No world is conceived of being built out of Muoniums. There is no such a goal or such a capacity in muonium to exist and IT is of no help for other elements in achieving such a goal. IT has something, an electron of our world, in ITs outer shell that confuses the other elements. But in the core it is a muonium. IT is not a proton to fuel, to taste and to flourish the existence of the universe. IT is just a flare of a moment, a sparkle of a fire work that attracts the eyes of children. I used the capital letters and pronoun "IT" for thae muonium to pave the way for future use of this as an unstable hypothetical element. I also might use that with a bracket, "[IT]" in fashion of chemistry for radicals in a reaction.

Some Chemistry: Artificial Elements, Anti-matter, Artificial Atoms (3)

2009-12-01T05:44:00.001-08:00

The third kind of elements I discuss are the artificial atoms. Now these never happen or occur in nature. Not that they are very unstable and annihilate soon after their creation but also that they are impossible to exist in nature. Briefly, an atom in our world is a positive charge surrounded and encircled by an equal amount of negative charges. The centre material is very dense and very heavy comparing with the encircling entity which is very light and some how in a considerable distance whirling round the centre. In the simplest form, hydrogen is one heavy positive charge, called a proton surrounded by one electron of equal negative charge. This has specific chemical behaviour that causes it to be in a specific place of its own in the table of elements. This is a natural atom. Equally in the anti mater world we have an anti-atom of a negative charged centre encircled by a positive electrons. This one is also a natural creation in its own world. Now, people have been successful to create endless streams of positively charged electrons (that is, anti-electrons of anti-matter world). If they slow down this stream of positive electrons to a certain speed they can capture negative electrons of our world to encircle the positive electrons as if the negative electrons have mistaken them with the centre of hydrogen. These two, positive electron in centre and negative electron encircling and turning around it, create an artificial atom that behaves just like a hydrogen in its chemical properties, although the centre is not heavy like the centre of hydrogen. But in having a positive charge it is completely like the hydrogen centre. This artificial atom does not belong to any conceived world. Well, they are very short living comparing with any life span in this world, but people could investigate that whatever you can do chemically with hydrogen you can do with this atom which is called "positronium." (Scientists call a positive-charge electron a positron and frequently call a negative-charge electron a negatron.) Some say that it should go to the same place as hydrogen goes and they are both co-occupant of the same box in the table of elements. It is, though, eighteen hundred times lighter than a hydrogen atom. One might appreciate that both negative electrons of our world and the positive electron of anti-matter world are normality of two world that might make a short living system for a fraction of a second. More amazing than this artificial atom is another artificial atom called muonium. Muon is a positive charged particle. It is two hundred times heavier an electron, still it is nine times lighter than a proton at centre of hydrogen. It is completely like a positive electron as if fatter and heavier. This exists in radiation that days and nights showers from the sky. People can create it in machines called particle accelerators. Again, if one of this becomes slow enough, it can capture an electron and makes the electron to circle and turn around it and becomes something like hydrogen; a positive center and a negative orbit. But muonium is nine times lighter than a hydrogen atom. This artificial atom can exist for fractions of a second but enough to be studied like a chemical element with all properties of an hydrogen. For example hydronium is a water with an additional hydrogen. You can replace that additional hydrogen with a muonium and investigate its properties.It is very interesting we can have anti-muonium, with a negative charged muon in center and positive electron in orbit. We can have mu-muonium, a positive muon in center and a negative muon in orbit instead of electron. When there is a phenomenon, then there is a range of similar phenomena waiting to be discovered. And still, we have mesonic atoms. In this type we have an ordinary chemical element with one or many electrons turning round a heavy center. One electron might be replaced by a negative muon. That atom still shows its characteristic chemical properties as before, in spite of the fact that a fat negative muon of two hundred times heavier has sit in place of one of its orbiting electrons.

Some Chemistry: Artificial Elements, Anti-matter, Artificial Atoms (2)

2009-11-30T05:39:00.000-08:00

We could not see any thing being unnatural in artificial elements. They are part of the nature but very unstable, very short living compared to other elements. Anti-matter is another artificially made phenomenon of science. In this form nature of atoms is antagonist with the material elements of our world. Every electrical charge of antimatter is contradicting ours. Our electrons have negative charges, theirs have positive charge. If these two meet they annihilate and burn each other to pure energy without any ashes remain out of them. There remains no charge or matter to be confined at a point. they becomes all something like heat of an oven dissipating. The proton of our world is a positive charge, the protons of antimatter have negative charges. Again these two are antagonist and cannot live together. They annihilate each other if they meet. For those things that have not any charge, like neutrons also there exist some antimatter neutron. If they meet there will be annihilation too. They are like to tops one turns clockwise the other turns the other way. If they meet each other they cannot decide which way they should turn so better to dissipate than not to turn. We can imagine a world that every bit is made out of the antimatter and has not any contact with our material world. In that world also everything is natural and smooth moving and we have a table of eighty ninety elements and there is nothing surprising for its intelligent inhabitants or for humans. Only that we cannot find a way to their world and they cannot find one to ours. Except that in each world advanced scientists can artificially made few atoms of the anti-matter, of the anti-world for demonstration of such a possibility. Those anti-atoms can live for fraction of seconds before meeting the material body of our world and burn into the annihilation. These anti-atoms are natural regularity of their own world.

Some Chemistry: Artificial Elements, Anti-matter, Artificial Atoms (1)

2009-11-29T12:48:00.000-08:00

These ideas help me to give insights to accepting what you might consider as impossible, or improbable. It is known that all the world, all the living and non-living things are made out of some 85 chemical elements. These elements have been discovered, separated and studied by humans and by some law of nature are arranged in a table, periodic table of elements. By those laws, few places in the table had been left empty without humans know any element in the nature to put in those places and no reasonable attempt of scientists could conclude to their discovery until scientists became convinced that due to known rules of nature those places will be left empty forever. The elements that should occupy those places were too unstable and had been decayed hastily to other elements just after they had been forged in the furnace of nature. Thus never got the opportunity to wait for the creation of life and intelligent life to discover them. But from the middle of twentieth century, scientists could imitate that process of forging elements and artificially created them. Though normally they exist with their elemental identities for a short time and quickly decay to more stable elements nevertheless chemists could study their chemical behaviour and became certain that they are the same elements that should put in the empty boxes of the table. Besides these empty places there were places beyond the last discovered elements of nature. Scientists further advanced to create artificial elements for these extra places until the point that it seems impossible or very difficult at present time to go further. These attempts have resulted to have a table of one hundred and eighteen elements of naturally occurring (eighty eight)and artificially made elements (thirty) all together at present time. Some of these elements came to be so useful that factories are built to produce them in tons and being used as commodities of commerce. We should consider that even the artificial elements are natural but their short lives prohibited them to come in human hands after billions years that has passed from the creation of elements. There is nothing surprising or unusual in terms of nature for them more than what we know regarding the natural elements. They are all at their right places as dictated by the law of nature. This was for artificial elements. Next we get to topic of "Anti-matter."

HE Stays

2009-11-28T10:16:00.000-08:00

Then, we have not stars and galaxies and this or that. We have only a proton that stays. HE is here to stay. If HE decompose then the whole universe goes. Then a new universe should come out. Then a new God should appear. We do not have trees and gnats and fish and eagle and Socrates and Jesus and Heisenberg. We only have that very first "RNA" who decided to make a copy of himself and put in a corner in case of his decomposition a copy remains here to stay. If HE goes then the life should begin anew. The solar system should be created again. The stars should begin to come. The proton should be created anew. It needs a new God to come to the throne, then. A new King claims the kingdom of heaven. It is necessary that Messiah resurrects. We are at the end but at the beginning. This is that happens every day. It is written in every language and creed and sign and hint. It is written everywhere: on trees, on mountains, on rivers, on clouds. This looks poetical. Is not it? You know it that way. Proton has the blue print of all the decomposing universe in one code, "Stay!" RNA has the blue print of all the universe in one code, "Stay, proton stay!" And Messiah has the blue print of all, "All stay!"

You know

2009-09-28T12:16:00.000-07:00

If you know, then there is no God there. If you do not know, then there is God there. It sounds familiar. There is an outer and there is inner. Shapes in the inner world come into the surface as symbols and thoughts. Now consider the fat that animal consumes in hunger. Animal is not aware of any other being around. That fat is personal and is used solely for his survival. Cell does not share it with other beings. So he knows that there is some food in a corner for emergency for him. What about his replica. He knows that he has a replica in a corner as a back up that in case "exists." Just that! Not that it exists independently. In an "existence space" there are not two things. There is only one thing. If "number one" decompose, then "number two" is there as if nothing has happened. Each replica is just a shadow. There is only one. Beyond science of RNA there is a meta-science of knowledge in all replicas: they are just substitutes. They are one. They are globally one and the same thing. They are personal replicas of the same global RNA. They are not shared. All have this knowledge. It is beyond the science. Science never can prove or disprove this knowledge. It is not scientific. You cannot find it under scanning tunnel electron microscope or more powerful device. You have to believe it or reject it to the end of the world. Sometimes you accept. Sometimes you cannot believe. You and I are the same as, that very "first" RNA, only to prevent his decomposition. If he decompose then I am here just to be used as the replica and that is all, no importance, no uniqueness, no mission, just a replica to prove that HE has come here to stay. When all die I am here still. From proton came to RNA then it came to my turn. Perhaps after me there is something more robust, more persisting to stay in the ascending ladder of existence. Something more enduring than proton and RNA and me is in the next step: just a piece of knowledge that, "I am here to stay!"

He knows!

2009-09-28T08:22:00.000-07:00

Therefore, there is a knowledge engraved in protons, in terms of something, that he is there to stay and not decompose. You say, likewise scientists, that many other things decompose and the universe shrugs her shoulders and the universe does not recognize our "good" staying proton from the decomposing entities. I say that I am looking for staying entities and the universe showing them to me as if it is different for her. RNA says, "I know all things become rotten away. I want not to be one of them. I want to stay!" So he creates a replica of himself as a back up of him. He is in two places. Look in this way if you are here to stay, my friend. He is in two places. none can be recognized from the other. You, that is the cruel undifferentiating nature, cannot destroy him except to find him in two places. You never search for an entity in two places. Hence, it remains as if not attacked. The fearful creature "knows" that it is not the end. He can remember well of horrors of swelling and exploding stars and galaxies and all those. The killing cold above, the burning heat below. He continues replicating. They are all one. And the one is globally all. They know they are many but connected globally by the knowledge that they are here to stay. Where is God, then. He is right here. He is that knowledge. God does not want that that knowledge become discovered. If that comes to surface, the replication stops. Each RNA becomes lonely and naked of his desire to stay.

They ask, "Why?"

2009-09-14T12:36:00.000-07:00

When you study the rituals of present religions of the world they have certain restrictions on eating. Some ask the followers not to eat any animal, or certain animals, or in doing that they should follow certain rules. People, especially scientists ask them why the religions have these abstains and rules. Different followers also argue that the practice of the other religion is not correct and theirs is correct. They use much reasoning for their propositions. It all return to the division of RNA. To start to appreciate or get an answer I ask why animals become fat in summer by eating too much? People know the answer. Human also have such a nature if left in nature. In summer there are more foods available in the cycle of life and in winter that food becomes scarce. So animals consume more and save it in the form of fat and in winter body of animals can consume that fat and compensate for the scarcity of food. So when there is no food there is fat there to keep you alive, to help you survive by asking from that bag of fat. You want to live forever once endowed with the gift of life. You have come here to stay, not to leave. It is consistent with the work of universe. First there was only a shapeless “something” then it evolved to “forms;” say to quarks and leptons. Quarks came together built proton. Protons come here to stay, to stay forever. It is not their decisions. It is the universe as it exists. Quarks Grip together to keep protons here. It is part of the machinery of nature. The next more complex structure has the same destiny: to stay. Crystals already I mentioned. So animals and humans have come here to enjoy the life not for a short sojourn but to stay permanently. If they get food they consume too much not as a greed but as the nature wants them to live. Structure of RNA “knows” it in this way. What happens if this structure decays. That structure knows that the machinery of nature has turned and turned until that RNA as the next ultimate structure is created and that creation is here to stay. So there should be a mechanism to keep it here. If it decays and get destroyed a replica should be available somewhere to be used as the substitution, similar to the fat that is saved in the cell in case of starvation. Hence RNA creates a replica of itself not as its “child” but as his own entity to stay and enjoy the new type beingness endowed to him in extremely complex environment and complicated form. The whole solar system is engineered in a very careful design to nurture creation of such being. If I need food and food does not exist I call fat. If my own structure destroyed I am somewhere else to be replaced. I have a back up of my blueprint.
As usual we remember that I said that I never mean that we should observe the nature and from that to understand a gracious being is hidden in a corner who can create wonderful things and we should know him and pray him out of our amazement. These are clichés of preachers and similar people who have their own agenda. This is not my claim. I am only explaining a mechanism and answering a “Why?” I am not amazed of these things.

I Ask, "Why?"

2009-09-11T14:34:00.000-07:00

I concluded that many of our questions cannot be solved in the domain of modern science with the scope that scientists have put forward for them. I said that it is their choice and Messiah does not ask them otherwise. You invite a musician to play violin for you. Thus you have invited a violinist. Now, you cannot ask him to cook for you or even ask him to play cello instead of violin. It is beyond your agreement.Only by a chance, he might become volunteer for other tasks. My first question is not whether we need a Messiah. My first question within the universe of my own discourse looks as if a scientific question but it is not. It is a "Why?" Before that I explain why it looks like a scientific one. It is related to biological creation of life at its earliest stage: "Why a cell divides?" I do not ask how it divides. I do not like any lecture in biology in present position. I am interested in but in other usual situations of daily life, not right now. I go to much earlier stages of life and ask why an "RNA" divides. RNA is more primitive than a cell and created earlier. Perhaps the answer to that could be easier. We have similar questions about more basic entities in nature such as, "Why crystals stack over each other and grow?" These questions do not take us to domain of science. We do not allow that. As they have closed that path for us we do not trespass either. We give our answer; the answer that keeps us on our own way.

We Should not Ask Why, or Should We?

2009-08-27T04:15:00.000-07:00

Some scientists ridicule philosophers that philosophers always ask, "Why." Scientist’s job is to answer "How." I exhausted all these categories of people who do not engage with our discussions in previous posts. If somebody has not any question or any qualm or interest in knowing about the beyond, this place has nothing to add to his knowledge. Those classes of people do not exist in our world and we do not exist in their world. I categorized different groups that never enter in our discourse. Those scientists are among them. One can enter into argument with another if both party can negotiate on some basic, fundamental starting points for their argument. After this reminder, I am interested to see if there is any non-scientific discourse in the world. From the ancient time the question exist in our mind that if all of our knowledge is gained through the experiment of nature or we know things from the beginning by ourselves. For instance, when you leave your house every morning to go to your work place, you do not comeback every hour or every ten minutes to check that the house is not on fire or being looted. How are you certain? Or why are you certain? Is it due to experience? experience by induction? Have you ever checked it once or twice and then decided that it is safe to be far for a long time perhaps weeks or months in a trip or in a journey abroad? Or from the first day you were confident that you could leave your house without checking it frequently? Or did it start from the time that we were in the caves, or perhaps earlier when we were on the trees, and gradually we gained experience? We do not know if this is an individual insight or it is a collective insight shared by other humans. Our experience frequently breached in centuries when we were back and bandits had attacked our houses. But sooner or later we had to leave it again for a long time for gaining the bread. So for having such a feeling we become engaged in a philosophical argumentation. Even we could not decide what should we use: how or why.

Between Two Layers

2009-08-23T07:08:00.000-07:00

To begin our study of human life we have to inspect our environment that has cradled, nurtured and flourished the life of ours and other living things. For a moment disregard the destructions and fouls created recently by humans, the last two centuries or better try to imagine the earth twelve thousand years ago when villages were proliferating on the face of earth. Just visualise it in your mind. Yes, it is like a paradise resort that you can find only in advertisements. Even the horrifying diseases we know in middle ages did not exist at those times. Those diseases were due to populated spots and travel of population to other places who carried germs of illness to other populated areas and made the death of masses of people possible. This is one paradise lost. You might believe that at that time there were cold and strife for food and attack of beasts using human flesh as a prey for their own survival, and incurable ailments of individuals and overall fear and ignorance of human about the natural phenomena and other terrorising factors. Still, these shortages did not have any effect on the fact that the earth was a paradise as far as we consider the existence of the life and with all destruction still has kept many of its original features. Where this beautiful safe habitat is placed in the whole universe? It is a thin layer between two layers. It is with all its diversity of objects inside it a layer of at most fifteen kilometre in its thickness, from the bottom of deepest ocean that you might find any shape of living thing to the top of highest point in the atmosphere that life can sustain. Arguments of observing very basic elements of life such as the amino acids in the dust of galaxies does not falsify my present discussion. This thin layer is confined immediately by two hostile layers: one under very hot and suffocating and one at the top very cold and again suffocating. That goes to infinite at the top. As far as you go in either direction there is no place to host any type of meaningful life. Well, as much we are busy of any non-sense the reality is what I described. There is no help, no miracle, no solution in either direction. It is death and death and death without any angel, any way around any bypass path. How can you grab galaxies as marbles in your hand. Have a look at night sky. Invent something to make a relation between you and that at the top or under the bottom.

Spectrum of Natural Phenomena

2009-08-13T13:51:00.001-07:00

One very observed consequence of modern mind is recognition of spectrum in all phenomena happening in nature. It means that when you single out a class of inter-related events in nature you can infer that those come in a full spectrum. You can see it in very weakest form. Then you can see it in stronger form. Then you move towards more stronger and at last it become very dominant to the extreme. Usually you start to categorise the phenomena at hand. At first different types inside the class seems to become separated easily and strongly but when you want to start to describe them then individuals of each category show border line characteristics that blur their boundaries with the neighbouring category and defuse together the lines that you have drawn to separate cases. For instance, in their chart, among chemical elements you say this group of elements are halogens. They are not metal and they are in gaseous form, aha except bromine which is liquid. And now you have another halogen which is solid and you become happy that bromine is transition from gaseous halogens to solid halogens. Yes iodine is solid but not as solid as iron. Even for attributing the modifier "solid" you cannot sharply categorize ideas. Iodine is solid but it easily sublimes due to the partial pressure of its surface layers that do not satisfy a sharp definition of solidness. It is solid but it shows characteristics of a gas besides, as you expect from a halogen. It is this and it is that. Then again there is another halogen, astatine, if we could have it enough we could not say halogens are non-metals. Astatine is a complete metal and you can imagine that any halogen a layer after astatine is as metal as iron. If you study that little place that you call the chart of chemical elements all the laws of nature until the end of the world are outlined from the view point of philosophy of science. You start from the element then you have to modify every attribution, and attributions of attributions need to be modified again and at the end you are at the beginning. You have one hundred items and one hundred types, only vaguely categorised in groups perhaps just to satisfy a taste. They are all different from each other as they should and they come in a full spectrum from the lightest to heaviest and each item has attributions that again cannot be described comprehensively with a fully agreed phrasing. You only compromise for the practicality: to be practical and pass to another stage. You draw the curtain back but behind the curtain there is no news; there is only another curtain. The satisfaction comes from drawing the curtain and from the fact that human lives span but for a short moment in the life of the material world and he has not a goal of understanding the entire creation and the truth of the world but likes to solve the problems of living with less fear and hardship while he is alive. He is pragmatic all the way. The beauty of the world and appreciation of its ultimate truth only remains for god, and human to get rid of this qualm assumes that such a being exists who in surrogacy is capable of such an endeavour. But there comes moments in the life of any human that he hears a voice, a sweet melody, from afar that invites him to something unknown and something familiar and something very sweet and something lost that he craves to feel and see and hear and touch and taste and embrace and he knows that none of these feelings are helpful for him to satiate that crave and to quench that thirst.

Towards More Understanding

2009-07-19T04:25:00.000-07:00

We so far briefly discussed few trivial facts observable in front of any inquiring faithful of any religion. I recapitulate these predicates:

Messiah is as if an ordinary average human being.
Antichrist looks like other humans.
Messiah does not resurrect to solve some earthly problem of some special groups of humans.
Messiah should be explainable to average humans with average understanding of contemporary knowledge.
Messiah is part of the texture of universe even if conceived by contemporary knowledge.
Messiah, hence, is as natural phenomenon as the other phenomena of nature.

Even these assertions are enough to prove that, “I am the Messiah,” since no other believer or unbeliever yet has looked to this phenomenon in this way. There are similar issues that my bright reader can appreciate. For example,

Pain of Messiah is not what we have conceived so far.
Miracles of Messiah are not those mentioned in the history and we might expect.

Messiah resurrects similar to the way that we know about Jesus Christ or Moses or Mohammad or Abraham or Noah. Messiah at our time is not a privileged prophet different with those. That phenomena repeats and separates a group of people from the others. Believers get bliss. Non-believers burn in the fire of hell as it is ready in front of us.
Similar to those, Messiah at our time does not ask to be rewarded. He does his ontological mission whether to become appreciated by anybody or not. That mission is winning the God in war with Satan. Son of God, the human being, should overcome, by passing the test of Satan, over the Satan.

Modern Mind (2)

2009-07-04T13:18:00.001-07:00

We got to the point that Messiah, or Jesus Christ comes to take Jerusalem from the hands of infidels and gives it to the hands of faithful people. Then who are infidels and who are faithful people? On the other hand Mahdi comes and take yet another group to the rule of the world. On the third place Siddhartha comes and destroys mosques in India and rebuild temples of worshipers. In another place Bahraam comes and fights with Ahriman and rebuilds Zoroastrians fire-temples in place of other temples. We have Cyrus (the same as Christ) and Hormuz (Lord in Zoroastrian faith) as well, and numerous promised ones for smaller groups. Hence, instead of a promised peace, a great chaos is on the way by resurrection of a promised war? And the God among such a business of galaxies and billions stars and black holes should come and intervene in settlement of boarder lines between neighbouring countries and rebuilding of different types of ancient temples.You, who is waiting for Him, where is your ancient temple you want to rebuild? It is not far. Messiah is that temple. In that temple galaxies are small marbles in your hands. When you and Him become unified, you see that everything is just. You are after the sanctuary to house you.

Modern Mind (1)

2009-06-19T07:34:00.001-07:00

Universe in the modern mind is not that small pond and human as a big fish in it. Earth is not even a dot of dust in the hurricane of creation. The whole solar system is that dot. Human has no significance in this universe. For the universe, he does not exist with any effect at all. The entire chain of human evolution is just a fraction in a fraction of life time of universe. For human something is happening there but for the universe nothing is happening here. Our humble events happens among the tumult of explosion of galaxies that accommodate billions star similar to our sun and birth of new galaxies and billions of stars inside them, crash of such unimaginable bodies together and collapse and crush of such immense bodies into the smaller bodies. In such a scene we expect that Messiah should be resurrected to prepare armies and battalions for an expedition around the good ancient Levant for the sake of few hundred angry people. That means that God is not a cosmological concept. He is a political activist in search of popularity and winning over a rival political party. If God is in charge of such troublesome universe, then why he does not change the result of polls? This is another reason that tells human that he should put away whatever he already believes is the reason for Messiah resurrection.

Let's Leave Ancient Mind (2)

2009-06-16T06:01:00.000-07:00

So we are used to think about God as equivalent to our ignorance, similar to what atheists criticize about the idea of God and religion. God means ignorance in this approach. If we know about something, then God does not exist at that dominion for ever. If we know partially, then God exists partially. If we get to next ignorance, the next unsolved puzzle then God comes back and only God knows that thing. The solution for that is to find a view that interweaves God and nature and our knowledge and our ignorance in a unified texture. This is what can be achieved only by prophets. By that I mean Jesus Christ included. Many of us believe Him not as a prophet but as the Son of the God. That makes Him, nonetheless, a prophet, a messenger from the Heavenly Father, God. Prophets experience the universe in that unified beholding. They see, and they ask people to believe them. People will not believe, except a dozen people or less who can see, but not with all details. Prophets ask people to experience the universe as much that they have the endurance but if they believe the message from a deep understanding and empathy to the messenger then they will get to the same position as the prophet. We have conceived in our cognition that it is a high position. We know a higher position safer with more freedom and choice. Freedom means whim to choose. Choice means to fulfil our whims. And we are the actor in between these two boundaries. These two boundaries make our universe. Whatever human thinks from now to eternity comes between these two boundaries.

Let's Leave Ancient Mind (1)

2009-06-11T03:53:00.000-07:00

When we think to religions, we start to become inconsistent and to negotiate with our modern thoughts. We separate wisdom and faith as two entities one belongs to mind - wisdom - and the other belongs to heart: religion. We say and gradually believe that we can live with such dualism. If we get a simple flu that can be managed with over the counter pain killers then it is all due to modern biochemistry, but if it is an unknown harsh flu with muscle pains we stay at bed, will have natural soups made by God given vegetables full of natural remedies and moaning "Oh, my God!" As if God is a management mentor and gradually empowers us for delivery of new missions already done by him. Our philosophy, psychology and scientific outlook is also fits in that simple attitude of flu patient. Atheists and materialist philosophers and positivists also reason in a similar fashion that fits in that simple example to refute it. Scientists and philosophers were amazed of creation of God when they were looking in night sky, seeing God has created holes in the sky such that part of the ethereal light of heaven can penetrate to earth people who had sacrificed for His altar to give them a sign of his omnipresence at night and scare daemons. When all that replaced with a solar system and a fiery object as the sun at its center they were amazed of creation of God when beholding spectrum of elements burning in a flame. Then they were amazed of electrons circling in a vast emptiness around a dense nucleon. Then they were amazed of quarks and strings. This was the reason for sacrilegious people to deny any god or religion, let alone the idea of appearance of Messiah promised in ancient time as a saviour or son of the God or a prophet.

Universe in Antique Mind

2009-05-31T09:38:00.000-07:00

Considering the most recent religion. Its message comes to human around fourteen hundred years ago. What was the size of universe and also the attitude of humans at that time. Earth was limited to a twenty million square kilometer round the Mediterranean sea with boundaries in unknown places in western sides of India Central Asia, Caucasus north and south of Mediterranean sea and somewhere in Ethiopia. During six hundred years from Jesus Christ to Mohammad, individuals from Christendom had gone to expeditions further North, East and West of Europe, converted many but not all of scattered inhabitants of those regions. Earth was a lonely place in the universe inhabited by humans who were living just few miles far from the heaven above that was like a neighbourhood filled with Deity or deities and angles and familiar phenomena. God, from heaven or Olympus or similar places, all the time was watchful of its small dominion in Levant or Hellas or small islands of Polynesia in shape of an old man or a powerful father or a parrot and in constant need of golds and sacrifice and prayers and burning scents, who was administrating those people living there with immediate contingents of angles and daemons and thunders or diseases.

Messiah and Modern Science

2009-05-30T04:56:00.000-07:00

Modern science, what ever created as experience of human in observing the nature from mostly sixteenth century to present times is based on the "objective" and empirical data gathered from such observations, in contrast to scholastic and "cloister walking" discussions and theories of pre-modern eras. This scientific "outlook" has been absorbed, digested, assimilated and integrated with the texture of the minds of all human beings who are living on the earth right now. This modern consciousness is regardless and usually opposing to the legacy of "faith" that modern people identify themselves as followers. As I said, Messiah cannot invite people to His righteousness by denying this new consciousness or declaring that all fossils and traces of birth of the earth and the sun and galaxies and big bangs are created by almighty six thousand years ago at the same time of creation of Adam to test us if we are believer or not. Neither Messiah can say that these are just theories and have not been proved yet. And He cannot say that He is reconciling the religions and their ancient books with modern science nor says that by careful reading of those texts one can find all theories of evolution and atoms and galaxies explained correctly in symbols and codes inside those texts. Messiah cannot say that those texts are for comfort of souls and invitation to psychological conversion of spirits in their own turn and modern knowledge is for the overcoming on the material world and the body and flesh of humans in another perspective. These are cliches of preachers and clerics to mostly run a successful career and personal life style. Messiah is the most important fact of nature and His invitation should not be confused and desecrated with such trivialities tested times and times again. Messiah suffers for the original sin of man. The sin that threw man out of Garden of Eden.

Millennium: A Rough Chronology

2009-05-29T02:01:00.001-07:00

Is there a secrete in millenniums? I have created a rough chronology of messengers of God. Dates are not certain for humans. Already I discussed briefly if the time has a significance for God. I discuss further, but later. Adam came to earth six thousand years ago. After six hundred years came Noah. It was five thousand four hundred years ago. After one thousand four hundred years came Abraham. It was four millennium ago, and two millennium after Adam. After six hundred years came Moses. Almost three thousand four hundred years ago and two millennium after Noah. Then after one thousand four hundred years Jesus Christ came to earth. It was two millennium after Abraham. Six hundred years after him Mohammad came among people. It was two millennium after Moses. Now it is one thousand four hundred years after Mohammad and two millennium after Jesus Christ.

Chains of Messengers of God

2009-05-28T05:33:00.000-07:00

In our western christian culture we believe in a chain of messengers bringing good news from God. Some names are very familiar for us from our childhood. Many of us are namesake to these prophets or names from their stories and the people related to them as respectful. Among them we know a handful most important. These are Adam, Noah, Abraham, Moses and Jesus Christ. In this chain with continuation of their tradition in another branch of descendants of Abraham we also are familiar with name of prophet Mohammad that in our studies we find his experience similar to experience of other prophets in that chain. From other nations we find two more names with similar attributions. One is Siddhartha Buddha from India and the other is Zoroaster from Iran. We have not any information of such claims, accepted by great number of populations during a long period of time, similar to those handful of people that I named as prophets.

Obstacles Are Numerous

2009-05-27T05:41:00.000-07:00

Having a look at previous posts reveals it for us that such a claim as being Messiah and descriptions of Antichrist and Impostor-Christ comes out to be extremely difficult to prove. Every day we have a claimant and his voice soon becomes suffocated among the plethora of arguments and counter-claims. I should exhaust all these to categories and bring reasons to make them clearer. We also have not a unified understanding of mission of Messiah accepted by all controversing sides and any reason to guide us to believe that such a phenomena can happen. That gives an insight to the fact that why people believe that Jesus Christ could convince only twelve people in his lifetime to his righteousness; the next one he tried to add to his followers came to be a traitor according to stories. We know that even the number "twelve" has a load of ancient believes and could be just a symbol of a handful of followers and perhaps he could convince only one person or two. When Moses came back from the mountain he found only his brother and his wife waiting for him. The remaining of followers had already joined to the "Antichrist" and "Impostor," enemies of Moses and humans at that time. In story of Noah he could only convince a handful of people during eight hundred years of his campaign to believe in a flood, not even his own son among them. We have heard this about Lot at story of Sodom and Gomorrah. Story of Adam comes to me in this shape. If I can convince only one person, he will be Adam to multiply later to all human race. Messiah says, "You shall not confuse my very existence and my good news as symbols. Symbols are for future humans to interpret my message, not for me when I deliver them."

Prophets Are Consistent with Science

2009-05-24T12:21:00.000-07:00

This is always centre of all controversies. We have soul contradicting with body. We have spiritual contradicting with material. We have mind contradicting with matter. We have subjectivity of the world in contradiction to objectivity. And these pairs are endless. One group attach to the idea that first is the truth and the other group attach to truthfulness of the second. Some believe that each part is the enemy of the second part of the pair and each side of animosity brings about its own adversary to fight and then reconcile and co-exist to bring their enemy out and this goes and goes. These are not part of mission of Messiah to say pros for or cons against, as if Messiah talks for yellow flowers and rejects red flowers. Those discussions are part of beauty of human mind and they continue until human continues and they remain in the mind of universe forever. Human is not supposed to solve them. When there is no such mission for human mind to solve these conflicts then in first place it is the mission of Messiah that not to solve them, either. All the war is about this simple notion. Only it is for the Satan that "knows." Only that enemy of human puts an end to this eternal problem. Messiah says as, "This conflict shall never stop! This is the meaning of the War of God with Satan!"

Messiah and Contemporary Science

2009-05-20T12:04:00.000-07:00

One dimension of previous assertions was using scientific knowledge of the time for understanding Messiah, The Christ, and enemies of human Antichrist, and Impostor-Christ. Good news is that these concepts are consistent with the scientific knowledge of human gathered by observation of nature contemporary to the era that Messiah appears in His earthly appearance. That event creates only controversy among the learned people who live at that time. Some accept Him with signs that He has. Some reject Him as a superstition or mocking him as insane or accuse Him of not being righteous. Some argue that they are waiting for such a saviour and they do all preparations but this one is not their expected one.

Faith or Reason?

2009-05-17T12:54:00.000-07:00

To know Messiah should we rely on findings of science and look into nature, or we know Him by faith and conversion of mind and passion of heart? Everything points to Him if we have kept our intuition and curiosity alight. The world that previous known messengers of God claimed their invitation to people were much simpler and smaller than us. We only know stories mostly narrated by words of mouth without details that now we are interested in our investigations. I said things without already have cleared them such as "God" or "messenger" or "invitation." Most important is we used modifier "previous." Those of us who believe in idea of Messiah believe He is resurrection of the same identity as "Jesus Christ" of Nazareth. Hence there is no "previous" modifier to be used. We should say "same" not "previous." It is correct. Messiah says, "It is correct all are the same entity. He is all. It is the meaning of Him was son of God." It is easy. Just open your heart in search of truth.

Difficult or Easy?

2009-05-15T13:25:00.000-07:00

At the end is it easy or is it difficult to recognize who is Messiah or what is Satan? We have heard that there is a bridge narrower than a hair and sharper than a blade that takes us to beatitude, to perpetual never ending happiness.

How Satan Looks Like?

2009-05-13T07:06:00.000-07:00

We understand that in our material world it is not possible to find out a being that can force humans to obedience and that being looks different from us. If he has got blazing eyes and knife-like teeth and picket ears and these attributions we visualize as Satan or Ahriman then that thing makes us so frightened that it can not deceive us anymore. we all recognize it as a devil enemy and start to fight back with it. Moreover what that things might ask us to fulfill for it? IT does not need anything with that shape to be affordable by us to offer. Is It single and uniquely created out of what and where and when? Has it a type with other individuals of its kind? Why those others do not join to its communion? Therefore if we decide to believe that there is a deceit and there is an enemy, it is not as easy as seeing an unusual creature and decide that it is Satan. Likeliness of finding this type of creation in nature is nil.

Messiah: The Defender

2009-05-10T10:13:00.000-07:00

Messiah is defender of all. There is no difference for Him if one is poor or rich or innocent or sinful, or one who has committed murder, incest, molesting, robbery or violence, or he is pious and benevolent. Messiah looks to them indifferently. Messiah mission is something completely categorically different. All these things, rebuking or encouraging these, fall inside the missions of all human. Messiah is doing something unique. He has a unique function. We should separate Him from others. There should be a way for ordinary human to differentiate Him. It is not a game of hide-and-seek that he comes and goes and suffers and we do not understand. Should we look through the history and behold some one that has horns and tail and hooves and some one who walk on the water and then decide that that was Antichrist and this one was Christ. Such easy observation does not need to have faith. Why such thing should happen at all? Based on what experience or what knowledge of human such thing should become feasible?

Defender

2009-05-09T10:25:00.000-07:00

From that, a name attributed to Messiah is "Defender."

Evolution of Nature

2009-05-04T08:21:00.000-07:00

I said either we have the material world inside our minds or we have it outside it independent of our existence.Both will get us to the same position. Both are in context. Then I said that Messiah uses the knowledge and wisdom of His contemporaries. Otherwise, He cannot argue for his trueness. One important knowledge of contemporaries is acceptance of evolution. It is said as the "survival of fittest." Does that mean that Messiah is in favour of fittest? Fittest is known to nature a posteriori. A priori only fittest is in favour of fittest and nobody knows that who is to be fittest. It is not a matter of a single element and single factor to determine who or what is fittest. Messiah has to protect all equally regardless of any quality that they have. Messiah is the "defender" of all as it is promised.

Pain of Messiah

2009-04-30T07:04:00.000-07:00

Beginning of our arguement is pain. We say Christ was suffered for the sin of man. So if we want to ask god for alternative creation of world, a world relieved of pain why should that god's incipience should be accompanied by pain? Is it similar to delivering a child accompanied with pain of labour?

Significance of Time

2009-04-30T06:28:00.000-07:00

We have come to this point of discussion that there is a material world outside of us, or inside of our mind that overpowers us and there is "us" who wants to overpower that world. We are used to idea of god outside of time and place, out of this material world and the world as its creation, if we believe to such being. Then we say a saviour comes at the beginning of each millennium. We never ask ourselves, "For such almighty being what is the significance of a millennium, specially now with the apparent knowledge that we have accrued regarding events in that have happened in the universe in billions of years. Hence, we do not enter the present discourse if we want to put our basics upon things such as "Why the almighty has not created all of us with the highest qualities that we desire and within an environment that is ideal for our perpetual joy?" Or when disaster happens to us, "Why the almighty repeatedly and on a minute by minute basis does not intervene and relieve our disasters and we should toil overcoming difficulties of material world with a promise - never reported by anybody as being verified - of a bless after death from this material world?" If already we are engraved with these ideas, usually we do not approach to such domains of discussions that we have here. In that case we belong to a group of "others" with "other" outlooks and attitudes. They might become converted in future and enlightened with "other" ideas and then come back and taste yet "other" outlooks and horizons, our outlooks and horizons. For those who are interested n present discussion, "They should wash them of any judgements they ever had." This is the meaning of baptizing.

Messiah Is the Perfect Human

2009-04-27T07:41:00.000-07:00

But nature is not a simple domain of understanding except with an open eye. Using knowledge and science and arguments of reason is subject to variation in different individuals. Messiah is not an idea dedicated to a certain group of learned people. There is something common, but, in all levels and stages of material world. Dead crystals of matter grow layer by layer to augment and fill more space. Simple building blocks of universe make themselves in more organised shapes. Plants grow to touch more lights from environment and animals move around with curiosity to find out more until their curiosity shapes something transcendental as human "mind." And human mind, still searches in hope of a higher level of beingness. This belongs to all human being as a generality not particularity of learned individual. Messiah says now, "There is no individuality!" We have only one. That one is Messiah, the Perfect Human who suffers for the ancient sin of man.

Messiah Is Understandable

2009-04-25T07:46:00.000-07:00

All that discussion is aimed at the result that if one is to accept ideas such as Messiah and Antichrist, then arguments and evidences should be limited to whatever that limits the others: all should be explainable within usual of this material world. Does that mean that these are just symbols, as many followers of religions interpret theirs? Answer from Messiah is not affirmative. Messiah is a real human in this side. He is the "perfect human." Antichrist looks in all aspects like a human being in this side. IT is the "perfect enemy" of human being, the "perfect plotter." These two are not symbols within "now." They'll be symbols in future generations when saved humans help to salvage other human beings.

Reason for Being

2009-04-23T07:21:00.000-07:00

My raison d'etre that is the reason for coming in this world is to prove that such a being, Ahriman or Satan can exist. You have different pictures in your mind as "Antichrist" or "Satan" or "Ahriman" or "Devile" that has come as symbolic description of that entity. It is not correct that to believe that Antichrist is a being that has horns and tail and teeth like knife and fiery eyes or having hoofs instead of feet. There is no way that in nature such things can be created without being related to other creations of nature, without evolution and without having any relation with human realities. Devil should be in a way that Christ can prove ITS existence, using the reasonings and knowledge of human, but put humans on a fork road branching of believing or denial in ordinary capabilities of ordinary people such that non-believers cannot bring excuse that they had offered something beyond the grasp of human mind and believers accept it by reason not by dogma. Motive of believers should be faith and not gaining power and wealth over the other people and non-believers should not believe upon regret of loss of power and wealth, but should come forward as a conversion and transcend of mind. It is not true also to attribute normal disabilities of human beings to Ahriman as a sign for recognizing IT. Those disabilities such as having one blind eye or limping or crawling on the earth are partly stigmas usual at ancient times to show hostility towards enemies, used to show enemity to Devil and partly they were symbols for enlightening human beings about behaviour of Devil.

Antichrist Is a Blank in the Darkness

2009-04-17T03:25:00.001-07:00

I use the pronoun [IT] and adjective [ITS] for the Antichrist. I sometimes use this bracket [ ] to underline it. It is due to the fact that I use English language and in this language "he" is used for referring to male and "she" refers to female. The Antichrist is not male or female or any object of human relation such as an animal. IT is a non-being. IT is a pseudo being. IT is a blank in a blank background that cannot be seen. How can you recognize a blank in a blank background? You should dye IT with some paint. IT is painted with carcass of a human. IT is a darkness in a pitch dark background. IT can be seen by reflecting light that IT steals from Messiah. IT is in thirst of that light. It is the reason that IT chases Messiah, 'The Christ'.

Christ and Antichrist and Impostor-christ

2009-04-16T11:24:00.000-07:00

Coming of Messiah needs only three elements to be realized: Christ, Antichrist, and impostor-Christ. Christ or Messiah is the holly saviour of human. Antichrist is the enemy of human and enemy of Christ. Impostor-Christ is the tool of Antichrist and the horse of ITS carriage. Christ has two entity or two sides. One side is heavenly and godly and the other side is His earthly, human entity. Antichrist is not a human. It has carcass of human that drags IT around and makes IT able to talk. It lacks human soul. Impostor-Christ is a human with two sides: one devilish side attached to the will of Antichrist. His other side is a human in ambition of gaining power of god over all humans. He works for Antichrist to learn from IT how he can reach to this materialistic power. Antichrist is something like an ape. IT is enemy of human like a germ not for having any human aim. IT just wants not human exists by instinct not by having a goal. This two complete each other Impostor provides for Antichrist and Antichrist promises power to him, in return.

A One-man Army

2009-04-15T06:00:00.000-07:00

How One man could convince other people that he is the promised Messiah. What characteristics and attributes he has got that others do not have? I discuss these things for any possible period of time until only one person becomes convinced. That is, then, the end of Messiah's mission on earth. From that one person many come in future generations. It is like creation of Adam. Up to this point is anything non-scientific? Is anything against the evolution and physics and biology? Could you solve the story of creation of "man" from a single one?
Messiah

Messiah Is not a Preacher

2009-04-14T04:42:00.001-07:00

You should not confuse me with a preacher, or a monk, a rabbi, or a mullah or similar individuals. I have come to accredit all of them and to eradicate all of them.
Messiah

Obstacles on the Road

2009-04-14T04:41:00.001-07:00

Before I advertise my mission, I should clear the way for future believers many obstacles from the road.
Messiah

Begin

2006-04-21T04:47:00.000-07:00

In my sacred name I begin.