Story of Prophets

If people become partitioned towards Antichrist then they'll become partitioned towards Messiah. Then it changes to a fair game of humans not something beyond affairs of daily life.  Part of suffering of Messiah and all the prophets is that they become left lonely and unbelieved and mocked at. They should not share their visions with groups of people, as they could not. We said that people should accept this phenomenon as a conversion of faith not by evidences and proofs but by hints and road maps. Perhaps you have heard or are familiar with the Socrates' notion of  dialectic. One should annihilate all attributes that make a phenomenon shared, and owns in common with other phenomena until at the end of annihilation one gets to that phenomenon that he is studying with all its pureness and carved out of its background, solid and existing and tangible in front of him, until he become sure that that phenomenon actually exists in its reality, all sparkling and shining and eye dazzling and all beingness. At the beginning you believe that you are killing that phenomenon by denying everything for him, but at the end it comes out more alive for you than anything else. If Messiah stays longer among us, he is describing prophets, Jesus, Muhammad, Moses, Abraham in a new way for modern human. For the faithfuls of those religions, at first it might come heavy to accept but then they appreciate that if those people have had something related to all the creation then believing them as philosophers, orators, physicians, shrewd merchant, converter of water to wine or to blood is actually degrading them to ordinary humans with similar interests. All of them were face to face to Antichrist, to that carrier of the most profane. It is not that Antichrist was only at the time of Jesus Christ. That entity is part of the mission of all messengers of god, including Buddha and Zoroaster.

Anti-Christ Is a Real Phenomenon in Nature (3)

Usually, I have read many ideas about "Ahriman" or Satan, other names for and the same entity as "Anti-Christ." They attribute such entity to a political character, sometimes to very cunning rich people, or to criminals. Such characters, if bad, or even worst of them are bad in the context of ordinary human experience. Their actions could be satanic but they are not Satan. Satan is a cosmological phenomenon. He, if we can use this pronoun for It, cannot commit itself to such engagements. That things is not here to become rich or famous or rule over the material world. It has a mission, as the enemy of humans, to eradicate the humanity. Not that to replace of something by bad things, but to substitute nothingness in place of beingness. He is enemy (of Messiah) by its nature and should concentrate all its activity towards fighting with Messiah. If It goes to politics, or acquiring wealth and power then people would become partitioned towards him as enemies or as friends. Then he would not be able to mobilize all the people but few, perhaps only one person left on the side of Messiah, as its mission is such a mobilisation. It is not the case that there is an Armageddon of usual armies to decide who wins who forfeit. Satan is extreme of slyness and treachery. When it becomes incarnated he can cheat "everybody" towards his chicanery. You have heard from teachings of religions that when God created man, all angels prostrated to submission to man but Satan, who said that it remains enemy to the man to the end. So Satan does not come to earth to buy and sell things or ask people to vote to him. He is friend with none. How such thing can happens in the material world. How can you find something who looks like a human and can communicate with humans (to urge them against Messiah) but do not engage in daily affairs of human. What power and specification it has that it can conduct such an Armageddon against the one man army of Messiah.

Anti-Christ is a real phenomenon in nature (2)

Still, there were arguments that mind is the same as brain. Rearrangements of molecules in their ultimate happens in the material brain. It is as you say proton is just concentration of energy. You say that, it is just three quarks attached to each other. That kind of reasoning means that you even do not believe that there is such thing as brain. RNA is just an aggregate of hydrogen carbon nitrogen and oxygen with few other elements. We might left in a hollow of "nihil." Then there is the "good news" that you cannot reason for "nihil." You hear the good news and you cannot ignore it because you have a mind that recognizes it without you can help it. And that holy creature, "mind" also reasons to keep you integrated in favour of a controversy, as, "there is only nihil." Hence, reasoning for "nihil" is equivalent to reasoning for mind. Good news is that you exist in-spite of your reasoning against it. You can keep your "cool status" while at the same time you are enjoying secretively as a member of "boring kids club" of those who are here to stay. Proton knows that it is a new entity. It is not concentration of energy. It is equivalent (please calculate it using physics of high school)to myriads units of energy of sunshine shining to myriads square kilo-meters of empty space but gathered in the smallest possible volume to create next stages of existence. Proton knows that it refuges other wandering entities (electrons) and decaying entities (neutrons), whom without him will not have any role in the nature, in a safe haven of a family which is the first stone of the foundation of higher stages of beingness in nature. He cannot ignore such a good news by reasoning that he is just another name for arrangement of three quarks.

Anti-Christ is a real phenomenon in nature

I already fully elaborated on the idea of a spectrum for natural phenomena. You observe something weak here then definitely you find its full-fledged happening somewhere else. You see this happens in a small scale then that can happen in a very large scale. I said, sometimes when you cannot find the whole spectrum in nature then human can create it artificially. Messiah and anti-Christ are also extreme of a phenomenon in nature that on a daily basis at any moment a human can experience in its mild and milder and mildest forms within himself and without  in the aggregate of humans in the society. To further preparation for the discourse man should refer to his "mind." Mind of a human is the most complex and end product of the nature. Well, I do not mean the "brain." Even the brain of very advanced primates is also somehow extreme of creation of nature. Sometimes, one might be deluded, when he is reading about black holes and quarks and gluon's and these things that what surprises they have and you might forget that the surprise is not in those basic, simple, very crude and primitive objects of nature. The surprise exists in the tool that observes, studies and analyses them; not the brain, the human mind. Before going further one could be too stiff in protesting that there is only brain and talking of mind means that I want to bridge the gap and jump into the world of metaphysics and leave the physics behind. I might do it but in future. For now, I am using only physics. We have two sets and one function from one to the other. One is nature and the other set is the set of results of action of physical brain on the nature. Brain is the function. Result or in mathematical term, "image" of this function is mind. You might say it is only arrangement and re-arrangement of molecules. Well, saying just that, is the mind, not the brain. Your mind says that clause, not your brain. Why is it physics. We should go back to the entities who are here to stay. First object we could find was the proton. It emerged from the creation as an entity that does not "want" to decay and annihilate except that you force it. Then we noticed crystals. They "want" to stack and fill the space in spite of the fact that to do that they have to swim upstreams against the tendency of the nature, surrounding them in whole, who pushes them back. "Then we had RNA who 'wants' to stay by creating a replica of himself. He believes if he needs himself when he is decaying then he is there by presence of the replica," said so Messiah when he was asked why we multiply. I called those surprising objects, black holes, quarks, gluons, basic since RNA already was in those stages and could not find those stages enough to stay at, and evolved and evolved, until he - RNA -  created the Paradise, the blue warm, wet, and friendly cradle for his own creation. Then he, I mean RNA, created water, methane, more complex chemicals. When everything was ready RNA was there. Then as he had aimed he started to put one back-up for him at each point on the earth. "I am everywhere and always here. Look, I am here. No, look at me I am here, no..here!" Then enemy could not decide which one is the original which one should be annihilated. Perhaps there is a mirror shattered in pieces and each is the beautiful face of Him, of the RNA? Enemy, the annihilator who presses the blue habitat from the above and from the below remained wandering in search of him forever. Shattered pieces of mirror carry the same and one thing. Each show the same face and when you put the jigsaw of the broken pieces together they show the same thing, an RNA who is here to stay. Those pieces are our minds and they are parts of our global mind jigsawed to make one. They are attached in unification but their projections  into our local time space seems separated and enemy is wandering forever which one to annihilate. The enemy is one who has not that picture. So he is in search of that picture. Leave this sweet fable for now. Wake up back to the physics such that in a dialectic of physics and "non-"physics you can start to believe that you are here to stay. You already know that how proton is so stable and how RNA created as a replicator. If you do not know and you are interested you can go to school and learn it. Here you learned "why." Therefore, we negotiated that there is our mind as the result of evolution. We add that we have evolved drastically from a time-space localisations of some primitive magma of energy into the protons and we passed crucibles after crucibles until RNA and then fights and survivals into the shape of a human. You know how we started to walk on our hind legs until we had to twist our face ninety degrees downwards to be able to see front of us instead watching the sky when walking on our legs. (That tendency remained in our eyes to look in the old direction into the sky.) See, in each stage, at each milestone with the big gap that exists between them a transformation happens. The universe of that entity changes. He leaves a universe behind him. Proton never decays, RNA lays many of him everywhere. It is natural that we extrapolate for another surprise, for another revolution in evolution. That surprise does not exist somewhere else that we start to create tools and labs to discover it. That, in its very natural expectation, is continuation of our existence. We are at the head of the arrow and we are going towards it, knowing or not knowing.

What is Anti-Christ? (3)

Before continuing, I must answer a question that might arise. Why am I speaking about Christ while the title is, "What is Anti-Christ?" It is because Anti-Christ is the shadow of darkness. It is a blank in a dark background that finds existence as a parasite to emergence of Christ in the material world. When I know what a Messiah is then the road is paved to acknowledge what Anti-Christ is.

***

People attribute miracles to Jesus or Moses or Mohammad. For instance, Jesus walked on water without submersion in the water. Assume some one comes to you, as a modern human, and tells you that he can walk on water and shows it to you. What happens to you, then? You know illusionists, do not you? People give them money and fame and comfort and applaud for what that people know only as a trick. Do you go and crucify illusionist. Do illusionists advertise any thing other than their jobs. Do they insist to the death that they are something else. What about in ancient time, the time of Jesus Christ? There were illusionists with their own tricks in those times, too. They also had status similar to modern ones in their societies. Sometimes they had claims of being something else. Their difference with Jesus Christ was that they were conforming to money, fame and applaud. Nobody can remember them later. If somebody without any illusion or trick genuinely can walk on the water an upheaval happens in the society. How people can remain indifferent, after that? Jesus Christ converted water to wine. He was from a tribe who were famous as good investors. How then they left him to be crucified in loneliness while he could convert cheap water to high quality wine? He did those miracles only once to show that he was genuinely the Son of the God; you might say. Well, he could arrange sessions for different groups of people, for people from the Temple, for Romans for different groups until news become accepted by everybody or by the most people that he was really the promised one. Then what was his mission? People would accept after those sessions that He was genuine. Now what should they do? What requirements should be fulfilled? What then? Should they go and do prayer day and night? Should they close the doors to themselves and dedicate themselves to God? Should they mobilise for a war. Do they need anything to do for bread for sustenance. Or Jesus Christ should provide for them similar to story of one bread for five thousands people. Muslims believe that Messiah (Mahdi) comes and opens the gold mines for them. It seems tests that humans put forward for being a Godly entity is more difficult to pass than tests that God puts forward for human salvation. For few dollars an hour people commit themselves to most dangerous jobs such as being a soldier in a war zone then what happens if some one comes and opens gold mines for them.Who might crucify such a benefactor? People rush and kiss the soil that he steps on.

What is Anti-Christ? (2)

Therefore, we excluded Messiah of being a political leader, a rebellion, a general. No other occupation or extraordinary talent you might attribute to Messiah. One never says that Messiah is a great athlete, or a great violinist. The great violinist becomes a great violinist. A great athlete becomes a great athlete. Spartacus, the gladiator who rebelled near the time of Jesus Christ and had many great personal characteristics and cruelly was crucified was a great athlete and suffered what you might believe similar to Jesus Christ, but he only is remembered where and when you might remember Jesus Christ good messages and not by his own.

***

People might say that Jesus Christ was a great orator or a great philosopher. Around the time of Jesus Christ there were living very great orators such as Cicero, speaking in the mother tongue of Romans, great philosophers like Plotinus with deep understanding of God as an abstract entity in creation of the world. Ideas advertised by Jesus, or old testament, or Mohammad looks humble comparing with them. Do you know how great are Plato, and Aristotle, even in our modern philosophy? They were recognised already by the learned people of the time as having a sound and sane social position why Jesus Christ should be preferred who was companion of vagabonds and centre of attention of illiterate people. Learned people of temple did not argue with Jesus. They knew him of no intellectual value to argue with him in a valid way. This much was attitude of his own people, let alone Romans who were ruling half of the world and constantly were in conflict with rebels and native ideas and cultures behind those rebels. Frequently, they had to send big armies and finest generals and warriors and great amounts of bribes for opposing chieftains and warlords to settle such conflicts. They just did not consider to talk with Jesus for a second. They sent a couple of illiterate villain soldiers to finish whatever was the cause of the buzz. With no ordinary reason  you ever know why each one of you hangs a cross of Jesus, or a star of David on his neck or one blows himself for the name of Mohammad, but name of Plotinus is hidden in few books in dusty libraries. Do you believe ideas of Marx with all greatness with all compassion that exists in them, with all mobilization that they have given to minds and hearts of modern man will endure a century from now? What is in their names, Jesus, Moses, Mohammad, Buddha that does not exist in Marx, Hegel, Plotinus, Plato, and Aristotle?

What is Anti-Christ?

That helps me to explain further what Satan could be. Messiah is not busy fighting Satan like a normal usual fight with goals ascribed to other affairs of humans. If it was that should not be categorised as something supernatural. That would be included into other famous entities and would be remembered in the same way. Messiah should have a unique mission and position not volunteered by other individuals. The position already offered to heavens, to earth to mountains and all rejected to accept. It should be the lowest so that all humans loath to accept. Should be the most difficult such that no other human can achieve to fulfill. See, Julius Caesar was living around the time of Jesus Christ. He has no attribution to us, people who are living right now. Everything around him are like him. They are not of significance to us let alone die or live for them. He was a political military leader with extreme capacity of a conqueror; a general, a statesman with power over a big part of earth that even in present time is almost impossible to rule in unification without dispute. All the time try to compare him with Jesus Christ with his donkey, his worn out robe with humble voice and demeanour. Well, you say statesmen and political and military leaders with any capacity cannot project them on a long history of humans. Everybody whether on the side of Jesus or against him approve this assertion. So this excludes Jesus Christ long standing position among humans due to he being a political leader. That also excludes the idea that He had been any type of rebellion or revolutionary leader since that capacity belongs to a man who is on the path to become a statesman or a general or a conqueror, like Julius Caesar, but perhaps with a bit more agreeable slogans. We do not know any instance of a rebellion leader who ever had come to lead the mind of humans for long enough time to rival the position of Jesus Christ. But we keep such an idea for further examinations. We compare a rebel with Jesus Christ to ratify appropriateness of that leader as a just leader. But, conversely, we never compare Jesus Christ with a rebel leader to ratify capacities of Jesus Christ. People follow Jesus not for his art of planing a rebel. There are certain zealots of religions who try to attribute such art to Jesus. That more happens in followers of Mohammad and Moses since these two messengers of god had to show some political leadership in certain part of their lives. Similarly, for Jesus we saw that he needed food and sleeping, and He said that he had an earthly material being as he appeared among the sons of man. We should separate these two parts and we are doing this.

Disappointed?

For the reasons I wrote in previous post, people searching to know about "Messiah" when they come here or to the Messiah's website become disappointed of not finding what they want. They want Messiah follow them in their religions and their desires. They wrongly believe Messiah is something as their private asset to help them to fight with the rival local church or to a rival religion. They believe Messiah should repair their Mosques and temples and start a war with infidels and sides for a group. We know Jesus Christ said that He belonged to all humanity even those who committed atrocity to him. One can deprive himself from Messiah but Messiah cannot deprive Him from the others. If Messiah is the peace and justice crystallised in form of human how could he be property of a certain faith or certain aggregate of people. That fact is true for Abraham, and Moses and Mohammad and Buddha and Zoroaster, too. They belong to all humanity. They all were the same element cast in different times. Where they are there is no time passing by so they are only one. No time passing Him by; He passes by the time. They pass by the time, seen to the eyes of humans as different people. All came to humans to suffer and to show to human that Satan, is their enemies. Ahriman can exist and can be seen by material eyes in the material form and every time Antichrist cheats the human again with the same trick and human repeats the original sin, as if no lesson has learned and then Messiah pays for the sin of man with suffering anew and save the humanity towards eternity, towards eternal existence towards "coming here to stay!"

Overcoming the Other Loud Voices

Not all the campaign is with the scientific minds. It contains less than ten percent of the effort. There are more powerful sectors of the society to fight the idea of "Messiah" resurrection. Most of them are from previous religions. Many have a legacy of religion in their minds without practicing a religion or without being sacrilegious or atheist. If they are asked they claim themselves as, say, a Christian. Sometimes they say that their parents were belonged to such and such religion but they only believe in God or a super gracious being as the God. Many are deeply drenched in superstitions rather than being religious and normally the boundary between two is vague and blurred for them. There are fights inside them that which is the orthodoxy of religion and which are the superstitions from ancient stories and paganism among them. For a scientific minded atheist there is no difference between religion and superstition but inside the doctrine of religion such a boundary exist and is the subject of much controversy. For example, a monist theologian might become philosophically skeptical of the existence of the material world based on the idea that the Almighty abstract God why needs a material world to exist and how matter might emanate from the all abstract mind of God. Then he knows conceiving of the God as an old man on a throne a superstition of commoner masses and a blasphemy if that idea proposed by an educated priest. All the existing religions are based on the idea that their religion is the most perfect and ultimate instruction of God and they have a scientific positivist kind of reason for that as that after their prophet or messenger human beings have entered in a phase of being mature and grown up enough such that no further direct contact of human with the God is necessary anymore. Only if a bad happens to the faith it is because the followers do not carefully follow the rules as originally advertised by the God and their messenger and are written in their scripts. And, they assume, if they do that they can overcome to other religions and blasphemies and injustice that has gripped the earth.

How Much Knowledge?

So far, hence, I put myself in front line of scientific thinking in campaigning with all superstitions already advertised by all religions regarding the "Messiah." In doing so I cannot eliminate further counter-claims of scientifically minded modern humans. How? For the first, because not all my readers who believe they are scientific minded are so as they assert. These are one group: assume that you are an atheist young student of engineering, then I assert that one cannot measure the position and velocity of a particle at the same time without sacrificing the precision of one quantity in favour of the second quantity. I further assert that it is inherent of nature; nature blocks your measurement not your skill, knowledge and tools. As my young atheist is not familiar with "Quantum Mechanics" and only he has got some familiarity with classical mechanics he might vilify me as saying a non-scientific proposition. Then he does not continue listening to me, rejecting everything as a whole erroneous package of frequently told and falsified dogmas of the antiquity. The second group could be time tasted people of some cultivation and education such as an artist, a physician, a journalist who have other dogmas wrongly and in a scrambled shape resided in their minds such as "Galileo Galilei proved that there was no God and any angel in the heaven by looking into a telescope and for this reason burnt at steak by the order of Inquisition!" They also do not listen any further to me. Another group does not come to the frontiers of human unknown for discovery. They are not eager to come. I cannot drag them to that place. There is another group who recognises the humble predicaments of vague origin as the scientific truth. One example of that I could find in a TV commercial that, "such a cream can eliminate the wrinkles of your face skin!" Said with a scientific tone. Then it was based on the (subjective) idea of eighty persons who used that cream.
A very important group I have found are those who seek "Messiah" as the embodiment, resurrectimn, of their ancient prophet. That could be true but needs and waits for your investigation to prove or reject.

Superstitious?

People have become scientific minded these days. They say, the idea of Messiah is fanaticism, superstition and something belonged to past times when people could not solve the problems of nature and had to attribute them to one or more super beings. Although all of these propositions are easily subject to challenge, I have tried not to become engaged with them until I feel that the backgrounds and foundations are built enough. So far, I have not said anything that could be in contradiction to any scientific achievements of human. In contrast, I have refuted, doubted and rejected any previous idea regarding this phenomenon, Messiah, as it is taught mostly by religions.On the other hand, I do not say that such an idea, the Messiah is weird and rejected. By no means it is so. Almost more than ninety five percent of humans deeply believe in a way or other way in such phenomenon among them very great living and deceased scientists. Many people, earn money by publishing books and gathering people and associations and organizations, even armies and fans around them, selling this idea to masses and masses of humans. Nothwithstanding, they are in the first line of defence together with sacreligious groups if such a person with all correct descriptions attributed to him emerges in front of their face.

Conversion of Faith

I discussed many sound scientific ideas, so far, to show that my claim for existence of Messiah in nature, similar to other phenomena, is within the reach of investigation of ordinary humans. Although, I reiterate that believing it, at the end, is a matter of conversion. This conversion can be seen in every aspect of scientific and daily life. For example, you have seen that repeatedly you want to prove a fact for your colleague, for your spouse, for your students and children. They do not accept it from you. This is the nature of human (and other beings) for protection of integrity of its individuals. Overweight people do not accept your advice. Smokers do not accept your advice. People of high blood pressure do not commit them to a diet. All these happen in face of scientifically proven and globally observable facts. Suddenly, one smoker quits and never comes back to smoking. One overweight becomes slim. The seriousness of some of these facts is a matter of life and death, a matter of better life and more miserable life. Still, only a conversion of faith can help the victim to accept the scientific propositions involved. All the time human finds the devil easier to follow than what is good for him. Human is not rational. That irrationality is part of his nature to sustain his existence against unpredictable and random adversaries. If human was rational then his blue print and pattern of life would become revealed for his adversaries, the destructive forces of nature, and they could foil human plans for survival. Human and other animals are like guerrillas fighting deep inside the enemies territories. They should not carry any identification, weapon or anything that makes their enemies suspicious. If suddenly an engagement with enemy patrols occurred they should be able to use any improvised idea against it. This is partly physical, partly spiritual and partly definable in terms of "information." For example, language or dance in humans are such weapons. I used the term spiritual. It has my own meaning here. By that I do not mean preaching anything you already familiar with.