Posts
Messiah Psychoanalyst
September 2011
Peter Jones Blog
on
Resurrection of Messiah
as
Promised to happen at
the beginning of 3rd Millennium
Dedicated to you that believe Messiah
to be resurrected at the beginning of this millennium but you do not
search for Him.
PJ
Begin:
In my sacred name I begin.
------
Obstacles on the Road:
Before I advertise my mission, I should clear the
way for future believers many obstacles from the road.
------
Messiah Is not a Preacher:
You should not confuse me with a preacher, or a
monk, a rabbi, or a mullah or similar individuals. I have come to
accredit all of them and to eradicate all of them.
------
A One-man Army:
How one man could convince other people that he is
the promised Messiah. What characteristics and attributes he has got
that others do not have? I discuss these things for any possible
period of time until only one person becomes convinced. That is,
then, the end of Messiah's mission on earth. From that one person
many come in future generations. It is like creation of Adam. Up to
this point is anything non-scientific? Is anything against the
evolution and physics and biology? Could you solve the story of
creation of "man" from a single one?
------
Christ and Antichrist and Impostor-Christ:
Coming of Messiah needs only three elements to be
realized: Christ, Antichrist, and impostor-Christ. Christ or Messiah
is the holly saviour of human. Antichrist is the enemy of human and
enemy of Christ. Impostor-Christ is the tool of Antichrist and the
horse of ITS carriage. Christ has two entity or two sides. One side
is heavenly and godly and the other side is His earthly, human
entity. Antichrist is not a human. It has carcass of human that drags
IT around and makes IT able to talk. It lacks human soul.
Impostor-Christ is a human with two sides: one devilish side attached
to the will of Antichrist. His other side is a human in ambition of
gaining power of god over all humans. He works for Antichrist to
learn from IT, asks Antichrist to help him to know how he can reach
to this materialistic power. Antichrist is something like an ape. IT
is enemy of human; like a germ, not for having any human aim. IT just
wants humans not to exist by its instinct not by having a goal. This
two complete each other Impostor provides for Antichrist and
Antichrist promises power to him, in return.
------
Antichrist Is a Blank in the Darkness:
I use the pronoun [IT] and adjective [ITS] for the
Antichrist. I sometimes use this bracket [ ] to underline it. It is
due to the fact that I use English language and in this language "he"
is used for referring to male and "she" refers to female.
The Antichrist is not male or female or any object of human relation
such as an animal. IT is a non-being. IT is a pseudo being. IT is a
blank in a blank background that cannot be seen. How can you
recognize a blank in a blank background? You should dye IT with some
paint. IT is painted with carcass of a human. IT is a darkness in a
pitch dark background. IT can be seen by reflecting light that IT
steals from Messiah. IT is in thirst of that light. It is the reason
that IT chases Messiah, 'The Christ'.
------
Reason for Being:
My raison d'etre, that is, the reason for coming
in this world is to prove that such a being, Ahriman or Satan can
exist. You have different pictures in your mind as "Antichrist"
or "Satan" or "Ahriman" or "Devil" that
has come to your cognition as symbolic description of that entity. It
is not correct to believe that Antichrist is a being who has horns
and tail and teeth like knife and fiery eyes or having hoofs instead
of feet. There is no way that in nature such things can be created
without being related to other creations of nature, without evolution
and without having any relation with human realities. Devil should be
in a way that Christ can prove ITS existence, using the reasonings
and knowledge of human, but put humans on a fork road branching into
the believing or into the denial in ordinary capabilities of ordinary
people such that non-believers cannot bring excuse that they had
offered something beyond the grasp of human mind and believers know
that they have accepted it by reason not by dogma. Motive of
believers should be faith and not gaining power and wealth over the
other people and non-believers should not believe upon regret of loss
of power and wealth, but should come forward as a conversion and
transcend of mind. It is not true also to attribute normal
disabilities of human beings to Ahriman as a sign for recognizing IT.
Those disabilities such as having one blind eye or limping or
crawling on the earth are partly stigmas usual at ancient times to
show hostility towards enemies, used to show enmity to Devil and
partly they were symbols for enlightening human beings about
behaviour of Devil.
------
Messiah Is Understandable:
All that discussion is aimed at the result that if
one is to accept ideas such as Messiah and Antichrist, then arguments
and evidences should be limited to whatever that limit the others:
all should be explainable within usuals of this material world. Does
that mean that these are just symbols, as many followers of religions
interpret theirs? Answer from Messiah is not affirmative. Messiah is
a real human in this side. He is the "perfect human."
Antichrist looks in all aspects like a human being in this side. IT
is the "perfect enemy" of human being, the "perfect
plotter." These two are not symbols within "now."
They'll be symbols in future generations when saved humans help to
salvage other human beings.
------
Messiah Is the Perfect Human:
But nature is not a simple domain of understanding
except with an open eye. Using knowledge and science and arguments of
reason is subject to variation in different individuals. Messiah is
not an idea dedicated to a certain group of learned people. See,
there is something common, but, in all levels and stages of material
world. Dead crystals of matter grow layer by layer to augment and
fill more space. Simple building blocks of universe make themselves
in more organised shapes. Plants grow to touch more lights from
environment and animals move around with curiosity to find out more,
until their curiosity shapes something transcendental as human
"mind." And human mind, still searches in hope of a higher
level of beingness. This belongs to all human beings as a generality
not particularity of learned individual. Messiah says now, "There
is no individuality!" We have only one. That one is Messiah, the
Perfect Human who suffers for the ancient sin of man.
------
Significance of Time:
We have come to this point of discussion that
there is a material world outside of us, or inside of our mind that
overpowers us and there is "us" who wants to overpower that
world. We are used to idea of god outside of time and place, out of
this material world and the world as its creation, if we believe to
such being. Then we say a saviour comes at the beginning of each
millennium. We never ask ourselves, "For such almighty being
what is the significance of a millennium, specially now with the
apparent knowledge that we have accrued regarding events that have
happened in the universe in billions of years. Hence, we do not enter
the present discourse if we want to put our basics upon things such
as "Why the almighty has not created all of us with the highest
qualities that we desire and within an environment that is ideal for
our perpetual joy?" Or when disaster happens to us, "Why
the almighty repeatedly and on a minute by minute basis does not
intervene and relieve our disasters and we should toil overcoming
difficulties of material world with a promise - never reported by
anybody as being verified - of a bless after death from this material
world?" If already we are engraved with these ideas, usually we
do not approach to such domains of discussions that we have here. In
that case we belong to a group of "others" with "other"
outlooks and attitudes. They might become converted in future and
enlightened with "other" ideas and then come back and taste
yet "other" outlooks and horizons. For those who are
interested in present discussion, "They should wash them of any
judgements they ever have had." This is the meaning of
baptising.
------
Pain of Messiah:
Beginning of our argument is pain. We say Christ
was suffered for the sin of man. So if we want to ask god for
alternative creation of world, a world relieved of pain why should
that god's incipience should be accompanied by pain? Is it similar to
delivering a child accompanied with pain of labour?
------
Evolution of Nature:
I said either we have the material world inside
our minds or we have it outside it independent of our existence. Both
will get us to the same position. Both are in context. Then I said
that Messiah uses the knowledge and wisdom of His contemporaries.
Otherwise, He cannot argue for his trueness. One important knowledge
of contemporaries is acceptance of evolution. It is said as the
"survival of fittest." Does that mean that Messiah is in
favour of fittest? Fittest is known to nature a posteriori.
A priori Messiah is only in favour of fittest and nobody
knows that who is to be fittest. Hence, everybody is the fittest for
the future of the universe. It is not a matter of a single element
and a single factor to determine who or what is the fittest. Messiah
has to protect all equally regardless of any quality that they have.
Messiah is the "defender" of all as it is promised.
------
Defender:
From that, a name attributed to Messiah is
"Defender."
------
Messiah: The Defender:
Messiah is defender of all. There is no difference
for Him if one is poor or rich or innocent or sinful, or one who has
committed murder, incest, molesting, robbery or violence, or he is
pious and benevolent. Messiah looks to them indifferently. Messiah
mission is something completely categorically different. All these
things, rebuking or encouraging these, fall inside the missions of
all human. Messiah is doing something unique. He has a unique
function. We should separate Him from others. There should be a way
for ordinary human to differentiate Him. It is not a game of
hide-and-seek that he comes and goes and suffers and we do not
understand. Should we look through the history and behold some one
that has horns and tail and hooves and some one who walk on the water
and then decide that that was Antichrist and this one was Christ.
Such easy observation does not need to have faith. Why such thing
should happen at all? Based on what experience or what knowledge of
human such thing should become feasible?
------
How Satan Looks Like?
We understand that in our material world it is not
possible to find out a being that can force humans to obedience and
that being looks different from us. If he has got blazing eyes and
knife-like teeth and picket ears and these attributions we visualize
as Satan or Ahriman then that thing makes us so frightened that it
can not deceive us any more, we all could recognize it as a devil
enemy and should start to fight back with it. Moreover what such a
being might ask us to fulfil for it? IT does not need anything with
that shape to be affordable by us to offer, and has not got anything
for us to return. Then we would ask if that entity is a single and
uniquely created entity out of what and where and when? Has it got a
type with other individuals of its kind? Why those others do not join
to its communion? Therefore if we decide to believe that there is a
deceit and there is an enemy, it is not as easy as seeing an unusual
creature and decide that it is Satan. Likeliness of finding this type
of creation in nature is nil.
------
Difficult or Easy?
At the end is it easy or is it difficult to
recognize who is Messiah or what is Satan? We have heard that there
is a bridge narrower than a hair and sharper than a blade that takes
us to beatitude, to perpetual never ending happiness.
------
Faith or Reason?
To know Messiah should we rely on findings of
science and look into nature, or we know Him by faith and conversion
of mind and passion of heart? Everything points to Him if we have
kept our intuition and curiosity alight. The world that previous
known messengers of God claimed their invitation to people were much
simpler and smaller than us. We only know stories mostly narrated by
words of mouth without details that now we are interested in our
investigations. I said things without already have cleared them such
as "God" or "messenger" or "invitation."
Most important is we used modifier "previous." Those of us
who believe in idea of Messiah believe He is resurrection of the same
identity as "Jesus Christ" of Nazareth. Hence there is no
"previous" modifier to be used. We should say "same"
not "previous." It is correct. Messiah says, "It is
correct all are the same entity. He is all. It is the meaning of Him
was son of God." It is easy. Just open your heart in search of
truth.
------
Messiah and Contemporary Science:
One dimension of previous assertions was using
scientific knowledge of the time for understanding Messiah, The
Christ, and enemies of human Antichrist, and Impostor-Christ. Good
news is that these concepts are consistent with the scientific
knowledge of human gathered by observation of nature contemporary to
the era that Messiah appears in His earthly appearance. That event
creates only controversy among the learned people who live at that
time. Some accept Him with signs that He has. Some reject Him as a
superstition or mocking him as insane or accuse Him of not being
righteous. Some argue that they are waiting for such a saviour and
they do all preparations but this one is not their expected one.
------
Prophets Are Consistent with Science:
This is always centre of all controversies. We
have soul contradicting with body. We have spiritual contradicting
with material. We have mind contradicting with matter. We have
subjectivity of the world in contradiction to objectivity. And these
pairs are endless. One group attach to the idea that first is the
truth and the other group attach to truthfulness of the second. Some
believe that each part is the enemy of the second part of the pair
and each side of animosity brings about its own adversary to fight
and then reconcile and co-exist to bring their enemy out and this
goes and goes. These are not part of mission of Messiah to say pros
for or cons against, as if Messiah talks for yellow flowers and
rejects red flowers. Those discussions are part of beauty of human
mind and they continue until human continues and they remain in the
mind of universe forever. Human is not supposed to solve them. When
there is no such mission for human mind to solve these conflicts then
in first place it is the mission of Messiah that not to solve them,
either. All the war is about this simple notion. Only it is for the
Satan that "knows." Only that enemy of human puts an end to
this eternal problem. Messiah says as, "This conflict shall
never stop! This is the meaning of the War of God with Satan!"
------
Obstacles Are Numerous:
Having a look at previous posts reveals it for us
that such a claim as being Messiah and descriptions of Antichrist and
Impostor-Christ comes out to be extremely difficult to prove. Every
day we have a claimant and his voice soon becomes suffocated among
the plethora of arguments and counter-claims. I should exhaust all
these to categories and bring reasons to make them clearer. We also
have not a unified understanding of mission of Messiah accepted by
all controversing sides and any reason to guide us to believe that
such a phenomena can happen. That gives an insight to the fact that
why people believe that Jesus Christ could convince only twelve
people in his lifetime to his righteousness; the next one he tried to
add to his followers came to be a traitor according to stories. We
know that even the number "twelve" has a load of ancient
believes and could be just a symbol of a handful of followers and
perhaps he could convince only one person or two. When Moses came
back from the mountain he found only his brother and his wife waiting
for him. The remaining of followers had already joined to the
"Antichrist" and "Impostor," enemies of Moses and
humans at that time. In story of Noah he could only convince a
handful of people during eight hundred years of his campaign to
believe in a flood, not even his own son among them. We have heard
this about Lot at story of Sodom and Gomorrah. Story of Adam comes to
me in this shape. If I can convince only one person, he will be Adam
to multiply later to all human race. Messiah says, "You shall
not confuse my very existence and my good news as symbols. Symbols
are for future humans to interpret my message, not for me when I
deliver them."
------
Chains of Messengers of God:
In our western Christian culture we believe in a
chain of messengers bringing good news from God. Some names are very
familiar for us from our childhood. Many of us are namesake to these
prophets or names from their stories and the people related to them
as respectful. Among them we know a handful most important. These are
Adam, Noah, Abraham, Moses and Jesus Christ. In this chain with
continuation of their tradition in another branch of descendants of
Abraham we also are familiar with name of prophet Muhammad that in
our studies we find his experience similar to experience of other
prophets in that chain. From other nations we find two more names
with similar attributions. One is Siddhartha Buddha from India and
the other is Zoroaster from Iran. We have not any information of such
claims, accepted by great number of populations and during a long
period of time, similar to those handful of people that I named here
as prophets.
------
Millennium: A Rough Chronology:
Is there a secrete in millenniums? I have created
a rough chronology of messengers of God. Dates are not certain for
humans. Already I discussed briefly if the time has a significance
for God. I discuss further, but later. Adam came to earth six
thousand years ago. After six hundred years came Noah. It was five
thousand four hundred years ago. After one thousand four hundred
years came Abraham. It was four millennium ago, and two millennium
after Adam. After six hundred years came Moses. Almost three thousand
four hundred years ago and two millennium after Noah. Then after one
thousand four hundred years Jesus Christ came to earth. It was two
millennium after Abraham. Six hundred years after him Muhammad came
among people. It was two millennium after Moses. Now it is one
thousand four hundred years after Muhammad and two millennium after
Jesus Christ.
------
Messiah and Modern Science:
Modern science, what ever created as experience of
human in observing the nature from mostly sixteenth century to
present times is based on the "objective" and empirical
data gathered from such observations, in contrast to scholastic and
"cloister walking" discussions and theories of pre-modern
eras. This scientific "outlook" has been absorbed,
digested, assimilated and integrated with the texture of the minds of
all human beings who are living on the earth right now. This modern
consciousness is regardless and usually opposing to the legacy of
"faith" that modern people identify themselves as
followers. As I said, Messiah cannot invite people to His
righteousness by denying this new consciousness or declaring that all
fossils and traces of birth of the earth and the sun and galaxies and
big bangs are created by almighty six thousand years ago at the same
time of creation of Adam to test us if we are believer or not.
Neither Messiah can say that these are just theories and have not
been proved yet. And He cannot say that He is reconciling the
religions and their ancient books with modern science nor says that
by careful reading of those texts one can find all theories of
evolution and atoms and galaxies explained correctly in symbols and
codes inside those texts. Messiah cannot say that those texts are for
comfort of souls and invitation to psychological conversion of
spirits in their own turn and modern knowledge is for the overcoming
on the material world and the body and flesh of humans in another
perspective. These are cliches of preachers and clerics to mostly run
a successful career and personal life style. Messiah is the most
important fact of nature and His invitation should not be confused
and desecrated with such trivialities tested times and times again.
Messiah suffers for the original sin of man. The sin that threw man
out of Garden of Eden
------
Messiah and Modern Science:
Modern science, what ever created as experience of
human in observing the nature from mostly sixteenth century to
present times is based on the "objective" and empirical
data gathered from such observations, in contrast to scholastic and
"cloister walking" discussions and theories of pre-modern
eras. This scientific "outlook" has been absorbed,
digested, assimilated and integrated with the texture of the minds of
all human beings who are living on the earth right now. This modern
consciousness is regardless and usually opposing to the legacy of
"faith" that modern people identify themselves as
followers. As I said, Messiah cannot invite people to His
righteousness by denying this new consciousness or declaring that all
fossils and traces of birth of the earth and the sun and galaxies and
big bangs are created by almighty six thousand years ago at the same
time of creation of Adam to test us if we are believer or not.
Neither Messiah can say that these are just theories and have not
been proved yet. And He cannot say that He is reconciling the
religions and their ancient books with modern science nor says that
by careful reading of those texts one can find all theories of
evolution and atoms and galaxies explained correctly in symbols and
codes inside those texts. Messiah cannot say that those texts are for
comfort of souls and invitation to psychological conversion of
spirits in their own turn and modern knowledge is for the overcoming
on the material world and the body and flesh of humans in another
perspective. These are cliches of preachers and clerics to mostly run
a successful career and personal life style. Messiah is the most
important fact of nature and His invitation should not be confused
and desecrated with such trivialities tested times and times again.
Messiah suffers for the original sin of man. The sin that threw man
out of Garden of Eden.
------
Universe in Antique Mind:
Considering the most recent religion. Its message
comes to human around fourteen hundred years ago. What was the size
of universe and also the attitude of humans at that time. Earth was
limited to a twenty million square kilometre round the Mediterranean
sea with boundaries in unknown places in western sides of India
Central Asia, Caucasus north and south of Mediterranean sea and
somewhere in Ethiopia. During six hundred years from Jesus Christ to
Mohammad, individuals from Christendom had gone to expeditions
further North, East and West of Europe, converted many but not all of
scattered inhabitants of those regions. Earth was a lonely place in
the universe inhabited by humans who were living just few miles far
from the heaven above that was like a neighbourhood filled with Deity
or deities and angles and familiar phenomena. God, from heaven or
Olympus or similar places, all the time was watchful of its small
dominion in Levant or Hellas or small islands of Polynesia in shape
of an old man or a powerful father or a parrot and in constant need
of golds and sacrifice and prayers and burning scents, who was
administrating those people living there with immediate contingents
of angles and daemons and thunders or diseases.
------
Let's Leave Ancient Mind (1):
When we think to religions, we start to become
inconsistent and to negotiate with our modern thoughts. We separate
wisdom and faith as two entities one belongs to mind - wisdom - and
the other belongs to heart: religion. We say and gradually believe
that we can live with such dualism. If we get a simple flu that can
be managed with over the counter pain killers then it is all due to
modern biochemistry, but if it is an unknown harsh flu with muscle
pains we stay at bed, will have natural soups made by God given
vegetables full of natural remedies and moaning "Oh, my God!"
As if God is a management mentor and gradually empowers us for
delivery of new missions already done by him. Our philosophy,
psychology and scientific outlook is also fits in that simple
attitude of flu patient. Atheists and materialist philosophers and
positivists also reason in a similar fashion that fits in that simple
example to refute it. Scientists and philosophers were amazed of
creation of God when they were looking in night sky, seeing God has
created holes in the sky such that part of the ethereal light of
heaven can penetrate to earth people who had sacrificed for His altar
to give them a sign of his omnipresence at night and scare daemons.
When all that replaced with a solar system and a fiery object as the
sun at its centre they were amazed of creation of God when beholding
spectrum of elements burning in a flame. Then they were amazed of
electrons circling in a vast emptiness around a dense nucleon. Then
they were amazed of quarks and strings. This was the reason for
sacrilegious people to deny any god or religion, let alone the idea
of appearance of Messiah promised in ancient time as a saviour or son
of the God or a prophet.
------
Let's Leave Ancient Mind (2):
So we are used to think about God as equivalent to
our ignorance, similar to what atheists criticize about the idea of
God and religion. God means ignorance in this approach. If we know
about something, then God does not exist at that dominion for ever.
If we know partially, then God exists partially. If we get to next
ignorance, the next unsolved puzzle then God comes back and only God
knows that thing. The solution for that is to find a view that
interweaves God and nature and our knowledge and our ignorance in a
unified texture. This is what can be achieved only by prophets. By
that I mean Jesus Christ included. Many of us believe Him not as a
prophet but as the Son of the God. That makes Him, nonetheless, a
prophet, a messenger from the Heavenly Father, God. Prophets
experience the universe in that unified beholding. They see, and they
ask people to believe them. People will not believe, except a dozen
people or less who can see, but not with all details. Prophets ask
people to experience the universe as much that they have the
endurance but if they believe the message from a deep understanding
and empathy to the messenger then they will get to the same position
as the prophet. We have conceived in our cognition that it is a high
position. We know a higher position safer with more freedom and
choice. Freedom means whim to choose. Choice means to fulfil our
whims. And we are the actor in between these two boundaries. These
two boundaries make our universe. Whatever human thinks from now to
eternity comes between these two boundaries.
------
Modern Mind (1):
Universe in the modern mind is not that small pond
and human as a big fish in it. Earth is not even a dot of dust in the
hurricane of creation. The whole solar system is that dot. Human has
no significance in this universe. For the universe, he does not exist
with any effect at all. The entire chain of human evolution is just a
fraction in a fraction of life time of universe. For human something
is happening there but for the universe nothing is happening here.
Our humble events happens among the tumult of explosion of galaxies
that accommodate billions of stars similar to our sun and birth of
new galaxies and billions of stars inside them, crash of such
unimaginable bodies together and collapse and crush of such immense
bodies into the smaller bodies. In such a scene we expect that
Messiah should be resurrected to prepare armies and battalions for an
expedition around the good ancient Levant for the sake of few hundred
angry people. That means that God is not a cosmological concept. He
is a political activist in search of popularity and winning over a
rival political party. If God is in charge of such troublesome
universe, then why he does not change the result of polls? This is
another reason that tells human that he should put away whatever he
already believes is the reason for Messiah resurrection.
------
Modern Mind (2):
We got to the point that Messiah, or Jesus Christ
comes to take Jerusalem from the hands of infidels and gives it to
the hands of faithful people. Then who are infidels and who are
faithful people? On the other hand Mahdi comes and take yet another
group to the rule of the world. On the third place Siddhartha comes
and destroys mosques in India and rebuild temples of worshippers. In
another place Bahraam comes and fights with Ahriman and rebuilds
Zoroastrians fire-temples in place of other temples. We have Cyrus
(the same as Christ) and Hormuz (Lord in Zoroastrian faith) as well,
and numerous promised ones for smaller groups. Hence, instead of a
promised peace, a great chaos is on the way by resurrection of a
promised Messiah? And the God among such a business of galaxies and
billions stars and black holes should come and intervene in
settlement of boarder lines between neighbouring countries and
rebuilding of different types of ancient temples. You, who is waiting
for Him, where is your ancient temple you want to rebuild? It is not
far. Messiah is that temple. In that temple galaxies are small
marbles in your hands. When you and Him become unified, you see that
everything is just. You are after the sanctuary to house you.
------
Towards More Understanding:
We so far briefly discussed few trivial facts
observable in front of any inquiring faithful of any religion. I
recapitulate these predicates:
- Messiah is as if an ordinary average human being.
- Antichrist looks like other humans.
- Messiah does not resurrect to solve some earthly problem of some special groups of humans.
- Messiah should be explainable to average humans with average understanding of contemporary knowledge.
- Messiah is part of the texture of universe even if conceived by contemporary knowledge.
- Messiah, hence, is as natural phenomenon as the other phenomena of nature.
Even these assertions are enough to prove that, “I
am the Messiah,” since no other believer or unbeliever yet has
looked to this phenomenon in this way. There are similar issues that
my bright reader can appreciate. For example,
- Pain of Messiah is not what we have conceived so far.
- Miracles of Messiah are not those mentioned in the history and we might expect.
Messiah resurrects similar to the way that we know
about Jesus Christ or Moses or Mohammad or Abraham or Noah. Messiah
at our time is not a privileged prophet different with those. That
phenomena repeats and separates a group of people from the others.
Believers get bliss. Non-believers burn in the fire of hell as it is
ready in front of us.
Similar to those, Messiah at our time does not ask
to be rewarded. He does his ontological mission whether to become
appreciated by anybody or not. That mission is winning the God in war
with Satan. Son of God, the human being, should overcome, by passing
the test of Satan, over the Satan.
------
Spectrum of Natural Phenomena:
One very observed consequence of modern mind is
recognition of spectrum in all phenomena happening in nature. It
means that when you single out a class of inter-related events in
nature you can infer that those come in a full spectrum. You can see
it in very weakest form. Then you can see it in stronger form. Then
you move towards more stronger and at last it become very dominant to
the extreme. Usually you start to categorise the phenomena at hand.
At first different types inside the class seems to become separated
easily and strongly but when you want to start to describe them then
individuals of each category show border line characteristics that
blur their boundaries with the neighbouring category and defuse
together the lines that you have drawn to separate cases. For
instance, in their chart, among chemical elements you say this group
of elements are halogens. They are not metal and they are in gaseous
form, aha except bromine which is liquid. And now you have another
halogen which is solid and you become happy that bromine is
transition from gaseous halogens to solid halogens. Yes iodine is
solid but not as solid as iron. Even for attributing the modifier
"solid" you cannot sharply categorize ideas. Iodine is
solid but it easily sublimes due to the partial pressure of its
surface layers that do not satisfy a sharp definition of solidness.
It is solid but it shows characteristics of a gas besides, as you
expect from a halogen. It is this and it is that. Then again there is
another halogen, astatine, if we could have it enough we could not
say halogens are non-metals. Astatine is a complete metal and you can
imagine that any halogen a layer after astatine is as metal as iron.
If you study that little place that you call the chart of chemical
elements all the laws of nature until the end of the world are
outlined from the view point of philosophy of science. You start from
the element then you have to modify every attribution, and
attributions of attributions need to be modified again and at the end
you are at the beginning. You have one hundred items and one hundred
types, only vaguely categorised in groups perhaps just to satisfy a
taste. They are all different from each other as they should and they
come in a full spectrum from the lightest to heaviest and each item
has attributions that again cannot be described comprehensively with
a fully agreed phrasing. You only compromise for the practicality: to
be practical and pass to another stage. You draw the curtain back but
behind the curtain there is no news; there is only another curtain.
The satisfaction comes from drawing the curtain and from the fact
that human lives span but for a short moment in the life of the
material world and he has not a goal of understanding the entire
creation and the truth of the world but likes to solve the problems
of living with less fear and hardship while he is alive. He is
pragmatic all the way. The beauty of the world and appreciation of
its ultimate truth only remains for god, and human to get rid of this
qualm assumes that such a being exists who in surrogacy is capable of
such an endeavour. But there comes moments in the life of any human
that he hears a voice, a sweet melody, from afar that invites him to
something unknown and something familiar and something very sweet and
something lost that he craves to feel and see and hear and touch and
taste and embrace and he knows that none of these feelings are
helpful for him to satiate that crave and to quench that thirst.
------
Between Two Layers:
To begin our study of human life we have to
inspect our environment that has cradled, nurtured and flourished the
life of ours and other living things. For a moment disregard the
destructions and fouls created recently by humans, the last two
centuries or better try to imagine the earth twelve thousand years
ago when villages were proliferating on the face of earth. Just
visualise it in your mind. Yes, it is like a paradise resort that you
can find only in advertisements. Even the horrifying diseases we know
in middle ages did not exist at those times. Those diseases were due
to populated spots and travel of population to other places who
carried germs of illness to other populated areas and made the death
of masses of people possible. This is one paradise lost. You might
believe that at that time there were cold and strife for food and
attack of beasts using human flesh as a prey for their own survival,
and incurable ailments of individuals and overall fear and ignorance
of human about the natural phenomena and other terrorising factors.
Still, these shortages did not have any effect on the fact that the
earth was a paradise as far as we consider the existence of the life
and with all destruction still has kept many of its original
features. Where this beautiful safe habitat is placed in the whole
universe? It is a thin layer between two layers. It is with all its
diversity of objects inside it a layer of at most fifteen kilometre
in its thickness, from the bottom of deepest ocean that you might
find any shape of living thing to the top of highest point in the
atmosphere that life can sustain. Arguments of observing very basic
elements of life such as the amino acids in the dust of galaxies does
not falsify my present discussion. This thin layer is confined
immediately by two hostile layers: one under very hot and suffocating
and one at the top very cold and again suffocating. That goes to
infinite at the top. As far as you go in either direction there is no
place to host any type of meaningful life. Well, as much we are busy
of any non-sense the reality is what I described. There is no help,
no miracle, no solution in either direction. It is death and death
and death without any angel, any way around any bypass path. How can
you grab galaxies as marbles in your hand. Have a look at night sky.
Invent something to make a relation between you and that at the top
or under the bottom.
------
We Should not Ask Why, or Should We?
Some scientists ridicule philosophers that
philosophers always ask, "Why." Scientist’s job is to
answer "How." I exhausted all these categories of people
who do not engage with our discussions in previous posts. If somebody
has not any question or any qualm or interest in knowing about the
beyond, this place has nothing to add to his knowledge. Those classes
of people do not exist in our world and we do not exist in their
world. I categorized different groups that never enter in our
discourse. Those scientists are among them. One can enter into
argument with another if both party can negotiate on some basic,
fundamental starting points for their argument. After this reminder,
I am interested to see if there is any non-scientific discourse in
the world. From the ancient time the question exist in our mind that
if all of our knowledge is gained through the experiment of nature or
we know things from the beginning by ourselves. For instance, when
you leave your house every morning to go to your work place, you do
not comeback every hour or every ten minutes to check that the house
is not on fire or being looted. How are you certain? Or why are you
certain? Is it due to experience? experience by induction? Have you
ever checked it once or twice and then decided that it is safe to be
far for a long time perhaps weeks or months in a trip or in a journey
abroad? Or from the first day you were confident that you could leave
your house without checking it frequently? Or did it start from the
time that we were in the caves, or perhaps earlier when we were on
the trees, and gradually we gained experience? We do not know if this
is an individual insight or it is a collective insight shared by
other humans. Our experience frequently breached in centuries when we
were back and bandits had attacked our houses. But sooner or later we
had to leave it again for a long time for gaining the bread. So for
having such a feeling we become engaged in a philosophical
argumentation. Even we could not decide what should we use: how or
why.
------
I Ask, "Why?"
I concluded that many of our questions cannot be
solved in the domain of modern science with the scope that scientists
have put forward for them. I said that it is their choice and Messiah
does not ask them otherwise. You invite a musician to play violin for
you. Thus you have invited a violinist. Now, you cannot ask him to
cook for you or even ask him to play cello instead of violin. It is
beyond your agreement. Only by a chance, he might become volunteer
for other tasks. My first question is not whether we need a Messiah.
My first question within the universe of my own discourse looks as if
a scientific question but it is not. It is a "Why?" Before
that I explain why it looks like a scientific one. It is related to
biological creation of life at its earliest stage: "Why a cell
divides?" I do not ask how it divides. I do not like any lecture
in biology in present position. I am interested in but in other usual
situations of daily life, not right now. I go to much earlier stages
of life and ask why an "RNA" divides. RNA is more primitive
than a cell and created earlier. Perhaps the answer to that could be
easier. We have similar questions about more basic entities in nature
such as, "Why crystals stack over each other and grow?"
These questions do not take us to domain of science. We do not allow
that. As they have closed that path for us we do not trespass either.
We give our answer; the answer that keeps us on our own way.
------
They ask, "Why?"
When you study the rituals of present religions of
the world they have certain restrictions on eating. Some ask the
followers not to eat any animal, or certain animals, or in doing that
they should follow certain rules. People, especially scientists ask
them why the religions have these abstains and rules. Different
followers also argue that the practice of the other religion is not
correct and theirs is correct. They use much reasoning for their
propositions. It all return to the division of RNA. To start to
appreciate or get an answer I ask why animals become fat in summer by
eating too much? People know the answer. Human also have such a
nature if left in nature. In summer there are more foods available in
the cycle of life and in winter that food becomes scarce. So animals
consume more and save it in the form of fat and in winter body of
animals can consume that fat and compensate for the scarcity of food.
So when there is no food there is fat there to keep you alive, to
help you survive by asking from that bag of fat. You want to live
forever once endowed with the gift of life. You have come here to
stay, not to leave. It is consistent with the work of universe. First
there was only a shapeless “something” then it evolved to
“forms;” say to quarks and leptons. Quarks came together built
proton. Protons come here to stay, to stay forever. It is not their
decisions. It is the universe as it exists. Quarks Grip together to
keep protons here. It is part of the machinery of nature. The next
more complex structure has the same destiny: to stay. Crystals
already I mentioned. So animals and humans have come here to enjoy
the life not for a short sojourn but to stay permanently. If they get
food they consume too much not as a greed but as the nature wants
them to live. Structure of RNA “knows” it in this way. What
happens if this structure decays. That structure knows that the
machinery of nature has turned and turned until that RNA as the next
ultimate structure is created and that creation is here to stay. So
there should be a mechanism to keep it here. If it decays and get
destroyed a replica should be available somewhere to be used as the
substitution, similar to the fat that is saved in the cell in case of
starvation. Hence RNA creates a replica of itself not as its “child”
but as his own entity to stay and enjoy the new type beingness
endowed to him in extremely complex environment and complicated form.
The whole solar system is engineered in a very careful design to
nurture creation of such being. If I need food and food does not
exist I call fat. If my own structure destroyed I am somewhere else
to be replaced. I have a back up of my blueprint.
As usual we remember that I said that I never mean
that we should observe the nature and from that to understand a
gracious being is hidden in a corner who can create wonderful things
and we should know him and pray him out of our amazement. These are
clichés of preachers and similar people who have their own agenda.
This is not my claim. I am only explaining a mechanism and answering
a “Why?” I am not amazed of these things.
------
He knows!
Therefore, there is a knowledge engraved in
protons, in terms of something, that he is there to stay and not
decompose. You say, likewise scientists, that many other things
decompose and the universe shrugs her shoulders and the universe does
not recognize our "good" staying proton from the
decomposing entities. I say that I am looking for staying entities
and the universe showing them to me as if it is different for her.
RNA says, "I know all things become rotten away. I want not to
be one of them. I want to stay!" So he creates a replica of
himself as a back up of him. He is in two places. Look in this way if
you are here to stay, my friend. He is in two places. none can be
recognized from the other. You, that is the cruel undifferentiating
nature, cannot destroy him except to find him in two places. You
never search for an entity in two places. Hence, it remains as if not
attacked. The fearful creature "knows" that it is not the
end. He can remember well of horrors of swelling and exploding stars
and galaxies and all those. The killing cold above, the burning heat
below. He continues replicating. They are all one. And the one is
globally all. They know they are many but connected globally by the
knowledge that they are here to stay. Where is God, then. He is right
here. He is that knowledge. God does not want that that knowledge
become discovered. If that comes to surface, the replication stops.
Each RNA becomes lonely and naked of his desire to stay.
------
You know:
If you know, then there is no God there. If you do
not know, then there is God there. It sounds familiar. There is an
outer and there is inner. Shapes in the inner world come into the
surface as symbols and thoughts. Now consider the fat that animal
consumes in hunger. Animal is not aware of any other being around.
That fat is personal and is used solely for his survival. Cell does
not share it with other beings. So he knows that there is some food
in a corner for emergency for him. What about his replica. He knows
that he has a replica in a corner as a back up that in case "exists."
Just that! Not that it exists independently. In an "existence
space" there are not two things. There is only one thing. If
"number one" decompose, then "number two" is
there as if nothing has happened. Each replica is just a shadow.
There is only one. Beyond science of RNA there is a meta-science of
knowledge in all replicas: they are just substitutes. They are one.
They are globally one and the same thing. They are personal replicas
of the same global RNA. They are not shared. All have this knowledge.
It is beyond the science. Science never can prove or disprove this
knowledge. It is not scientific. You cannot find it under scanning
tunnel electron microscope or more powerful device. You have to
believe it or reject it to the end of the world. Sometimes you
accept. Sometimes you cannot believe. You and I are the same as, that
very "first" RNA, only to prevent his decomposition. If he
decompose then I am here just to be used as the replica and that is
all, no importance, no uniqueness, no mission, just a replica to
prove that HE has come here to stay. When all die I am here still.
From proton came to RNA then it came to my turn. Perhaps after me
there is something more robust, more persisting to stay in the
ascending ladder of existence. Something more enduring than proton
and RNA and me is in the next step: just a piece of knowledge that,
"I am here to stay!"
------
HE Stays:
Then, we have not stars and galaxies and this or
that. We have only a proton that stays. HE is here to stay. If HE
decompose then the whole universe goes. Then a new universe should
come out. Then a new God should appear. We do not have trees and
gnats and fish and eagle and Socrates and Jesus and Heisenberg. We
only have that very first "RNA" who decided to make a copy
of himself and put in a corner in case of his decomposition a copy
remains here to stay. If HE goes then the life should begin anew. The
solar system should be created again. The stars should begin to come.
The proton should be created anew. It needs a new God to come to the
throne, then. A new King claims the kingdom of heaven. It is
necessary that Messiah resurrects. We are at the end but at the
beginning. This is that happens every day. It is written in every
language and creed and sign and hint. It is written everywhere: on
trees, on mountains, on rivers, on clouds. This looks poetical. Is
not it? You know it that way. Proton has the blue print of all the
decomposing universe in one code, "Stay!" RNA has the blue
print of all the universe in one code, "Stay, proton stay!"
And Messiah has the blue print of all, "All stay!"
------
Some Chemistry: Artificial Elements, Anti-matter,
Artificial Atoms (1):
These ideas help me to give insights to accepting
what you might consider as impossible, or improbable. It is known
that all the world, all the living and non-living things are made out
of some 85 chemical elements. These elements have been discovered,
separated and studied by humans and by some law of nature are
arranged in a table, periodic table of elements. By those laws, few
places in the table had been left empty without humans know any
element in the nature to put in those places and no reasonable
attempt of scientists could conclude to their discovery until
scientists became convinced that due to known rules of nature those
places will be left empty forever. The elements that should occupy
those places were too unstable and had been decayed hastily to other
elements just after they had been forged in the furnace of nature.
Thus never got the opportunity to wait for the creation of life and
intelligent life to discover them. But from the middle of twentieth
century, scientists could imitate that process of forging elements
and artificially created them. Though normally they exist with their
elemental identities for a short time and quickly decay to more
stable elements nevertheless chemists could study their chemical
behaviour and became certain that they are the same elements that
should put in the empty boxes of the table. Besides these empty
places there were places beyond the last discovered elements of
nature. Scientists further advanced to create artificial elements for
these extra places until the point that it seems impossible or very
difficult at present time to go further. These attempts have resulted
to have a table of one hundred and eighteen elements of naturally
occurring (eighty eight)and artificially made elements (thirty) all
together at present time. Some of these elements came to be so useful
that factories are built to produce them in tons and being used as
commodities of commerce. We should consider that even the artificial
elements are natural but their short lives prohibited them to come in
human hands after billions years that has passed from the creation of
elements. There is nothing surprising or unusual in terms of nature
for them more than what we know regarding the natural elements. They
are all at their right places as dictated by the law of nature. This
was for artificial elements. Next we get to topic of "Anti-matter."
------
Some Chemistry: Artificial Elements, Anti-matter,
Artificial Atoms (2):
We could not see any thing being unnatural in
artificial elements. They are part of the nature but very unstable,
very short living compared to other elements. Anti-matter is another
artificially made phenomenon of science. In this form nature of atoms
is antagonist with the material elements of our world. Every
electrical charge of antimatter is contradicting ours. Our electrons
have negative charges, theirs have positive charge. If these two meet
they annihilate and burn each other to pure energy without any ashes
remain out of them. There remains no charge or matter to be confined
at a point. they becomes all something like heat of an oven
dissipating. The proton of our world is a positive charge, the
protons of antimatter have negative charges. Again these two are
antagonist and cannot live together. They annihilate each other if
they meet. For those things that have not any charge, like neutrons
also there exist some antimatter neutron. If they meet there will be
annihilation too. They are like to tops one turns clockwise the other
turns the other way. If they meet each other they cannot decide which
way they should turn so better to dissipate than not to turn. We can
imagine a world that every bit is made out of the antimatter and has
not any contact with our material world. In that world also
everything is natural and smooth moving and we have a table of eighty
ninety elements and there is nothing surprising for its intelligent
inhabitants or for humans. Only that we cannot find a way to their
world and they cannot find one to ours. Except that in each world
advanced scientists can artificially made few atoms of the
anti-matter, of the anti-world for demonstration of such a
possibility. Those anti-atoms can live for fraction of seconds before
meeting the material body of our world and burn into the
annihilation. These anti-atoms are natural regularity of their own
world.
------
Some Chemistry: Artificial Elements, Anti-matter,
Artificial Atoms (3):
The third kind of elements I discuss are the
artificial atoms. Now these never happen or occur in nature. Not that
they are very unstable and annihilate soon after their creation but
also that they are impossible to exist in nature. Briefly, an atom in
our world is a positive charge surrounded and encircled by an equal
amount of negative charges. The centre material is very dense and
very heavy comparing with the encircling entity which is very light
and some how in a considerable distance whirling round the centre. In
the simplest form, hydrogen is one heavy positive charge, called a
proton surrounded by one electron of equal negative charge. This has
specific chemical behaviour that causes it to be in a specific place
of its own in the table of elements. This is a natural atom. Equally
in the anti mater world we have an anti-atom of a negative charged
centre encircled by a positive electrons. This one is also a natural
creation in its own world. Now, people have been successful to create
endless streams of positively charged electrons (that is,
anti-electrons of anti-matter world). If they slow down this stream
of positive electrons to a certain speed they can capture negative
electrons of our world to encircle the positive electrons as if the
negative electrons have mistaken them with the centre of hydrogen.
These two, positive electron in centre and negative electron
encircling and turning around it, create an artificial atom that
behaves just like a hydrogen in its chemical properties, although the
centre is not heavy like the centre of hydrogen. But in having a
positive charge it is completely like the hydrogen centre. This
artificial atom does not belong to any conceived world. Well, they
are very short living comparing with any life span in this world, but
people could investigate that whatever you can do chemically with
hydrogen you can do with this atom which is called "positronium."
(Scientists call a positive-charge electron a positron and frequently
call a negative-charge electron a negatron.) Some say that it should
go to the same place as hydrogen goes and they are both co-occupant
of the same box in the table of elements. It is, though, eighteen
hundred times lighter than a hydrogen atom. One might appreciate that
both negative electrons of our world and the positive electron of
anti-matter world are normality of two world that might make a short
living system for a fraction of a second. More amazing than this
artificial atom is another artificial atom called muonium. Muon is a
positive charged particle. It is two hundred times heavier an
electron, still it is nine times lighter than a proton at centre of
hydrogen. It is completely like a positive electron as if fatter and
heavier. This exists in radiation that days and nights showers from
the sky. People can create it in machines called particle
accelerators. Again, if one of this becomes slow enough, it can
capture an electron and makes the electron to circle and turn around
it and becomes something like hydrogen; a positive center and a
negative orbit. But muonium is nine times lighter than a hydrogen
atom. This artificial atom can exist for fractions of a second but
enough to be studied like a chemical element with all properties of
an hydrogen. For example hydronium is a water with an additional
hydrogen. You can replace that additional hydrogen with a muonium and
investigate its properties. It is very interesting we can have
anti-muonium, with a negative charged muon in centre and positive
electron in orbit. We can have mu-muonium, a positive muon in centre
and a negative muon in orbit instead of electron. When there is a
phenomenon, then there is a range of similar phenomena waiting to be
discovered. And still, we have mesonic atoms. In this type we have an
ordinary chemical element with one or many electrons turning round a
heavy centre. One electron might be replaced by a negative muon. That
atom still shows its characteristic chemical properties as before, in
spite of the fact that a fat negative muon of two hundred times
heavier has sit in place of one of its orbiting electrons.
------
Then What?
I talked about some phenomena that modern human
has beheld. Among all of them I find the idea of "muonium"
most useful for my objective. It appears in the world of atoms and
molecules in a short time. When it goes into that society, into
aggregate of hydrogens working inside the chemicals, none of them
hydrogen or others recognize IT as a strange phenomenon, as something
that does not belong to world of elements. IT becomes co-occupant
with hydrogen in the same box. IT looks as if IT is a hydrogen.
Nobody recognize IT as stranger. IT is not a bad thing in ordinary
definition of bad. IT is not good. It is not useless. IT is not
useful. The essence of the truth is that that IT just does not belong
to the world of elements. IT is a look-alike. No world is conceived
of being built out of Muoniums. There is no such a goal or such a
capacity in muonium to exist and IT is of no help for other elements
in achieving such a goal. IT has something, an electron of our world,
in ITs outer shell that confuses the other elements. But in the core
it is a muonium. IT is not a proton to fuel, to taste and to flourish
the existence of the universe. IT is just a flare of a moment, a
sparkle of a fire work that attracts the eyes of children. I used the
capital letters and pronoun "IT" for the muonium to pave
the way for future use of this as an unstable hypothetical element. I
also might use that with a bracket, "[IT]" in fashion of
chemistry for radicals in a reaction.
------
Future of Human Beings: Version One:
Hundred billion years ago there was a whim but
there was not a world
Ten billion years ago there was a universe but
there was not the Earth
One billion years ago there was the earth but
nobody was walking there
Hundred million years ago there was something
walking there but it was not an ape
Ten million years ago there was an ape but it was
not a man
One million years ago there was a man but he had
not fire.
Hundred thousand years ago there was a fire but
there was not a village
Ten thousands years ago there was a village but
there was not a book
Thousand years ago there was a book but nobody
could fly
Hundred years ago they could fly but not to the
moon
Ten years ago they went to moon but not to the
Mars
Now they can go to Mars but they have not enough
money
After ten years they’ll have money but not for
every one
After hundred years everyone goes there but they
whim to put Jupiter ablaze
After thousand years they put Jupiter ablaze but
they cannot move the sun
After ten thousand years they do it then they like
to move the galaxy
After hundred thousand years they move the Milky
Way but remains the remaining of the universe
After a million years they engineer the whole
universe but they want to conquer the time
After ten million years they conquer the time and
the space but they cannot push them to one point
After hundred million years they can push them to
one point but they do not know what else they want
After a billion years they know what they want: a
whim.
After hundred billion years they’ll have that
whim
So they'll create me
And with that, the universe.
I become the father of God.
------
Future of Human Beings: Version Two:
At these days, it is possible that if some one's
heart becomes very ill, they replace it for him if a donor heart can
be found. What is bad about it? Nothing! It makes your life longer.
Well, it has not details of the original heart. For example you do
not enjoy exercise. You do not have blood pressure and feedback to
your mind in that sense. Exercise is the fight with death. You
already had lost that fight. It is better, notwithstanding, than
being all dead. But don’t worry Herr Sinclair1. Sooner or later
they will be able to clone your heart with all of its nerves
in-place. They put a seed there and it grows into your genetically
natural heart. They'll do it though it takes one hundred years from
now. You do not believe? In nineteen oh six, university professors of
fluid dynamics were teaching their students that if a train gets a
speed more than one hundred and forty miles (200 Kilometres per hour)
the air inside the wagons would vacuum out and nobody survives.
Therefore they believed no machine could fly due to the fact that it
should accelerate to two hundred kilometres per hour and air being
vacuumed kills any passenger. Now it has passed one hundred years and
millions are flying everyday without any suffocation. They are going
to do that ‘in-place’ and 'fast' cloning with other parts of your
body, too, if you are damaging them or if they become old and
dysfunction. What if your head explodes on your way to holiday on
Mars? Then you are beyond economic repair. Happily a solution exists.
From the time that you are born from the incubator (nobody will toil
to become pregnant in those days) a small chip transmits, uploads,
all your moment-by-moment experience of life to a secure centre to be
kept on a yotta-byte sim-card. The uploaded information includes,
among other things, details of all biochemistry of your body
(emotions) at any moment of your life. That sim-card, then, is ‘you’!
If something happens to your brain, they clone all of ‘you’ and
download your ‘you’ from your sim-card to your brain and you
restart (reboot) from the moment after brain death. You even have the
experience of the moment of that accident, beyond the point of death.
Well, they do it say in one thousand year from now, but they'll do
it. Then why do you need any ‘body’ at all?
You can remain a sim-card forever and inside that
'you' can create books and planets and galaxies and population and
friends and get energy from sunshine and live forever. You can create
images of sim-cards who like caricatures believe that they exist and
can walk and have philosophical minds, and while they are just
passing of humble photonic pulses (or what I may call it in future)
inside your sim-card, they figure out big pictures about creation and
aims of their supposed universe. How they can wake up from that
horror, from their nightmare?
==================================
foot note: 1. Herr Sinclair, by
Hermann Hesse
-------------------------
Conversion of Faith:
I discussed many sound scientific ideas, so far,
to show that my claim for existence of Messiah in nature, similar to
other phenomena, is within the reach of investigation of ordinary
humans. Although, I reiterate that believing it, at the end, is a
matter of conversion. This conversion can be seen in every aspect of
scientific and daily life. For example, you have seen that repeatedly
you want to prove a fact for your colleague, for your spouse, for
your students and children. They do not accept it from you. This is
the nature of human (and other beings) for protection of integrity of
its individuals. Overweight people do not accept your advice. Smokers
do not accept your advice. People of high blood pressure do not
commit them to a diet. All these happen in face of scientifically
proven and globally observable facts. Suddenly, one smoker quits and
never comes back to smoking. One overweight becomes slim. The
seriousness of some of these facts is a matter of life and death, a
matter of better life and more miserable life. Still, only a
conversion of faith can help the victim to accept the scientific
propositions involved. All the time human finds the devil easier to
follow than what is good for him. Human is not rational. That
irrationality is part of his nature to sustain his existence against
unpredictable and random adversaries. If human was rational then his
blue print and pattern of life would become revealed for his
adversaries, the destructive forces of nature, and they could foil
human plans for survival. Human and other animals are like guerrillas
fighting deep inside the enemies territories. They should not carry
any identification, weapon or anything that makes their enemies
suspicious. If suddenly an engagement with enemy patrols occurred
they should be able to use any improvised idea against it. This is
partly physical, partly spiritual and partly definable in terms of
"information." For example, language or dance in humans are
such weapons. I used the term spiritual. It has my own meaning here.
By that I do not mean preaching anything you already familiar with.
------
Superstitious?
People have become scientific minded these days.
They say, the idea of Messiah is fanaticism, superstition and
something belonged to past times when people could not solve the
problems of nature and had to attribute them to one or more super
beings. Although all of these propositions are easily subject to
challenge, I have tried not to become engaged with them until I feel
that the backgrounds and foundations are built enough. So far, I have
not said anything that could be in contradiction to any scientific
achievements of human. In contrast, I have refuted, doubted and
rejected any previous idea regarding this phenomenon, Messiah, as it
is taught mostly by religions.On the other hand, I do not say that
such an idea, the Messiah is weird and rejected. By no means it is
so. Almost more than ninety five percent of humans deeply believe in
a way or other way in such phenomenon among them very great living
and deceased scientists. Many people, earn money by publishing books
and gathering people and associations and organizations, even armies
and fans around them, selling this idea to masses and masses of
humans. Notwithstanding, they are in the first line of defence
together with sacrilegious groups if such a person with all correct
descriptions attributed to him emerges in front of their face.
------
How Much Knowledge?
So far, hence, I put my self in front line of
scientific thinking in campaigning with all superstitions already
advertised by all religions regarding the "Messiah." In
doing so I cannot eliminate further counter claims of scientifically
minded modern humans. How? For the first, because not all my readers
who believe they are scientific minded are so as they assert. These
are one group: assume that you are an atheist young student of
engineering, then I assert that one cannot measure the position and
velocity of a particle at the same time without sacrificing the
precision of one quantity in favour of the second quantity. I further
assert that it is inherent of nature; nature blocks your measurement
not your skill, knowledge and tools. As my young atheist is not
familiar with "Quantum Mechanics" and only he has got some
familiarity with classical mechanics he might vilify me as saying a
non-scientific proposition. Then he does not continue listening to me
rejecting everything as a whole erroneous package of frequently told
and falsified dogmas of the antiquity. The second group could be time
tasted person of some cultivation and education such as an artist, a
physician, a journalist who has another dogma wrongly and in a
scrambled shape resided in his mind such as "Galileo Galilei
proved that there was no God and any angel by looking into a
telescope and for this reason burnt at steak by the order of
Inquisition!" They also do not listen any further to me. Another
group does not come to the frontiers of human unknown for discovery.
I cannot drag them to that place. There is another group who
recognises the humble predicaments of vague origin as the scientific
truth. One example of that I could find in a TV commercial that,
"such a cream can eliminate the wrinkles of your face skin!"
Then it was based on the idea of eighty persons who used that cream.
A very important group I have found are those who
seek "Messiah" as the embodiment of their ancient prophet.
That could be true but needs and waits for your investigation to
prove or reject.
------
Overcoming the Other Loud Voices:
Not all the campaign is with the scientific minds.
It contains less than ten percent of the effort. There are more
powerful sectors of the society to fight the idea of "Messiah"
resurrection. Most of them are from previous religions. Many have a
legacy of religion in their minds without practicing a religion or
without being sacrilegious or atheist. If they are asked they claim
themselves as, say, a Christian. Sometimes they say that their
parents were belonged to such and such religion but they only believe
in God or a super gracious being as the God. Many are deeply drenched
in superstitions rather than being religious and normally the
boundary between two is vague and blurred for them. There are fights
inside them that which is the orthodoxy of religion and which are the
superstitions from ancient stories and paganism among them. For a
scientific minded atheist there is no difference between religion and
superstition but inside the doctrine of religion such a boundary
exist and is the subject of much controversy. For example, a monist
theologian might become philosophically sceptical of the existence of
the material world based on the idea that the Almighty abstract God
why needs a material world to exist and how matter might emanate from
the all abstract mind of God. Then he knows conceiving of the God as
an old man on a throne a superstition of commoner masses and a
blasphemy if that idea proposed by an educated priest. All the
existing religions are based on the idea that their religion is the
most perfect and ultimate instruction of God and they have a
scientific positivist kind of reason for that as that after their
prophet or messenger human beings have entered in a phase of being
mature and grown up enough such that no further direct contact of
human with the God is necessary anymore. Only if a bad happens to the
faith it is because the followers do not carefully follow the rules
as originally advertised by the God and their messenger and are
written in their scripts. And, they assume, if they do that they can
overcome to other religions and blasphemies and injustice that has
gripped the earth.
------
Disappointed?
For the reasons I wrote in previous post, people
searching to know about "Messiah" when they come here or to
the Messiah website become disappointed of not finding what they
want. They want Messiah follow them in their religions and their
desires. They wrongly believe Messiah is something as their private
asset to help them to fight with the rival local church or to a rival
religion. They believe Messiah should repair their Mosques and
temples and start a war with infidels and He should side for a group.
We know Jesus Christ said that He belonged to all humanity even those
who committed atrocity to him. One can deprive himself from Messiah
but Messiah cannot deprive Him from the others. If Messiah is the
peace and justice crystallised in form of human how could he be
property of a certain faith or certain aggregate of people. That fact
is true for Abraham, and Moses and Muhammad and Buddha and Zoroaster,
too. They belong to all humanity. They all were the same element cast
in different times. Where they are there is no time passing by so
they are only one. No time passing Him by; He passes by the time.
They pass by the time, seen to the eyes of humans as different
people. All came to humans to suffer and to show to human that Satan,
is their enemies. Ahriman can exist and can be seen by material eyes
in the material form and every time Antichrist cheats the human again
with the same trick and human repeats the original sin, as if no
lesson has learned and then Messiah pays for the sin of man with
suffering anew and save the humanity towards eternity, towards
eternal existence towards "coming here to stay!"
------
What is Anti-Christ?
That helps me to explain further what Satan could
be. Messiah is not busy fighting Satan like a normal usual fight with
goals ascribed to other affairs of humans. If it was that should not
be categorised as something supernatural. That would be included into
other famous entities and would be remembered in the same way.
Messiah should have a unique mission and position not volunteered by
other individuals. The position already offered to heavens, to earth
to mountains and all rejected to accept. It should be the lowest so
that all humans loath to accept. Should be the most difficult such
that no other human can achieve to fulfil. See, Julius Caesar was
living around the time of Jesus Christ. He has no attribution to us,
people who are living right now. Everything around him are like him.
They are not of significance to us let alone die or live for them. He
was a political military leader with extreme capacity of a conqueror;
a general, a statesman with power over a big part of earth that even
in present time is almost impossible to rule in unification without
dispute. All the time try to compare him with Jesus Christ with his
donkey, his worn out robe with humble voice and demeanour. Well, you
say statesmen and political and military leaders with any capacity
cannot project them on a long history of humans. Everybody whether on
the side of Jesus or against him approve this assertion. So this
excludes Jesus Christ long standing position among humans due to he
being a political leader. That also excludes the idea that He had
been any type of rebellion or revolutionary leader since that
capacity belongs to a man who is on the path to become a statesman or
a general or a conqueror, like Julius Caesar, but perhaps with a bit
more agreeable slogans. We do not know any instance of a rebellion
leader who ever had come to lead the mind of humans for long enough
time to rival the position of Jesus Christ. But we keep such an idea
for further examinations. We compare a rebel with Jesus Christ to
ratify appropriateness of that leader as a just leader. But,
conversely, we never compare Jesus Christ with a rebel leader to
ratify capacities of Jesus Christ. People follow Jesus not for his
art of planing a rebel. There are certain zealots of religions who
try to attribute such art to Jesus. That more happens in followers of
Muhammad and Moses since these two messengers of god had to show some
political leadership in certain part of their lives. Similarly, for
Jesus we saw that he needed food and sleeping, and He said that he
had an earthly material being as he appeared among the sons of man.
We should separate these two parts and we are doing this.
------
What is Anti-Christ? (2)
Therefore, we excluded Messiah of being a
political leader, a rebellion, a general. No other occupation or
extraordinary talent you might attribute to Messiah. One never says
that Messiah is a great athlete, or a great violinist. The great
violinist becomes a great violinist. A great athlete becomes a great
athlete. Spartacus, the gladiator of Rebelled near the time of Jesus
Christ who had many great characteristics and cruelly crucified was a
great athlete and suffered what you might believe similar to Jesus
Christ, but he only is remembered where you might remember Jesus
Christ good messages and not by his own.
***
People might say that Jesus Christ was a great
orator or a great philosopher. Around the time of Jesus Christ there
were living very great orators such as Cicero, speaking in the mother
tongue of Romans, great philosophers like Plotinus with deep
understanding of God as an abstract entity in creation of the world.
Ideas advertised by Jesus, or old testament, or Muhammad looks humble
comparing with them. Do you know how great are Plato, and Aristotle,
even in our modern philosophy? They were recognised already by the
learned people of the time as having a sound position why Jesus
Christ should be preferred who was companion of vagabonds and centre
of attention of illiterate people. Learned people of temple did not
argue with Jesus. They knew him of no intellectual value to argue
with him in a valid way. This much was attitude of his own people,
let alone Romans who were ruling half of the world and constantly
were in conflict with rebels and native ideas behind those rebels.
Frequently, they had to send big armies and finest generals and
warriors and great amounts of bribes for opposing chieftains and
warlords to settle such conflicts. They just did not consider to talk
with Jesus for a second. They sent a couple of illiterate villain
soldiers to finish whatever was the cause of the buzz. With no
ordinary reason you never know why each one of you hangs a cross of
Jesus, or a star of David on his neck or blows himself for the name
of Muhammad, but name of Plotinus is hidden in few books in dusty
libraries. Do you believe ideas of Marx with all greatness with all
compassion that exists in them, with all mobilization that they have
given to minds and hearts of modern man will endure a century from
now? What is in their names, Jesus, Moses, Muhammad, Buddha that does
not exist in Marx, Hegel, Plotinus, Plato, and Aristotle?
------
Before continuing, I must answer a question that
might arise. Why am I speaking about Christ while the title is, "What
is Anti-Christ?" It is because Anti-Christ is the shadow of
darkness. It is a blank in a dark background that finds existence as
a parasite to emergence of Christ in the material world. When I know
what a Messiah is then the road is paved to acknowledge what
Anti-Christ is.
***
People attribute miracles to Jesus or Moses or
Muhammad. For instance, Jesus walked on water without submersion in
the water. Assume some one comes to you, as a modern human, and tells
you that he can walk on water and shows it to you. What happens to
you, then? You know illusionists, do not you? People give them money
and fame and comfort and applaud for what that people know only as a
trick. Do you go and crucify illusionist. Do illusionists advertise
any thing other than their jobs. Do they insist to the death that
they are something else. What about in ancient time, the time of
Jesus Christ? There were illusionists with their own tricks in those
times, too. They also had status similar to modern ones in their
societies. Sometimes they had claims of being something else. Their
difference with Jesus Christ was that they were conforming to money,
fame and applaud. Nobody can remember them later. If somebody without
any illusion or trick genuinely can walk on the water an upheaval
happens in the society. How people can remain indifferent, after
that? Jesus Christ converted water to wine. He was from a tribe who
were famous as good investors. How then they left him to be crucified
in loneliness while he could convert cheap water to high quality
wine? He did those miracles only once to show that he was genuinely
the Son of the God; you might say. Well, he could arrange sessions
for different groups of people, for people from the Temple, for
Romans for different groups until news become accepted by everybody
or by the most people that he was really the promised one. Then what
was his mission? People would accept after those sessions that He was
genuine. Now what should they do? What requirements should be
fulfilled? What then? Should they go and do prayer day and night?
Should they close the doors to themselves and dedicate themselves to
God? Should they mobilise for a war. Do they need anything to do for
bread for sustenance. Or Jesus Christ should provide for them similar
to story of one bread for five thousands people. Muslims believe that
Messiah (Mahdi) comes and opens the gold mines for them. It seems
tests that humans put forward for being a Godly entity is more
difficult to pass than tests that God puts forward for human
salvation. For few dollars an hour people commit themselves to most
dangerous jobs such as being a soldier in a war zone then what
happens if some one comes and opens gold mines for them. Who might
crucify such a benefactor? People rush and kiss the soil that he
steps on.
------
I already fully elaborated on the idea of a
spectrum for natural phenomena. You observe something weak here then
definitely you find its full-fledged happening somewhere else. You
see this happens in a small scale then that can happen in a very
large scale. I said, sometimes when you cannot find the whole
spectrum in nature then human can create it artificially. Messiah and
anti-Christ are also extreme of a phenomenon in nature that on a
daily basis at any moment a human can experience in its mild and
milder and mildest forms within him and without in the society. to
further preparation man should refer to his "mind." Mind of
a human is the most complex and end product of the nature. Well, I do
not mean the "brain." Brain of very advanced primate is
also somehow extreme of creation of nature. Sometimes, one might be
deluded, when reading about black holes and quarks and gluon's and
these things that what surprises they have and you might forget that
the surprise is not into basic very crude and primitive objects of
nature. The surprise exists in the tool that observe, study and
analyse them; not the brain, the human mind. Before going further one
could be too stiff in protesting that there is only brain and talking
of mind means that I want to bridge the gap and jump into the world
of metaphysics and leave the physics behind. I might do it but in
future. For now, I am using only physics. We have two sets and one
function from one to the other. One is nature and the other is the
result of action of physical brain on the nature. Brain is the
function. Result or in mathematical term, "image" of this
function is mind. You might say its arrangement of molecules. Well,
saying that is mind not the brain. Your mind says that not your
brain. Why is it physics. We should go back to the entities who are
here to stay. First we could find was proton. It emerged from the
creation as an entity that does not "want" to decay except
that you force it. Then we noticed crystals. They want to stack and
fill the space in spite of the fact that they have to swim upstream.
"Then we had RNA who wants to stay by creating a replica of
himself. He believes if he needs himself when he is decaying then he
is there by presence of the replica," said so Messiah when he
was asked why we multiply. I called those surprising objects basic
since RNA already was there and could not find them enough to stay at
those stages and evolved and evolved until he created the paradise,
the blue warm, wet friendly cradle for its creation. Then he, i mean
RNA, created water, methane, more complex chemicals. When everything
was ready RNA was there. Then as he had aimed he started to put one
back for him at each point on the earth. "I am everywhere and
always here. Look, I am here. No, look at me I am here, no..heeere!"
Then enemy could not decide which one is the original which one
should be annihilated. Perhaps there is a mirror shattered in pieces
and each is the beautiful face of Him, the RNA? Enemy, the
annihilator who presses the blue from the above and from the below
remains wandering in search of him forever. Shattered pieces of
mirror carry the same and one thing. Each show the same face and when
you put the jigsaw of the broken pieces together they show the same
thing, an RNA who is here to stay. Those pieces are our minds and
they are parts of our global mind. They are attached in unification
but their projections into our local time space seems separated and
enemy is wandering forever to annihilate them. The enemy is one who
has not that picture. So he is in search of that picture. Leave this
sweet fable. Wake up back to the physics such that in a dialectic of
physics and "non-"physics start to believe that you are
here to stay. You know that how proton is so stable and how RNA
created as a replicator. If you do not know and you are interested
you can go to school and learn it. Here you learned "why."
Therefore we negotiated that there is our mind as the result of
evolution. We add that we have evolved drastically from a time-space
localisations of some primitive magma of energy into the protons and
we passed crucibles after crucibles until RNA and then fights and
survivals into the shape of a human. You know how we started to walk
on our hind legs until we had to twist our face ninety degrees
downwards to be able to see front of us instead watching the sky.
See, in each stage, at each mile stone with the big gap that exist
between them a transformation happens. The universe of that entity
changes. He leaves a universe behind him. Proton never decays, RNA
lays many of him everywhere. It is natural that we extrapolate for
another surprise. That surprise does not exist somewhere else that we
start to create tools and labs to discover it. That is continuation
of our existence. We are at the head of the arrow and we are going
towards it, knowing or not knowing.
------
Still, there were arguments that mind is the same
as brain. Rearrangements of molecules in their ultimate happens in
the material brain. It is as you say proton is just concentration of
energy. You say that, it is just three quarks attached to each other.
That kind of reasoning means that you even do not believe that there
is such thing as brain. RNA is just an aggregate of hydrogen carbon
nitrogen and oxygen with few other elements. We might left in a
hollow of "nihil." Then there is the "good news"
that you cannot reason for "nihil." You hear the good news
and you cannot ignore it because you have a mind that recognizes it
without you can help it. And that holy creature, "mind"
also reasons to keep you integrated in favour of a controversy, as,
"there is only nihil." Hence, reasoning for "nihil"
is equivalent to reasoning for mind. Good news is that you exist
in-spite of your reasoning against it. You can keep your "cool
status" while at the same time you are enjoying secretively as a
member of "boring kids club" of those who are here to stay.
Proton knows that it is a new entity. It is not concentration of
energy. It is equivalent (please calculate it using physics of high
school)to myriads units of energy of sunshine shining to myriads
square kilo-meters of empty space but gathered in the smallest
possible volume to create next stages of existence. Proton knows that
it refuges other wandering entities (electrons) and decaying entities
(neutrons), whom without him will not have any role in the nature, in
a safe haven of a family which is the first stone of the foundation
of higher stages of beingness in nature. He cannot ignore such a good
news by reasoning that he is just another name for arrangement of
three quarks.
------
Usually, I have read many ideas about "Ahriman"
or Satan, other names for and the same entity as "Anti-Christ."
They attribute such entity to a political character, sometimes to
very cunning rich people, or to criminals. Such characters, if bad,
or even worst of them are bad in the context of ordinary human
experience. Their actions could be satanic but they are not Satan.
Satan is a cosmological phenomenon. He, if we can use this pronoun
for It, cannot commit itself to such engagements. That things is not
here to become rich or famous or rule over the material world. It has
a mission, as the enemy of humans, to eradicate the humanity. Not
that to replace of something by bad things, but to substitute
nothingness in place of beingness. He is enemy (of Messiah) by its
nature and should concentrate all its activity towards fighting with
Messiah. If It goes to politics, or acquiring wealth and power then
people would become partitioned towards him as enemies or as friends.
Then he would not be able to mobilize all the people but few, perhaps
only one person left on the side of Messiah, as its mission is such a
mobilisation. It is not the case that there is an Armageddon of usual
armies to decide who wins who forfeit. Satan is extreme of slyness
and treachery. When it becomes incarnated he can cheat "everybody"
towards his chicanery. You have heard from teachings of religions
that when God created man, all angels prostrated to submission to man
but Satan, who said that it remains enemy to the man to the end. So
Satan does not come to earth to buy and sell things or ask people to
vote to him. He is friend with none. How such thing can happens in
the material world. How can you find something who looks like a human
and can communicate with humans (to urge them against Messiah) but do
not engage in daily affairs of human. What power and specification it
has that it can conduct such an Armageddon against the one man army
of Messiah.
------
If people become partitioned towards Antichrist
then they'll become partitioned towards Messiah. Then it changes to a
fair game of humans not something beyond affairs of daily life. Part
of suffering of Messiah and all the prophets is that they become left
lonely and without being believed and mocked at. They should not
share their visions with groups of people, as they could not. We said
that people should accept this phenomenon as a conversion of faith
not by evidences and proofs but by hints and road maps. Perhaps you
have heard or are familiar with the Socrates' notion of dialectic.
One should annihilate all attributes that make a phenomenon shared,
and owns in common with other phenomena until at the end of
annihilation one gets to that phenomenon that he is studying with all
its pureness and carved out of its background, solid and existing and
tangible in front of him, until he become sure that that phenomenon
actually exists in its reality, all sparkling and shining and eye
dazzling and all beingness. At the beginning you believe that you are
killing that phenomenon by denying everything for him, but at the end
it comes out more alive for you than anything else. If Messiah stays
longer among us, he is describing prophets, Jesus, Muhammad, Moses,
Abraham in a new way for modern human. For the faithful of those
religions, at first it might come heavy to accept but then they
appreciate that if those people have had something related to all the
creation then believing them as philosophers, orators, physicians,
shrewd merchant, converter of water to wine or to blood is actually
degrading them to ordinary humans with similar interests. All of them
were face to face to Antichrist, to that carrier of the most profane.
It is not that Antichrist was only at the time of Jesus Christ. That
entity is part of the mission of all messengers of god, including
Buddha and Zoroaster.
------
Hence, proton only stays but RNA stays and
replicates. He builds him times and times again. He is one step
upper. Man stays and replicates and "knows" that there
should be one step upper than RNA. Proton has a doubt that he can
stay so joggles all the time its constituents to become sure. RNA has
doubt that it can stays and it actually has one of himself
-replicated- in a corner. Hence it replicates and replicates. Man
joggles with his mind all the time to quench the thirst of doubt he
has got about being a mind. We know that there are myriad of stages
between being a proton and being an RNA. There are myriads of stages
between being an RNA and being a man. But those stages are not sharp
enough to help to define a special position for them. We know there
are groups of people who interpret world scientifically to deduce
existence of God from those interpretations. For instance, they say
there should come together say sixty or seventy factors to make the
creation of life on earth possible. Say in solar system earth should
be in a narrowly defined distance from the Sun and from the Jupiter
and should have a moon of this size, pattern of radiation of the Sun,
iron core of the earth, spatial coordination of carbon orbitals,
polarity of water molecule and its amazing angle (between hydrogen
bonds). Yes, I admit that it is fascinating but in terms of
understanding of beyond they are not more amazing than this: How can
you become millionaire in a night in a casino? Assume you shuffle
cards and the outcome of the shuffling be a straight flush for you.
Are you a winner, guaranteed? Definitely, no; since you are a winner
if at least one opponent has got a hand near to yours to multiply the
table "pot." Best is that you shuffle in a way that
everybody has got a good hand. Normally in the next round you lose
all you have earned except that the same pattern of hands happens to
you. If you win quite a few hands, some large size but otherwise
polite employees of the casino inform you that you look too tired out
to be allowed to remain in casino just due to their concern for your
health. Hence, what is the likeliness that shuffling of brand new
cards becomes tandem together for you and your opponents and with a
fair casino who let you win all through the night? Now, try to figure
out the likeliness of the next story. There are rare fluctuations in
nature that break all the laws of nature based on pure statistics.
For example, it can cause half of the water in the glass in front of
you boils and the other half becomes frozen as the expense for
boiling the other half. This is against the laws of thermodynamics,
but it is probable. Any thermodynamic event can have such a free paid
casino winning. What is the odd that you can take on a jet-liner and
it takes you to your destination by such a gamble wining process?
Having said that, there are fluctuations that can happen in a very
remote future of the world even after all the black holes who
devoured all the galaxies then, they themselves become evaporated and
all the most stable nucleon of irons (which are even more stable than
black holes) become evaporated and the universe turns to an amorphous
uniform, almost in zero degree Kelvin, magma of "leptons"
those fluctuations can act against the odds and do the impossible and
create a world. The first hand is not a winner. Needs another
fluctuation. The second hand is winner but has not good hands for
opponents. It shuffles and serves hands until a tandem of shuffles
and servings set you behind a computer but without a nose so the
world collapse to another round of shuffling until everything is at
their right and correct places as this moment. Next round of shuffles
should sustain the physical laws of the universe to prevent its
collapse back to an unknown situation. Why this story is probable but
your casino night is not? It is because if you want to win in that
way in the casino you should own all the money of the world and the
night should be as long as a million nights. That amorphous magma has
all the necessary materials and a time to infinity so it can shuffle
and serve until it wins. As if children are playing with fake money
and show their cards to their opponents when they feel pity for him.
I told this story to say that those groups with their rare
fascinating sixty seventy factors of life cannot over-power a serious
atheist equipped with story of fluctuations. If you do that you are
continuing to admit your ignorance. You have to retire your
proposition until the next discovery amaze you. You cannot prove
anything. Still, if you are a preacher of a religion you might decide
that those amazing findings might help your audience to juggle with
their minds to discover, what they can discover, alone into a
conversion and transcend of their minds towards higher tiers of
evolution.
------
They teach to children that during the Moses' time
witches and their witchcraft were the most important feat one could
achieve. During the Jesus' era medicine was considered the prodigy to
follow. During Muhammad's time and place creating literature was what
one should show to gain the attention of public. Perhaps you might
think that I have selected psychoanalysis as people of our time are
infatuated with that kind of rhetoric to be compelled to follow. In
all of those childish catechisms you are wrong. It is the idea of
preachers who believe these historical figures are extraordinary
humans or demi-gods with perfections in talents of humans as the
winners of some Olympiad games. I heard from one follower of Muhammad
that formula for solving the quartic equations could be extracted
from their holly book. He was familiar only with a high school basic
algebra and that problem seemed very difficult for him. I have had a
look at the holly books of Abraham's descendants including Muhammad
and also at the holly books of Buddhists and Zoroastrians. There is
nothing about witchcraft or medicine or literature or equations in
them. You can exhaust all of them in one sentences: God is gracious
and human has an enemy in a corner that is so easily can be seen but
even god cannot over-power it. That was all. That entity, called
Satan, wages a war against the God on the excuse of the "mistake"
of god in creation of human. It knows that the God exists; in
certitude, not like humans in all the time doubt. It knows that the
God is almighty and omnipotent. It KNOWS. But in the face of god, It
rebels. Modern humans, in spite of accepting the idea of god among
ninety-five percent of them, if asked about their belief, become
perplexed admitting such trivial contradicting story. Satan declares
war against god but god has no asset to be violated but His humble
creature, the man. (My Christian friend, now do you understand why
Christ is the son of the Lord?) Such a vast universe is of no value
for invasion of Satan except a feeble couple that god has created as
His only sign of power. The amazing quad-polar neutron star was not
enough for God to appreciate His own power. God could only be
satisfied if a human discovers that. Hmm? Hence, Satan an angel in a
corner unknown to god came out of its amorphous background he had
among other angels at the same time that man was created. After
finishing delivering Its ultimatum to god it sneaks into the
Paradise, the honey moon resort god booked for the newly coupled, to
corrupt the man and his wife.
------
Hence, god made a "mistake" who created
man and Satan rebelled. Then why religions are obsessed with the
original sin of the man? Because it is wrongly understood.
Satan appears in the arena at the same point that man appears on the
stage. Satan is interwoven with human. Son of the God should pay back
for the original sin of man. But it is supposed that the Son is a
different entity from the man and He should pay for him. God
sacrifices His own Son for the sin of man. Already Abraham should
sacrifice his son for a promise to God. God had asked him to do such
a sacrifice. But later god sent the angel to inform Abraham that it
had been just a test of his faith and obedience towards the god. We
are on the track of discovery of an old, an ancient story but
otherwise a wisdom, a wisdom of the past by putting pieces of time
tormented puzzle together. We have to figure out what could be the
parts that we have not found but actually existed at the dawn of
human civilisation in its recent and more sophisticated form. What
man saw at that time that he recorded in this way, and it is full of
inspiration for all humans on the earth through the history. Why so
many passionate heads climb voluntarily on the gallows of history to
defend different forms of this story without asking a reward and they
become the most admired characters remaining on the hearts of humans
century after century. Messiah says, "There is no original sin
committed by man. It is 'mistake' of god in creation of man that has
been interpreted wrongly as the sin of man." When you cut a
piece of marble from the mountain to create a statue its empty place
remains as a sin in the mountain; by chiseling out each piece that
sin becomes greater. Your sin remains in the form of geometry of the
created piece to the end of time. Your sin accompanies the beauty of
your creation. The hollow in the mountain screams to take your
creation back and that hollow remains there as a wound. They both
appear at the same point and intertwine together. The hollow seduce
the beauty all the time and frighten him of going back to
shapelessness that he had. RNA comes into the world not by the fear
of hunger but by the fear that it has not a backup in the world if he
suffers annihilation. Hence he creates himself again and again. He
takes chemicals from the world and leaves hollow in their place. He
weaves them like the most perfect artist, perfect with the whole
meaning of the perfection. He weaves them with not even a slightest
difference into his own form, by watching his beautiful face in the
mirror of space-time and puts them in a corner of the gallery. This
exhibition gallery is full of similar artworks, in shape, form and
colors and shadings, but in the eyes of beholder who is the only
lonely guest there, all are consummate of artifacts; all are
masterpieces in splendour. Up is freezing cold and lacking the
chemicals for the sculptor. Down is hot and molten. He occupies
diligently, all that is possible to occupy, to the deepest down and
to the highest up and extends the dominion of his creation. He is
here to stay.
------
Psychoanalysis is a human achievement and
supposedly is very materialistic and takes god from the arena of
human life and knows other factors affecting human destiny. First, I
said that I am talking with modern human and his modern mind in
modern words. I am empty of any religion. All cults and religions and
ideas existing at this time are part of career of a group of people
and they are not for connection to the God. People who consume those
products might benefit or might use it as some remedies for their
daily pains but at the end they might become confused of inherent
contradictions of those teachings with their modern mind. I already
used some facts and findings of modern mind such as proton and RNA
and muonium to navigate ahead. But I have used the psychoanalyst for
my Blog and my web site names. I use this similarly for navigation
only, until it remains the truth with its shininess. Second, this
word, psychoanalyst, and part of its methods of interpretation of the
human soul have been subjected to abuse by any type of preachers from
its own discipline of psychology to every domain of day to day life
of humans. Normally, I do not mention any name, since I am not
writing any science here to cite names of discoverers and scientists.
As psychoanalysis has huge impact on and blurring boundaries with
religion I have to talk a paragraph about it. I did not write such a
paragraph, say, about proton because people have been so frightened
by modern science to interfere, or doubt about that modern
ecclesiastical. Hence, they take it granted and I could move smoothly
in that part. When it comes to the soul of humans, then everybody has
a firm idea that cannot be disputed and he could abuse words in
expanding anything from any beginning proposition to any ending
proposition. Psychoanalysis established with vast discoveries about
human soul at the beginning of twentieth century similar to modern
physics. Its difference with modern physics was that, after its
founder, it was not guarded by the same zeal as modern physics and it
did not enjoy to be flourished and ramified with equal ingenuity of
minds compareable to the founder of psychoanalysis, similarly. As the
flow of science started to move towards the new world, it soon
married with money and became arena of banality. Media used it to
promote consumption of sex products. Governments and politics used it
to opiate people with a scientific-like reasoning. Preachers and
mushrooming cults used it to preach any idea. It became the language
of generalised non-sense that can be interpreted by the audience
individual suppositions. Until now that, everyday millions of words
are pushed into the minds of humans as the pshychoanalyst insights.
Gradually it is becoming the tool of Satan for corrupting the
language of human, The Words. Humans, making their tower towards the
heaven towards reaching to the God and bringing him down, become
corrupted in the language and they lose communications with each
other ever increasingly.
------
We understood that the only sin is the
creation in an arena that everything is hostile to the creation.
Everything is dying. Everything is destroying to the most delicate of
all: the life. That hostility remains accompanying and chasing,
intriguing the ascending being towards descend and annihilation. It
is a wound, not healing ever, left back. It remains as a whisper in
the ear, in the mind, in the existence of the upwardness of creation.
It looks for a lapse for a wink to overcome and take everything back.
It accumulates more and more when creation soars higher and higher.
That is the pain. It happens that that pain falls on the shoulder of
man with all of its heaviness. It is offered to heavens. It is
offered to mountains. None accept. They say we draw lot whom his name
comes out he carries it. But then they cheat. They write on all the
ballots only one name; only Messiah's name. And when they draw the
lot it comes to Messiah to carry it. It is the cross that Messiah
carries. Son of God, man, sacrifices for the sake of creation. He
tolerate all the pains of the wound that He has created in creation.
He tolerates for the original sin of man - original sin of God -
creation. And Antichrist remains in the back fallen and defeated
again dying and burning in his jealousy of witnessing the creation
and evolving of the human mind.
------
Psychoanalysis, in its original advertisements of
its founder, has touched a vast arena of human rituals and their
relation with some phenomena seen in certain groups of humans,
described as neurosis. Psychoanalysis in its endeavour to discover
that had to investigate remote concepts such as totems, taboos, and
the role of phallus and the role of the primitive ruler and the role
of father in human societies. It explains ideas such as patricide and
regicide and the feeling of guilt. As said ingenuity of the founder
was not followed with an integration of his ideas in a more unified
and honest approach of his advertisers. Do not make a mistake and do
not accuse me that I am knowing him a prophet. Let me clear me. It is
an analogy that I use. He was like a prophet, honestly advertising
his findings as a scientist should, but his followers were like
preachers who advertise a religion as a career to earn a sustenance
of worldly values, some vehemently, some hopelessly, and some with no
appetite at all. I said my talks about this branch of human knowledge
has as much use for me as my talks about proton and RNA. Messiah, is
a defender, but not more than that. Messiah is not follower. Others
are follower. Messiah is the balance and the gauge for others. Others
are connections and nodes to connect to Him: not to connect anything
to him, but to connect He to Him; to connect Man to Man, to connect
the entire existence to existence. In first emergence's of human
societies, we have family: mother, father, children and
grandchildren, ruler, and an entity there: he is the witch, or
medicine man, or something around this concept. There are details.
For instance, father was not there similar to what we then had until
now. Mother was. She was carrying the result of human regeneration
and hence attachment was to her. Father could be anyone.
Psychoanalyst discovered that the male child of human has a hidden
tendency to eliminate his father. (Regretfully, later these novel
ideas fell in the hands of brothel runners.) In place of father there
was the uncle. This uncle was brother of mother. He was the mirror
that could inspire the male child. Look! Pieces of puzzle are here.
Abraham had no father, brought up by his uncle. Generations after
generations people never asked why. But Abraham means father of
people. He established fatherhood. His fatherhood established by many
rituals that needs to be investigated. Moses had no father. You do
not know the story in this way, none of you. His name shows that:
Moses, taken from the water. Jesus had no father. His father was god.
Next and the last one was also known as the "Mohammad the Waif"
These stories later has been modified by the preachers to alter the
life of these greatest unique personalities of humans to become
similar to a spoiled prince or a hero of no value with many similar
entities born everyday in a corner of the Earth.
------
In older posts, I described briefly about some
modern observations in nature of chemical elements. I talked about
anti-matter and artificial elements and nonperceivable elements such
as muoniums. I left out one important case and that is the exciton.
This element is created when nothingness becomes excited! It exists
but in twilight of existence. What is the use of such thing in the
nature. All you see right now in screen of your computer is due to
such existence. Assume you are inviting equal numbers of girls and
boys to a school ball. You expect people become paired when the band
plays a cheek-to-cheek. what happens if a girl or a guy does not get
their invitation card on-time. You are lacking a coupling place; some
one remains alone. If you make the environment excited enough by
changing the music to a more modern rhythm, the lonely person can
snatch his/her couple from a pair and makes the other partner alone.
The left alone individual can do the same with the nearest couple and
this can create an additional observable commotion rippling over the
dancing motions of people. There is an empty place for one missed
individual but it seems as filled by the excitement. You can say one
person is dancing with a bubble, with a "hole!" There is a
couple there created by excitation, compensating the absent
guest.They look as a natural couple similar to others. This "hole"
dancer only is a bit more heavier and sluggish than all other dancers
in turning and bending and other motions. You can create senarios and
by taking snap shots from above the dance floor calculating weight of
this invisible dancer. You can 'inject' a spare partner from opposite
door of the ball room until two single dancers meet up in the centre
of the room, the hole gets filled. Suddenly, all will have their
partners, shout in relaxation and the excitement fades out; many
scenarios, just "gedanken." The couple might win the fruit
basket of the best dancers of the night and the umpire calls the
"exciton couple" as the winner. Remains where is
psychoanalysis in this discussion?
------
First, allow me to discuss exciton in nature. When
you dope some impurity in a semiconductor material, inside the
crystal structure of that material you can create an additional
electron coupled with a lack of electron (a positive hole). They act
like a Hydrogen atom: Hole is a light weight positive charge with a
mass a little more than mass of an electron. You can create many of
these atoms. All modern electronics and lasers and LED's are working
on this basis. There is a hope that you can create such an immense
concentration of Excitons to turn them into a metallic form similar
to metallic hydrogen. (Hydrogen is actually a metal with properties
similar to lithium and sodium, but it shows that under unbelievable
pressure to keep its atom in a metallic structure.) Then there is a
hope that you can increase concentration to degenerate that metal to
a superconductor (similar to super-conducting high temperature
metallic hydrogen ); a superconductor inside a semiconductor. In that
case it is possible to manufacture computer parts that do not need
cooling and can work with a torch battery. They do it, though in
fifty years. Then what is a hole in our ball room party? It does not
exist on the dance floor as far as all dancers are paired. When there
comes an unpaired individual, the dance floor becomes a little
excited due to that presence, but not enough to create an Exciton, as
far as the dance lattice remains stiffed due to a calm music. It
should become excited by applying a more exciting music to the
environment. When an unpaired individual enters then a hole is
created. What is that? It is an effect due to presence of an unpaired
one. It becomes created with speed of infinity (in nature we do not
have speed more than speed of light, but that hole defies that
postulate). It is non-causal: Hole is there before its cause enters
the room. It is not the matter. It is somewhere. It is a spirit. You
know the room is full of holes waiting to grab an unpaired
individual, when excited.
------
I have written frequently that my aim is not to
prove the god and religion by using science. Modern science
and the idea of god and religion as we know them are contradictory. I
said that I do not mean that the idea of god is good for the
psychological benefits of human and giving him comfort and insight
for his daily behaviour or inspire and frighten him towards a better
moral behaviour. Everything that you claim is so vast and vaguely
understood by man that exclude me to commit. It goes into realm of
dedicated scholarships of individuals and groups of people. Why god
sends his son or a messenger who has a very partial knowledge of
human affairs let alone to help them to eternal salvage. Messiah only
brings a news and some people could only believe him and mostly
people could not believe except by conversion, by sudden
transformation of soul. I have shown the contradictory nature of
these two discourse. Hence, what is all that about the excitons and
psychoanalysis? I want to show that there are things that are
conceivable. I want to show that the idea of god and Satan is in the
spectrum of human thoughts without creating a contradiction or using
glib of preachers in bypassing and jumping over the contradiction. I
want to show that if modern science tries in denying my argument it
similarly has to jump and bypass its own contradiction. In this way
I'll be able to demonstrate a unified outlook. Exciton is something
in a spectrum - spectrum of artificial elements - that has been
created in a very unusual conditions. It is part of the nature but
man cannot find it in the nature. On the other hand, I want to show
that an instance of the language has been created by the modern man
that puts locks and knots on the human mind and when the man tries to
open it, that instance overpower the human mind and converts it to a
new lock and knot such that when man believes that he is opening and
opening he is sealing and locking and knotting. He makes the wall
around his individuality thicker and thicker and imprison him in a
prison that there is no escape for him but it is crystal clear and
hurdle-less for intrusion of Satan and inflicting of pain, misery and
hopelessness upon man. I want to show that we modern humans cannot
and are not allowed to communicate with each other and when we do it,
Satan assertively and immediately outreaches to us to punish us. This
is the panopticon that some recent humans have recognised as the last
retreat of humans into his loneliness.
------
More on Holes and on Dance Floor
You
know the room is full of holes waiting to grab an unpaired
individual, when excited. I said that already: One individual enters
the party without his couple accompanying him. He has left alone. All
couples are dancing. He is watching. Until the music becomes more
exciting and more groovy, then couples "coupling" becomes
loose and also the lone boy becomes excited towards rugged edge of
the dancing people and grabs the next girl at the edge nearest to
him. The girl's partner grabs one from the inner crowd and so on. We
said, assume at the same time a lone girl enters from the diagonally
opposite door and starts the same process. We said each one has got
an opposite sex hole with them. Therefore we have two holes in the
room: one girl and one boy. We said we can actually arrange
experiments to take picture from them. We said they are not as groovy
as others but a bit sluggish. And there will be a point in the middle
that they reach together. Now all people are paired. What happens to
our hole couples? They go and sit on chairs at a corner waiting if
new singled out individual arrives. They have not names. They are not
invited. They do not know how to dance. They do not have any
acquaintances in the crowd. They do not have a body of flesh
materialised. They are just nobody. They just wait for a lonely
individual and an excited dance floor to start to groove. How many of
them exists? There is no difference. Holes do not exist at all. You
can say, many pairs, or just one or just none, until the floor
becomes degenerated: If you invite fifty couple and forty of them
come singled then with no genre of musics you are able to excite the
dance floor.
------
I said holes in the dance floor break causality of
events. It means that before stimulation comes response is there (do
not confuse it with the response in anticipation of stimuli,
which is actually causal). This might make you surprised since you
know causality the most sacred knowledge of human. Even if you say
there are experiments that break causality you implicitly have
acknowledged causality. Those experiments are cause of the knowledge
you get from the experiment. But wait a minute. We know that a
low-pass filter, say in your radio, an ideal low pass filter breaks
the causality. To have an ideal low pass filter your system should be
on from infinite time ago; should be on before you switch it on.
Hence, it is not realisable. You cannot build an ideal low pass
filter and even if you build the best digital radio there always will
be some noise mingled with the desired signal that you like to listen
to, because the filters are not ideal at all. You can make a good
filter but not an ideal one. We have a saying that "he is so
groovy that dances before the music plays." Holes are that
groovy. They are dancing before the guest enters the dancing room.
They are there grooving and when the individual with no partner
enters they attach to him. They wait until the environment becomes
excited. They attach to you with the speed of infinity. This is their
second breach of nature's law. It is believed that nothing can move
faster than light. Well, some say that when you think about a galaxy
one million light years away your thought flies with speeds much
faster than the light. It is an allegory. You have that information
in your mind and you retrieve it very fast; perhaps with the speed of
light, and we do not know more than that. But the hole gets
information of your presence and that you are left alone immediately;
with speed of infinty. You cannot decide if the hole is already in
the salon or it joined to you in the parking or if it was with you
before any time from infinite time ago. Holes become your dancing
partner if the environment becomes exited not when it is gelid. If
you are too shy they are like real partners they do not come to you.
Another hole comes to you ask you to sit in a corner and talk
together. This bridges holes to psychoanalysis that I have selected
as the name of this site.
------
If you are too shy they are like real partners;
they are groovy and they do not like to mix with shy people. Another
hole comes to you ask you to sit in a corner and talk together. You
talk with something that does not exist out there. Or, rather,
something that does not exist out there talks with you. It is your
choice you can go and dance with them or sit and converse. Well,
there are plenty of holes around to mix with. Remember that holes are
as real as you. I did not mean allegory or symbolism. They need two
factors to be realised. First a single individual and then an excited
environment. You can arrange the ballroom with uniformed people and
similar caps such that pictures taken from the ceiling do not reveal
their sex and their individual features. From the left door enters a
single; immediately from the right door enters a hole. You can take
picture that he or she snatches the first partner at the side and
left alone partner of the snatched dancer takes his next door dancer
until at the other end, at the left door, a singled out partner
becomes kicked out of the salon by the bouncer. When you enter as a
single in the dancing room you already bring some discomfort with you
as an excitement into the room, but this is not enough. Further
excitement will come with the music. I had to add this small post to
emphasise that the holes are real and as physically observable as
humans in such an arrangement. They are actually invisible humans,
perhaps a little heavier, if all the individuals in the room have
equal shape and weight in a thought experiment.
------
See, mind-reader comes in a society and tells them
that he has a certain unbelievable art. People see that he has not
hooves, or horns, or fiery eyes or claws or fangs. He looks like
completely like them. They ask what is his art. He says that he can
read mind of an individual who is living among them. After now I call
that individual the targeted victim or just the victim.
At first they believe he is a magician or
something and wants to hustle them. Perhaps he wants to become rich.
Perhaps he wants to become their king or chieftain. Perhaps he wants
beautiful women. Perhaps he wants to live in ease and luxury in their
king's palace or in the great temple. Perhaps he wants fame, respect,
and honour in the society. No; surprisingly, he does not want any of
those. He only wants to use this art for a great goal that is also of
demand of their society in exchange of nothing. Not for nothing but
for a charitable goal to help the society and that individual. The
targeted society does not believe.
They ask him what is his unbelievable art. He says
that he knows everything about that individual. He knows every detail
of his childhood. He knows his friends. He even knows what he is
eating or drinking right now. Whom he loves. Whom he hates. Even what
he sees in his dream and what the victim can remember from his past
dreams. He says that he can induce dreams into the mind of the
targeted victim. People do not believe such a story. Many of them are
magicians and know all these tricks but it does not look like any of
their arts. They assume perhaps the victim is a confederate of the
mind-reader. But no one, near to the victim or far from him have ever
seen the victim with this mind-reader. Perhaps the mind reader wants
boo-licking the victim. There has been no friendship no kinship or
congruity between these two. But the victim, himself is a humble
person of no special recognition in the society. Those who know the
victim recognise that every detail that the mind-reader claims about
the victim is correct.
Perhaps, he has watched the life of the victim for
a long time. But they ask themselves that one usually do these things
for some material gain, for fame, for honour. Why should the
mind-reader watch the victim, an ordinary person, for a long time and
then who has provided for sustaining of such a watch for the
mind-reader? First the mind-reader should convince a benefactor for
his art then commit himself for watching or investigating somebody
else's life. They arrange tests to examine the truth of his claims.
They send people impromptu to the victim and talk with him.
On the other side, far from them, the mind-reader
tells every detail of the conversation; every move of the conversant.
They ask the victim what he has dreamt last night. He remembers them
lucidly as exactly as it is planned by the mind-reader. People become
mesmerised by such an art. They ask him what he wants. They take him
to their ruler, to their highest priests. At first these people also
cannot believe until they become convinced and mesmerised. They
become convinced that the mind-reader does not want anything they
grudge for other people such as wealth, power and such.
The mind-reader does not ask any inconvenience
from them. What if the victim rebels and attack their churches and
palaces. The mind-reader convince them that such things need
planning. When the victim plans for them, he becomes aware and
immediately people overpower him. If the victim decides to approach
certain people and become confederate with them, beforehand they
inform the potential confederates. Mind-reader's only request is the
total access to the victim.
Why? What is the benefit of such an absurd total
access for the ruler, priests and people.
Now, mind-reader looks to the society texture. If
they believe in devil ghosts, he says that the victim is occupied by
those ghosts and the victim might help the ghosts to overcome their
society. If the society believes that they like to hear the voice of
their ancestors to help them into the heavens, then the mind-reader
says that he can adjust the victim as a medium to hear those voices
and when the victim hears those voices the mind-reader also can hear
and will tell them. If the society believes there is a way to live an
eternal life, the mind-reader says that by watching gradual death of
the victim they can discover the secret of eternal life. If the
victim is an illegitimate child, say, like Jesus Christ according to
his enemies, the mind-reader claims that he helps the society to
clean that foul.
But, wait a minute. If the mind-reader can so
perfectly knows about the victim, perhaps king or one of his
entourage also can learn this art and read the mind of neighbour
kings and conquer all the world, but on the condition that they also
do not become aware of existence of such art. Great priest has his
own dreams. He knows that he has no real power in connection with god
or gods or evils and his rituals are void, fake plays to cheat people
and for satisfaction of his greed and lust. If he only partially can
learn this art and keep it in his secret rings and descendants, then
he can cheat thousands and thousands instead of the small population
of his fanatics.
Is not the mind of human the ultimate fruit of
the entire nature from big-bang and black holes and galaxies and
quarks and planets; all worked, until their product can think?
What should that society do in return for such a
charity that makes the mind-reader happy as he asks nothing that they
have. The mind-reader tells them if he asked one of them inflict a
pain to the victim they should obey. But, if the victim dies or be
killed the art of the mind-reader remains unfinished and
inconsequential. King should give time to the mind-reader to make the
king able to harness and use that art for his own goals. Priest
should have enough time to learn that art.
No; no killing or fatal injury is intended - mind
reader assures them. They should use words to inflict pain on
the victim. They should keep the victim harassed, isolated,
sanctioned, hopeless, in twilight of death and life, confined as if
buried alive, suspended as if on the cross, always looking to see the
light at the end of the tunnel but desperate of such glimmer, living
but dying, dying but living, deprived of any kindness, deprived of
love, affection and sympathy, deprived of validity, deprived of
conversation, earning bread, reproducing.
There is only one small obstacle on the way. That
is, the victim does not agree with this scheme. He does not want to
be sacrificed on the altar of mind-reader. He wants to go around and
talk with people and socialise with them. He wants to live his own
life; not the life destined for him by the mind-reader. He might
protest. He might attack to the maddening annoying crowd. He might
punch people to death out of spontaneity and the ruler cannot ignore
the blood-shed and relatives of the dead might betray the whole plot.
The first thing that the mind-reader does ask to
be done is to intimidate the victim by accusing the victim as being a
rebel under persecution of the ruler, under the threat of being
executed by the ruler for his crimes against the state.
The origin of ruling a society is the erection of
phallus of the ruler. That has sublimated generations after
generation in the mind of human as fear from the ruler, from the
king, from disobedience to “law,” fear of regicide. It has been
sublimated into offering yourself and succumb into a compromising
position for the (sexual) gratification and fulfilment of the ruler
and his demands. In this way the mind reader locks the manhood of the
victim into his own possession.
The victim knows that human society is not the
colony of ants and bees. Not all men are created to think and obey
unison in consensus even on the smallest unimportant matters. Inside
a house a wife with his husband quarrel for the colour of curtain.
How is it possible that a wide society all agree on his suffering
even if the most sacred and important matters be at stake.
------
We were talking about the holes in the
semiconductors, then we promised to connect it to psychoanalysis.
Then we jumped on the dance floor until we got to the shy person who
was not groovy and we said that we relate it to psychoanalysis.
Another leap took us to the mind reader in the ancient societies.
What is the synthesis of camel, cow, and leopard;
a giraffe? We have seen holes in the semiconductors actually exist;
they are not a convenience. A hole is an extra positive charge, but
if you examine a piece of superconductor its total charge is zero; it
is neutral. Dance floor analogy is also quite convincing.
But the mind-reader has not any precedence in our knowledge, or in preachers language and teaching of religions. You might say, "Enough; existence of such a thing as a mind-reader seems pure delusion!"
We said that when we look at natural phenomena we should look at a spectrum of each phenomenon. We should look at the continuity of that in evolution. We should see what has changed a fish to a crocodile. What has changed a fish to a dove. What has changed a crocodile plus dove to a horse and what has changed a horse to an ape and ape to human and what will be the next stage. The next stage should be searched inside the human evolution. Human is the tip of arrow. That does not mean that evolution of fish has been stopped. Human evolution is vertically upward, but laterally we can see very shocking events. There is a type of fish living in pitch dark caves, where even a gleam of light cannot be seen for thousand and thousands of years. They look like a trout. They are actually trout, but that they have not eyes. They have eyes in the same place that a trout has, but as if they have eyelids and they have closed their eyelids. They do not need seeing, hence they have lost their eyes as being a redundant item. They eat and reproduce and play and jump up and down and find their ways around and defend themselves without being able to see. Trees are green and human's eye is most sensitive to green light and bulk of the energy of the Sun radiates in green.
What is the state of hydrogen in the centre of the sun where temperature is hundred million degrees and pressure is so immense. Is it a metallic hydrogen and it creates energy in cold fusion actually? If one can push hydrogen atoms , that is protons, under immense pressure next to each other protons might fuse together only due to population not due to temperature and a cold fusion could happen. Neutron stars are so dense that electrons have been fused into the protons and made a whole neutron object. But surprisingly they have a magnetic poles like earth and more surprisingly some have been observed with four magnetic poles. Magnetic poles of earth are due to its iron core. Where the neutron star magnetic poles come from as there is no element inside them but pure neutron? How two magnets remain in some type of stability next to each other?
All these surprises are based on some evidence. How the postulate of a mind reader is supported by any evidence. They even do not exist in our religious teaching. I asserted that Antichrist is a mind reader. Antichrist has been mentioned as the enemy of Jesus Christ as the Satan embodied in form of human. But there is no mention of such a capacity about Antichrist as being a mind reader.
You should note that some ideas have been the consequence of a brave postulate inferred from previous observations not inferred from existing evidences.
You should note that great pyramids were not built by knowing Euclidean geometry; centuries before Euclid. In their buildings their designers used all the Euclidean geometry but they had not a clue of such a beautiful abstraction as the Euclidean geometry.
You should note that Babylonians and many other nations all around the earth could predict lunar and solar eclipse, length of the year, time of equinox and solstice without knowing the theory of Ptolemy; centuries before Ptolemy.
But the other way is correct. Euclid and Ptolemy abstracted and inferred what they had seen from Egyptian buildings and Babylonians astronomy among other things.
We hope we can infer such a creature from the stories that have passed to us, from observation of primitive religions such as druids, and shamans and from more familiar teachings of modern (I mean Judaism, Christianity, and Islam) religions, and besides, from the psychoanalyst theories.
But the mind-reader has not any precedence in our knowledge, or in preachers language and teaching of religions. You might say, "Enough; existence of such a thing as a mind-reader seems pure delusion!"
We said that when we look at natural phenomena we should look at a spectrum of each phenomenon. We should look at the continuity of that in evolution. We should see what has changed a fish to a crocodile. What has changed a fish to a dove. What has changed a crocodile plus dove to a horse and what has changed a horse to an ape and ape to human and what will be the next stage. The next stage should be searched inside the human evolution. Human is the tip of arrow. That does not mean that evolution of fish has been stopped. Human evolution is vertically upward, but laterally we can see very shocking events. There is a type of fish living in pitch dark caves, where even a gleam of light cannot be seen for thousand and thousands of years. They look like a trout. They are actually trout, but that they have not eyes. They have eyes in the same place that a trout has, but as if they have eyelids and they have closed their eyelids. They do not need seeing, hence they have lost their eyes as being a redundant item. They eat and reproduce and play and jump up and down and find their ways around and defend themselves without being able to see. Trees are green and human's eye is most sensitive to green light and bulk of the energy of the Sun radiates in green.
What is the state of hydrogen in the centre of the sun where temperature is hundred million degrees and pressure is so immense. Is it a metallic hydrogen and it creates energy in cold fusion actually? If one can push hydrogen atoms , that is protons, under immense pressure next to each other protons might fuse together only due to population not due to temperature and a cold fusion could happen. Neutron stars are so dense that electrons have been fused into the protons and made a whole neutron object. But surprisingly they have a magnetic poles like earth and more surprisingly some have been observed with four magnetic poles. Magnetic poles of earth are due to its iron core. Where the neutron star magnetic poles come from as there is no element inside them but pure neutron? How two magnets remain in some type of stability next to each other?
All these surprises are based on some evidence. How the postulate of a mind reader is supported by any evidence. They even do not exist in our religious teaching. I asserted that Antichrist is a mind reader. Antichrist has been mentioned as the enemy of Jesus Christ as the Satan embodied in form of human. But there is no mention of such a capacity about Antichrist as being a mind reader.
You should note that some ideas have been the consequence of a brave postulate inferred from previous observations not inferred from existing evidences.
You should note that great pyramids were not built by knowing Euclidean geometry; centuries before Euclid. In their buildings their designers used all the Euclidean geometry but they had not a clue of such a beautiful abstraction as the Euclidean geometry.
You should note that Babylonians and many other nations all around the earth could predict lunar and solar eclipse, length of the year, time of equinox and solstice without knowing the theory of Ptolemy; centuries before Ptolemy.
But the other way is correct. Euclid and Ptolemy abstracted and inferred what they had seen from Egyptian buildings and Babylonians astronomy among other things.
We hope we can infer such a creature from the stories that have passed to us, from observation of primitive religions such as druids, and shamans and from more familiar teachings of modern (I mean Judaism, Christianity, and Islam) religions, and besides, from the psychoanalyst theories.
