Stories of Messengers Become More Realistic

We concluded that as we were moving towards more recent events of history and human became more rigorous in writing and recording of events, messengers of the God also became less supernatural in behaviour and their lives became recorded as the life of ordinary people. The last one established himself among the people and part of his mission covered ordinary administration of a society.

If you read history, the life of Muhammad very carefully has been recorded. What he has left behind has been divided in two parts: one part, based on his own instruction is from God and is collected as a holy book sent from the God, and all of his followers have consensus on every detail of that. Another part of his legacy his followers quote from him as an ordinary person talking from his own intelligence and in many occasions his followers have controversy about.

Read stories of ordinary people who were not prophet and are known as saints and similar entities, living after Muhammad until very recent eras. Still, there are fables attributing strange things to them not attributed to Muhammad. In the Muhammad's holy book, except for his journey to Jerusalem over one night, there is nothing to be interpreted as Muhammad being supernatural being or has done as a supernatural feat; in contrast in any occasion it is emphasized that he was an ordinary human but with a mission. That assertion does not end to Muhammad alone. His book also extends that to other messengers who came before him.

What is the rational inference of this chronology. It is that the positivist philosophy seems to come around. When humans become more scientific they become less superstitious, less believing in supernatural phenomena. It shows that we can reach to the conclusion that prophets before Muhammad also were similar. It is not possible that Moses becomes endowed with such a convincing power and can sink an army chasing him into the sea, but God deprived his son of being able to overpower three soldiers who came and arrested him. As details about Muhammad have been written clearly he completely followed rules of ordinary conflicts and tactics in his campaigns. Sometimes defeated, sometimes won.

What I want to say is that if we say the messengers were supernatural beings it is similar to saying pyramids were built by jennies and ghouls and aliens from other planets not by project managers and geometricians and calculating people. It is similar to saying that man has not capacity to build such a colossal monuments and man has not the capacity to receive the message of god.

Now read history of Muhammad; parts which are not written as the holy book. We read that he talked with people. He invited people for dinner and he invited people to believe. He went to different places and asked them to believe. People stoned him and insulted him without he being able to convince them or stop them. He led some wars and instructed his army to such and such. Everything was absolutely earthly.

Let's go back a few century and go to the time of Jesus Christ. There are similar stories about him. He travelled from this place to other place and talked and invited people and it is said that he faced a court, a trial. Story of that court has been told millions of time during the centuries. It shows defence of an earthly skilled lawyer who foil an unjust prosecutor. The Roman, as it is said, washed his hand. That was correct and meant that in his soul he could not reach  to a legal verdict against Christ. Consider that Romans had a sophisticated administration and lawyers were part of their cultivation; for instance Cicero was a famous lawyer. Romans were familiar with defendants who could thwart government prosecutors by pointing out the right precedence and written laws.

That will eliminate the need to add thunder bolts and lightning to the story.

Religion Is Abstraction

I frequently reiterate that I am not one who wants to preach any of the existing religions. I am not one who wants to prove that any of the existing religions is actually consistent with the modern science or modern psychology, or modern politics and is good for the well being and moral behaviour though they look superstitious and old fashioned. I do not want to prove that modern life is analytic and people should have a synthetic soul and should escape from the maddening tumult and lust of their environment in cities to comfort and peace of religions in the convents and monasteries and meditate.
No, I want to say that religion is not religion. Pyramids supposedly were built as being very big tombstones for a wealthy and powerful person as the symbol of his religion. And archaeologists go there and clean bones with a fine brush and sit there for years to find a piece of charcoal. For me it shows practical people sitting together, calculating, knowing materials, managing workforce, and defending projects to sponge more money from the king for their wild imaginations. It means they knew formulas of trigonometry. They were true when they told the king that with such a project he would be resurrected. They were true when they said that the king needed all those paraphernalia when he would resurrect. He needs the golden mask to be recognised as with his real face as a king. They were true that he needed those paintings and writings on the walls with servants and ministers and story of his daily life when he should be resurrected. They were not fools to put stones on top of the stones because of their wrong stupid idea of resurrection of their king.
Now listen to people who were descendants of builders of those pyramids and were living millenniums after those builders. They had all kinds of stories about those pyramids such as being built by monsters and jennies and such; couldn't believe their great great grandfathers were in that capacity they attribute to monsters. Even in modern times some people said that man could not build such colossal buildings. They say that those were built by aliens from other worlds. They say that those were built by whipping slaves. You can gather not slaves, but a million of paid workers and start to shout at them to build a mound of dirt and then go and come back after a year and see if anything has been done. But, we have Euclid who could make an elegant abstraction out of those builders' rough ideas; abstractions that did not include monsters and aliens and slaves.
In the similar way we have other types of stories such as a garden and a married couple and a mesmerising snake who could defy the sanctuary of god and could tempt the woman to eat from a forbidden tree. What is its abstraction? Here, a most dreadful animal for human becomes tempting. Why that thing should not come in a more presentable form?
Then we get to the story of a flood that covers all the earth since in a village a group of people were making fun of a crazy person who was building a ship far from any water in the middle of the desert. This is more acceptable story than the tempting snake.
Then Abraham's and after him Moses' gradually become more acceptable: There is no tempting snake and Sweden will not become flooded for the sin of a village in the Middle East.
Until we get to story of Jesus Christ which includes even less supernatural events. Still, he has some strange arts such as converting water to expensive wines but people kill him instead of making a profitable business out of him. When it gets to Muhammad it becomes so realistic that "Muhammad goes to mountain if mountain does not come to him." Then people know very detailed account of his time and day to day life of him.
What is the abstraction of these. You might say that it is enough since you can guess that I am going to paraphrase them as symbols of something earthly. No, remember, Euclidean geometry is abstraction of the facts and by itself it is divine. It is not earthly

Mind Reader, Holes, and Psychoanalyst

We were talking about the holes in the semiconductors, then we promised to connect it to psychoanalysis. Then we jumped on the dance floor until we got to the shy person who was not groovy and we said that we relate it to psychoanalysis. Another leap took us to the mind reader in the ancient societies. What is the synthesis of camel, cow, and leopard; a giraffe? We have seen holes in the semiconductors actually exist; they are not a convenience. A hole is an extra positive charge, but if you examine a piece of semiconductor its total charge is zero; it is neutral. Dance floor analogy is also quite convincing.

But the mind-reader has not any precedence in our knowledge, or in preachers language and teaching of religions. You might say, "Enough; existence of such a thing as a mind-reader seems pure delusion!"

We said that when we look at natural phenomena we should look at a spectrum of each phenomenon. We should look at the continuity of that in evolution. We should see what has changed a fish to a crocodile. What has changed a fish to a dove. What has changed a crocodile plus dove to a horse and what has changed a horse to an ape and ape to human and what will be the next stage. The next stage should be searched inside the human evolution. Human is the tip of the arrow. That does not mean that evolution of fish has been stopped. Human evolution is vertically upward, but laterally we can see very shocking events. There is a type of fish living in pitch dark caves, where even a gleam of light cannot be seen for thousand and thousands of years. They look like a trout. They are actually trouts, but that they have not eyes. They have eyes in the same place that a trout has, but as if they have eyelids and they have closed their eyelids. They do not need seeing, hence they have lost their eyes as being a redundant item. They eat and reproduce and play and jump up and down and find their ways around and defend themselves without being able to see. Trees are green and human's eye is most sensitive to green light and bulk of the energy of the Sun radiates in green.

What is the state of hydrogen in the centre of the sun where temperature is hundred million degrees and pressure is so immense. Is it a metallic hydrogen and it creates energy in cold fusion actually?  If one can push hydrogen atoms , that is protons, under immense pressure next to each other protons might fuse together only due to population not due to temperature and a cold fusion could happen. Neutron stars are so dense that electrons have been fused into the protons and made a whole neutron object. But surprisingly they have a magnetic poles like earth and more surprisingly some have been observed with four magnetic poles. Magnetic poles of earth are due to its iron core. Where the neutron star magnetic poles come from as there is no element inside them but pure neutron? How two magnets remain in some type of stability next to each other?

All these surprises are based on some evidence. How the postulate of a mind reader is supported by any evidence. They even do not exist in our religious teaching. I asserted that Antichrist is a mind reader. Antichrist has been mentioned as the enemy of Jesus Christ as the Satan embodied in form of human. But there is no mention of such a capacity about Antichrist as being a mind reader.

You should note that some ideas have been the consequence of a brave postulate inferred from previous observations not inferred from existing evidences.

You should note that great pyramids were not built by knowing Euclidean geometry; centuries before Euclid. In their buildings their designers used all the Euclidean geometry but they had not a clue of such a beautiful abstraction as the Euclidean geometry.

You should note that Babylonians and many other nations all around the earth could predict lunar and solar eclipse, length of the year, time of equinox and solstice without knowing the theory of Ptolemy; centuries before Ptolemy.

But the other way is correct. Euclid and Ptolemy abstracted and inferred what they had seen from Egyptian buildings and Babylonians astronomy among other things.

We hope we can infer such a creature from the stories that have passed to us, from observation of primitive religions such as druids, and shamans and from more familiar teachings of modern (I mean Judaism, Christianity, and Islam) religions, and besides, from the psychoanalyst theories.

Antichrist is the mind reader: Part one

See, mind-reader comes in a society and tells them that he has a certain unbelievable art. People can behold that he has not hooves, or horns, or fiery eyes or claws or fangs. He looks completely like any of them. They ask what is his art. He says that he can read mind of an individual who is living among them. After now I call that individual the targeted victim or just the victim.

At first they believe he is a magician or something and wants to hustle them. Perhaps he wants to become rich. Perhaps he wants to become their king or chieftain. Perhaps he wants beautiful women. Perhaps he wants to live in ease and luxury in their king's palace or in the great temple. Perhaps he wants fame, respect, and honour in the society. No; surprisingly, he does not want any of those. He only wants to use this art for a great goal that is also of demand of their society in exchange of nothing. Not for nothing but for a charitable goal to help the society and that individual. The targeted society does not believe.

They ask him what is his unbelievable art. He says that he knows everything about that individual. He knows every detail of his childhood. He knows his friends. He even knows what he is eating or drinking right now. Whom he loves. Whom he hates. Even what he sees in his dream and what the victim can remember from his past dreams. He says that he can induce dreams into the mind of the targeted victim. People do not believe such a story. Many of them are magicians and know all these tricks but it does not look like any of their arts. They assume perhaps the victim is a confederate of the mind-reader. But no one, near to the victim or far from him have ever seen the victim with this mind-reader. Perhaps the mind reader wants boot-licking the victim. There has been no friendship no kinship or congruity between these two.  But the victim, himself is a humble person of no special recognition in the society. Those who know the victim recognise that every detail that the mind-reader claims about the victim is correct.

Perhaps, he has watched the life of the victim for a long time. But they ask themselves that one usually do these things for some material gain, for fame, for honour. Why should the mind-reader watch the victim, an ordinary person,  for a long time and then who has provided for sustaining of such a watch for the mind-reader? First the mind-reader should convince a benefactor for his art then commit himself for watching or investigating somebody else's life. They arrange tests to examine the truth of his claims. They send people impromptu to the victim and talk with him.

On the other side, far from them, the mind-reader tells every detail of the conversation; every move of the conversant. They ask the victim what he has dreamt last night. He remembers them lucidly as exactly as it is planned by the mind-reader. People become mesmerised by such an art. They ask him what he wants. They take him to their ruler, to their highest priests. At first these people also cannot believe until they become convinced and mesmerised. They become convinced that the mind-reader does not want anything they grudge for other people such as wealth, power and such.

The mind-reader does not ask any inconvenience from them. What if the victim rebels and attack their churches and palaces. The mind-reader convince them that such things need planning. When the victim plans for them, he becomes aware and immediately people overpower him. If the victim decides to approach certain people and become confederate with them, beforehand they inform the potential confederates. Mind-reader's only request is the total access to the victim.

Why? What is the benefit of such an absurd total access for the ruler, priests and people.

Now, mind-reader looks to the society texture. If they believe in devil ghosts, he says that the victim is occupied by those ghosts and the victim might help the ghosts to overcome their society. If the society believes that they like to hear the voice of their ancestors to help them into the heavens, then the mind-reader says that he can adjust the victim as a medium to hear those voices and when the victim hears those voices the mind-reader also can hear and will tell them. If the society believes there is a way to live an eternal life, the mind-reader says that by watching gradual death of the victim they can discover the secret of eternal life. If the victim is an illegitimate child, say, like Jesus Christ according to his enemies, the mind-reader claims that he helps the society to clean that foul.

But, wait a minute. If the mind-reader can so perfectly knows about the victim, perhaps king or one of his entourage also can learn this art and read the mind of neighbour kings and conquer all the world, but on the condition that they also do not become aware of existence of such art. Great priest has his own dreams. He knows that he has no real power in connection with god or gods or evils and his rituals are void, fake plays to cheat people and for satisfaction of his greed and lust. If he only partially can learn this art and keep it in his secret rings and descendants, then he can cheat thousands and thousands instead of the small population of his fanatics.

Is not the mind of human the ultimate fruit of the entire nature from big-bang and black holes and galaxies and quarks and planets; all worked, until their product can think?

What should that society do in return for such a charity that makes the mind-reader happy as he asks nothing that they have. The mind-reader tells them if he asked one of them inflict a pain to the victim they should obey. But, if the victim dies or be killed the art of the mind-reader remains unfinished and inconsequential. King should give time to the mind-reader to make the king able to harness and use that art for his own goals. Priest should have enough time to learn that art.

No; no killing or fatal injury is intended - mind reader assures them. They should use words to inflict pain on the victim. They should keep the victim harassed, isolated, sanctioned, hopeless, in twilight of death and life, confined as if buried alive, suspended as if on the cross, always looking to see the light at the end of the tunnel but desperate of such glimmer, living but dying, dying but living, deprived of any kindness, deprived of love, affection and sympathy, deprived of validity, deprived of conversation, earning bread, reproducing.

There is only one small obstacle on the way. That is, the victim does not agree with this scheme. He does not want to be sacrificed on the altar of mind-reader. He wants to go around and talk with people and socialise with them. He wants to live his own life; not the life destined for him by the mind-reader. He might protest. He might attack to the maddening annoying crowd. He might punch people to death out of spontaneity and the ruler cannot ignore the blood-shed and relatives of the dead might betray the whole plot.

The first thing that the mind-reader does ask to be done is to intimidate the victim by accusing the victim as being a rebel under persecution of the ruler, under the threat of being executed by the ruler for his crimes against the state.

The origin of ruling a society is the erection of phallus of the ruler. That has sublimated generations after generation in the mind of human as fear from the ruler, from the king, from disobedience to “law,” fear of regicide. It has been sublimated into offering yourself and succumb into a compromising position for the (sexual) gratification and fulfilment of the ruler and his demands. In this way the mind reader locks the manhood of the victim into his own possession.  

This is the first element of Satanic ritual of sacrificing man.

The victim knows that human society is not the colony of ants and bees. Not all men are created to think and obey unison in consensus even on the smallest unimportant matters. Inside a house a wife with his husband quarrel for the colour of curtain. How is it possible that a wide society all agree on his suffering even if the most sacred and important matters be at stake.

Holes Are Real!

If you are too shy they are like real partners; they are groovy and they do not like to mix with shy people. Another hole comes to you ask you to sit in a corner and talk together. You talk with something that does not exist out there. Or, rather, something that does not exist out there talks with you. It is your choice you can go and dance with them or sit and converse. Well, there are plenty of holes around to mix with. Remember that holes are as real as you. I did not mean allegory or symbolism. They need two factors to be realised. First a single individual and then an excited environment. You can arrange the ballroom with uniformed people and similar caps such that pictures taken from the ceiling do not reveal their sex and their individual features. From the left door enters a single; immediately from the right door enters a hole. You can take picture that he or she snatches the first partner at the side and left alone partner of the snatched dancer takes his next door dancer until at the other end, at the left door, a singled out partner becomes kicked out of the salon by the bouncer. When you enter as a single in the dancing room you already bring some discomfort with you as an excitement into the room, but this is not enough. Further excitement will come with the music. I had to add this small post to emphasise that the holes are real and as physically observable as humans in such an arrangement. They are actually invisible humans, perhaps a little heavier, if all the individuals in the room have equal shape and weight in a thought experiment.

Causality and the Holes?

I said that the holes on the dance floor break causality of events. It means that before stimulation comes response is there (do not confuse it with the response in anticipation of stimuli, which is actually causal). This might make you surprised since you know causality the most sacred knowledge of human. Even if you say there are experiments that break causality you implicitly have acknowledged causality. Those experiments are cause of the knowledge you get from the experiment. But wait a minute. We know that a low-pass filter, say in your radio, an ideal low pass filter breaks the causality. To have an ideal low pass filter your system should be turned on from infinite time ago; should be turned on before you switch it on. Hence, it is not realisable. You cannot build an ideal low pass filter and even if you build the best digital radio, there always will be some noise mingled with the desired signal that you like to listen to, because the filters are not ideal at all. You can make a good filter but not an ideal one. We have a saying that "he is so groovy that dances before the music plays." Holes are that groovy. They are dancing before the guest enters the dancing room. They are there grooving and when the individual with no partner enters they attach to him. They wait until the environment becomes excited. They attach to you with the speed of infinity. This is their second breach of nature's law. It is believed that nothing can move faster than light. Well, some say that when you think about a galaxy one million light years away your thought flies with speeds much faster than the light. It is an allegory. You have that information in your mind and you retrieve it very fast; perhaps with the speed of light, and we do not know more than that. But the hole gets information of your presence and that you are a left-alone immediately; with speed of infinity. You cannot decide if the hole is already in the salon or it joined to you in the parking or if it was with you before any time from infinite time ago. Holes become your dancing partner if the environment becomes exited not when it is gelid. If you are too shy they are like real partners they do not come to you. Another hole comes to you ask you to sit in a corner and talking together. This bridges the holes to the psychoanalysis that I have selected as the name of this site.

More on Holes and on Dance Floor

You know the room is full of holes waiting to grab an unpaired individual, when excited. I said that already: One individual enters the party without his couple accompanying him. He has left alone. All couples are dancing. He is watching. Until the music becomes more exciting and more groovy, then couples "coupling" becomes loose and also the lone boy becomes excited towards rugged edge of the dancing people and grabs the next girl at the edge nearest to him. The girl's partner grabs one from the inner crowd and so on. We said, assume at the same time a lone girl enters from the diagonally opposite door and starts the same process. We said each one has got an opposite sex hole with them. Therefore we have two holes in the room: one girl and one boy. We said we can actually arrange experiments to take picture from them. We said they are not as groovy as others but a bit sluggish. And there will be a point in the middle that they reach together. Now all people are paired. What happens to our hole couples? They go and sit on chairs at a corner waiting if new singled out individual arrives. They have not names. They are not invited. They do not know how to dance. They do not have any acquaintances in the crowd. They do not have a body of flesh materialised. They are just nobody. They just wait for a lonely individual and an excited dance floor to start to groove. How many of them exists? There is no difference. Holes do not exist at all. You can say, many pairs, or just one or just none, until the floor becomes degenerated: If you invite fifty couple and forty of them come singled then with no genre of musics you are able to excite the dance floor.

Man in Panopticon

I have written frequently that my aim is not to prove the god and religion by using science. Modern science and the idea of god and religion as we know them are contradictory. I said that I do not mean that the idea of god is good for the psychological benefits of human and giving him comfort and insight for his daily behaviour or inspire and frighten him towards a better moral behaviour. Everything that you claim is so vast and vaguely understood by man that excludes me to commit. Each claim goes into the realm of dedicated scholarships of individuals and groups of people. Why should god sends his son or a messenger who has a very partial knowledge of human affairs let alone to help them to eternal salvage. Messiah only brings some news and some people could only believe him and mostly people could not believe except by conversion, by a sudden transformation of soul. I have shown the contradictory nature of these two discourse: science and religion. Hence, what is all that about the excitons and psychoanalysis? I want to show that there are things that are conceivable. I want to show that the idea of god and Satan is in the spectrum of human thoughts without creating a contradiction or using glib of preachers in bypassing and jumping over those contradictions. I want to show that if modern science tries in denying my argument it similarly has to jump and bypass its own contradictions. In this way I'll be able to demonstrate a unified outlook. Exciton is something in a spectrum - spectrum of artificial elements -  that has been created in a very unusual conditions. It is part of the nature but man cannot find it in the nature. On the other hand, I want to show that an instance of the language has been created by the modern man that puts locks and knots on the human mind and when the man tries to open it, that instance overpower the human mind and converts it to a new lock and knot such that when man believes that he is opening and opening he is sealing and locking and knotting. He makes the wall around his individuality thicker and thicker and imprison him in a prison that there is no escape for him but it is crystal clear and hurdle-less for intrusion of Satan and inflicting of pain, misery and hopelessness upon man. I want to show that we modern humans cannot and are not allowed to communicate with each other and when we do it, Satan assertively and immediately outreaches to us to punish us. This is the panopticon that some recent humans have recognised as the last retreat of humans into his loneliness.

Excitons and Psychoanalyst (2)

First, allow me to discuss exciton in nature. When you dope some impurity in a semiconductor material, inside the crystal structure of that material you can create an additional electron coupled with a lack of electron (a positive hole). They act like a Hydrogen atom: Hole is a light weight positive charge with a mass a little more than  mass of an electron. You can create many of these atoms. All modern electronics and lasers and LED's are working on this basis. There is a hope that you can create such an immense concentration of Excitons to turn them into a metallic form similar to metallic hydrogen. (Hydrogen is actually a metal with properties similar to lithium and sodium, but it shows those physical metalic properties, such as electrical conduction, under unbelievable pressure to keep its atom in a metallic structure.) Then there is a hope that you can increase concentration of doping to degenerate that metal into a superconductor (similar to super-conducting high temperature metallic hydrogen ); a superconductor inside a semiconductor. In that case it is possible to manufacture computer parts that do not need cooling and can work with a torch battery. They do it, though in fifty years. Then what is a hole in our ball room party? It does not exist on the dance floor as far as all dancers are paired. When there comes an unpaired individual, the dance floor becomes a little excited due to that presence, but not enough to create an Exciton, as far as the dance lattice remains stiffed due to a calm music. It should become excited by applying a more exciting music to the environment. When an unpaired individual enters then a hole is created. What is that? It is an effect due to presence of an unpaired one. It becomes created with speed of infinity (in nature we do not have speed more than speed of light, but that hole defies that postulate). It is non-causal: Hole is there before its cause enters the room. It is not the matter. It is somewhere. It is a spirit. You know the room is full of holes waiting to grab an unpaired individual, when excited.

Excitons and Psychoanalyst

In older posts, I described briefly about some modern observations in nature of chemical elements. I talked about anti-matter and artificial elements and nonperceivable elements such as muoniums. I left out one important case and that is the exciton. This element is created when nothingness becomes excited! It exists but in twilight of existence. What is the use of such thing in the nature. All you see right now in screen of your computer is due to such existence. Assume you are inviting equal numbers of girls and boys to a school ball. You expect people become paired when the band plays a cheek-to-cheek. what happens if a girl or a guy does not get their invitation card on-time. You are lacking a coupling place; some one remains alone. If you make the environment excited enough by changing the music to a more modern rhythm, the lonely person can snatch his/her couple from a pair and makes the other partner alone. The left alone individual can do the same with the nearest couple and this can create an additional observable commotion rippling over the dancing motions of people. There is an empty place for one missed individual but it seems as filled by the excitement. You can say one person is dancing with a bubble, with a "hole!" There is a couple there created by excitation, compensating the absent guest.They look as a natural couple similar to others. This "hole" dancer only is a bit more heavier and sluggish than all other dancers in turning and bending and other motions. You can create senarios and by taking snap shots from above the dance floor calculating weight of this invisible dancer. You can 'inject' a spare partner from opposite door of the ball room until two single dancers meet up in the centre of the room, the hole gets filled. Suddenly, all will have their partners, shout in relaxation and the excitement fades out; many scenarios, just "gedanken." The couple might win the fruit basket of the best dancers of the night and the umpire calls the "exciton couple" as the winner. Remains where is psychoanalysis in this discussion?

Why Psychoanalyst? (3)

Psychoanalysis, in its original advertisements of its founder, has touched a vast arena of human rituals and their relation with some phenomena seen in certain groups of humans, described as neurosis. Psychoanalysis in its endeavour to discover that had to investigate remote concepts such as totems, taboos, and the role of phallus and the role of the primitive ruler and the role of father in human societies. It explains ideas such as patricide and regicide and the feeling of guilt. As said ingenuity of the founder was not followed with an integration of his ideas in a more unified and honest approach of his advertisers. Do not make a mistake and do not accuse me that I am knowing him a prophet. Let me clear me. It is an analogy that I use. He was like a prophet, honestly advertising his findings as a scientist should, but his followers were like preachers who advertise a religion as a career to earn a sustenance of worldly values, some vehemently, some hopelessly, and some with no appetite at all. I said my talks about this branch of human knowledge has  as much use for me as my talks about proton and RNA. Messiah, is a defender, but not more than that. Messiah is not follower. Others are follower. Messiah is the balance and the gauge for others. Others are connections and nodes to connect to Him: not to connect anything to him, but to connect He to Him; to connect Man to Man, to connect the entire existence to existence. In first emergence's of human societies, we have family: mother, father, children and grandchildren, ruler, and an entity there: he is the witch, or medicine man, or something around this concept. There are details. For instance, father was not there similar to what we then had until now. Mother was. She was carrying the result of human regeneration and hence attachment was to her. Father could be anyone. Psychoanalyst discovered that the male child of human has a hidden tendency to eliminate his father. (Regretfully, later these novel ideas fell in the hands of brothel runners.) In place of father there was the uncle. This uncle was brother of mother. He was the mirror that could inspire the male child. Look! Pieces of puzzle are here. Abraham had no father, brought up by his uncle. Generations after generations people never asked why. But Abraham means father of people. He established fatherhood. His fatherhood established by many rituals that needs to be investigated. Moses had no father. You do not know the story in this way, none of you. His name shows that: Moses, taken from the water. Jesus had no father. His father was god. Next and the last one was also known as the "Mohammad the Waif" These stories later has been modified by the preachers to alter the life of these greatest unique personalities of humans to become similar to a spoiled prince or a hero of no value with many similar entities born everyday in a corner of the Earth.

Original Sin? (2)

 We understood that the only sin is the creation in an arena that everything is hostile to the creation. Everything is dying. Everything is destroying to the most delicate of all: the life. That hostility remains accompanying and chasing, intriguing the ascending being towards descend and annihilation. It is a wound, not healing ever, left back. It remains as a whisper in the ear, in the mind, in the existence of the upwardness of creation. It looks for a lapse for a wink to overcome and take everything back. It accumulates more and more when creation soars higher and higher. That is the pain. It happens that that pain falls on the shoulder of man with all of its heaviness. It is offered to heavens. It is offered to mountains. None accept. They say we draw lot whom his name comes out he carries it. But then they cheat. They write on all  the ballots only one name; only Messiah's name. And when they draw the lot it comes to Messiah to carry it. It is the cross that Messiah carries. Son of God, man, sacrifices for the sake of creation. He tolerate all the pains of the wound that He has created in creation. He tolerates for the original sin of man - original sin of God - creation. And Antichrist remains in the back fallen and defeated again dying and burning in his jealousy of witnessing the creation and evolving of the human mind.

Why Psychoanalyst? (2)

Psychoanalysis is a human achievement and supposedly is very materialistic and takes god from the arena of human life and knows other factors affecting human destiny. First, I said that I am talking with modern human and his modern mind in modern words. I am empty of any religion. All cults and religions and ideas existing at this time are part of career of a group of people and they are not for connection to the God. People who consume those products might benefit or might use it as some remedies for their daily pains but at the end they might become confused of inherent contradictions of those teachings with their modern mind. I already used some facts and findings of modern mind such as proton and RNA and muonium to navigate ahead. But I have used the psychoanalyst for my Blog and my web site names. I use this similarly for navigation only, until it remains the truth with its shininess. Second, this word, psychoanalyst, and part of its methods of interpretation of the human soul have been subjected to abuse by any type of preachers from its own discipline of psychology to every domain of day to day life of humans. Normally, I do not mention any name, since I am not writing any science here to cite names of discoverers and scientists. As psychoanalysis has huge impact on and blurring boundaries with religion I have to talk a paragraph about it. I did not write such a paragraph, say, about proton because people have been so frightened by modern science to interfere, or doubt about that modern ecclesiastical. Hence, they take it granted and I could move smoothly in that part. When it comes to the soul of humans, then everybody has a firm idea that cannot be disputed and he could abuse words in expanding anything from any beginning proposition to any ending proposition. Psychoanalysis established with vast discoveries about human soul at the beginning of twentieth century similar to modern physics. Its difference with modern physics was that, after its founder, it was not guarded by the same zeal as modern physics and it did not enjoy to be flourished and ramified with equal ingenuity of minds compareable to the founder of psychoanalysis, similarly. As the flow of science started to move towards the new world, it soon married with money and became arena of banality. Media used it to promote consumption of sex products. Governments and politics used it to opiate people with a scientific-like reasoning. Preachers and mushrooming cults used it to preach any idea. It became the language of generalised non-sense that can be interpreted by the audience individual suppositions. Until now that, everyday millions of  words are pushed into the minds of humans as the pshychoanalyst insights. Gradually it is becoming the tool of Satan for corrupting the language of human, The Words. Humans, making their tower towards the heaven towards reaching to the God and bringing him down, become corrupted in the language and they lose communications with each other ever increasingly.

Original Sin

Hence, god made a "mistake" who created man and Satan rebelled. Then why religions are obsessed with the original sin of the man? Because it is wrongly understood. Satan appears in the arena at the same point that man appears on the stage. Satan is interwoven with human. Son of the God should pay back for the original sin of man. But it is supposed that the Son is a different entity from the man and He should pay for him. God sacrifices His own Son for the sin of man. Already Abraham should sacrifice his son for a promise to God. God had asked him to do such a sacrifice. But later god sent the angel to inform Abraham that it had been just a test of his faith and obedience towards the god. We are on the track of discovery of an old, an ancient story but otherwise a wisdom, a wisdom of the past by putting pieces of time tormented puzzle together. We have to figure out what could be the parts that we have not found but actually existed at the dawn of human civilisation in its recent and more sophisticated form. What man saw at that time that he recorded in this way, and it is full of inspiration for all humans on the earth through the history. Why so many passionate heads climb voluntarily on the gallows of history to defend different forms of this story without asking a reward and they become the most admired characters remaining on the hearts of humans century after century. Messiah says, "There is no original sin committed by man. It is 'mistake' of god in creation of man that has been interpreted wrongly as the sin of man." When you cut a piece of marble from the mountain to create a statue its empty place remains as a sin in the mountain; by chiseling out each piece that sin becomes greater. Your sin remains in the form of geometry of the created piece to the end of time. Your sin accompanies the beauty of  your creation. The hollow in the mountain screams to take your creation back and that hollow remains there as a wound. They both appear at the same point and intertwine together. The hollow seduce the beauty all the time and frighten him of going back to shapelessness that he had. RNA comes into the world not by the fear of hunger but by the fear that it has not a backup in the world if he suffers annihilation. Hence he creates himself again and again. He takes chemicals from the world and leaves hollow in their place. He weaves them like the most perfect artist, perfect with the whole meaning of the perfection. He weaves them with not even a slightest difference into his own form, by watching his beautiful face in the mirror of space-time and puts them in a corner of the gallery. This exhibition gallery is full of similar artworks, in shape, form and colors and shadings, but in the eyes of beholder who is the only lonely guest there, all are consummate of artifacts; all are masterpieces in splendour. Up is freezing cold and lacking the chemicals for the sculptor. Down is hot and molten. He occupies diligently, all that is possible to occupy, to the deepest down and to the highest up and extends the dominion of his creation. He is here to stay.

Why Psychoanalyst?

They teach to children that during the Moses' time witches and their witchcraft were the most important feat one could achieve. During the Jesus' era medicine was considered the prodigy to follow. During Muhammad's time and place creating literature was what one should show to gain the attention of public. Perhaps you might think that I have selected psychoanalysis as people of our time are infatuated with that kind of rhetoric to be compelled to follow. In all of those childish catechisms you are wrong. It is the idea of preachers who believe these historical figures are extraordinary humans or demi-gods with perfections in talents of humans as the winners of some Olympiad games. I heard from one follower of Muhammad that formula for solving the quartic equations could be extracted from their holly book. He was familiar only with a high school basic algebra and that problem seemed very difficult for him. I have had a look at the holly books of Abraham's descendants including Muhammad and also at the holly books of Buddhists and Zoroastrians. There is nothing about witchcraft or medicine or literature or equations in them. You can exhaust all of them in one sentences: God is gracious and human has an enemy in a corner that is so easily can be seen but even god cannot over-power it. That was all. That entity, called Satan, wages a war against the God on the excuse of the "mistake" of god in creation of human. It knows that the God exists; in certitude, not like humans in all the time doubt. It knows that the God is almighty and omnipotent. It KNOWS. But in the face of god, It rebels. Modern humans, in spite of accepting the idea of god among ninety-five percent of them, if asked about their belief, become perplexed admitting such trivial contradicting story. Satan declares war against god but god has no asset to be violated but His humble creature, the man. (My Christian friend, now do you understand why Christ is the son of the Lord?) Such a vast universe is of no value for invasion of Satan except a feeble couple that god has created as His only sign of power. The amazing quad-polar neutron star was not enough for God to appreciate His own power. God could only be satisfied if a human discovers that. Hmm? Hence, Satan an angel in a corner unknown to god came out of its amorphous background he had among other angels at the same time that man was created. After finishing delivering Its ultimatum to god it sneaks into the Paradise, the honey moon resort god booked for the newly coupled, to corrupt the man and his wife.

How to Win?

Hence, proton only stays but RNA stays and replicates. He builds him times and times again. He is one step upper. Man stays and replicates and "knows" that there should be one step upper than RNA. Proton has a doubt that he can stays so joggles all the time its constituents to become sure. RNA has doubt that it can stays and it actually has one of himself -replicated- in a corner. Hence it replicates and replicates. Man joggles with his mind all the time to quench the thirst of doubt he has got about being a mind. We know that there are myriad of stages between being a proton and being an RNA. There are myriads of stages between being an RNA and being a man. But those stages are not sharp enough to help to define a special position for them. We know there are groups of people who interpret world scientifically to deduce existence of God from those interpretations. For instance, they say there should come together say sixty or seventy factors to make the creation of life on earth possible. Say in solar system earth should be in a narrowly defined distance from the Sun and from the Jupiter and should have a moon of this size, pattern of radiation of the Sun, iron core of the earth, spatial coordination of carbon orbitals, polarity of water molecule and its amazing angle (between hydrogen bonds). Yes, I admit that it is fascinating but in terms of understanding of beyond they are not more amazing than this: How can you become millionaire in a night in a casino? Assume you  shuffle cards and the outcome of the shuffling be a straight flush for you. Are you a winner, guaranteed? Definitely, no; since you are a winner if at least one opponent has got a hand near to yours to multiply the table "pot." Best is that you shuffle in a way that everybody has got a good hand. Normally in the next round you lose all you have earned except that the same pattern of hands happens to you. If you win quite a few hands, some large size but otherwise polite employees of the casino inform you that you look too tired out to be allowed to remain in casino just due to their concern for your health. Hence, what is the likeliness that shuffling of brand new cards becomes tandem together for you and your opponents and with a fair casino who let you win all through the night? Now, try to figure out the likeliness of the next story. There are rare fluctuations in nature that break all the laws of nature based on pure statistics. For example, it can cause half of the water in the glass in front of you boils and the other half becomes frozen as the expense for boiling the other half. This is against the laws of thermodynamics, but it is probable. Any thermodynamic event can have such a free paid casino winning. What is the odd that you can take on a jet-liner and it takes you to your destination by such a gamble wining process? Having said that, there are fluctuations that can happen in a very remote future of the world even after all the black holes who devoured all the galaxis then, they themselves become evaporated and all the most stable nucleon of irons (which are even more stable than black holes) become evaporated and the universe turns to an amorphous uniform, almost in zero degree Kelvin, magma of "leptons" those fluctuations can act against the odds and do the impossible and create a world. The first hand is not a winner. Needs another fluctuation. The second hand is winner but has not good hands for opponents. It shuffles and serves hands until a tandem of shuffles and servings set you behind a computer but without a nose so the world collapse to another round of shuffling until everything is at their right and correct places as this moment. Next round of shuffles should sustain the physical laws of the universe to prevent its collapse back to an unknown situation. Why this story is probable but your casino night is not? It is because if you want to win in that way in the casino you should own all the money of the world and the night should be as long as a million nights. That amorphous magma has all the necessary materials and a time to infinity so it can shuffle and serve until it wins. As if children are playing with fake money and show their cards to their opponents when they feel pity for him. I told this story to say that those groups with their rare fascinating sixty seventy factors of life cannot over-power a serious atheist equipped with story of fluctuations. If you do that you are continuing to admit your ignorance. You have to retire your proposition until the next discovery amaze you. You cannot prove anything. Still, if you are a preacher of a religion you might decide that those amazing findings might help your audience to juggle with their minds to discover, what they can discover, alone into a conversion and transcend of their minds towards higher tiers of evolution.

Story of Prophets

If people become partitioned towards Antichrist then they'll become partitioned towards Messiah. Then it changes to a fair game of humans not something beyond affairs of daily life.  Part of suffering of Messiah and all the prophets is that they become left lonely and unbelieved and mocked at. They should not share their visions with groups of people, as they could not. We said that people should accept this phenomenon as a conversion of faith not by evidences and proofs but by hints and road maps. Perhaps you have heard or are familiar with the Socrates' notion of  dialectic. One should annihilate all attributes that make a phenomenon shared, and owns in common with other phenomena until at the end of annihilation one gets to that phenomenon that he is studying with all its pureness and carved out of its background, solid and existing and tangible in front of him, until he become sure that that phenomenon actually exists in its reality, all sparkling and shining and eye dazzling and all beingness. At the beginning you believe that you are killing that phenomenon by denying everything for him, but at the end it comes out more alive for you than anything else. If Messiah stays longer among us, he is describing prophets, Jesus, Muhammad, Moses, Abraham in a new way for modern human. For the faithfuls of those religions, at first it might come heavy to accept but then they appreciate that if those people have had something related to all the creation then believing them as philosophers, orators, physicians, shrewd merchant, converter of water to wine or to blood is actually degrading them to ordinary humans with similar interests. All of them were face to face to Antichrist, to that carrier of the most profane. It is not that Antichrist was only at the time of Jesus Christ. That entity is part of the mission of all messengers of god, including Buddha and Zoroaster.

Anti-Christ Is a Real Phenomenon in Nature (3)

Usually, I have read many ideas about "Ahriman" or Satan, other names for and the same entity as "Anti-Christ." They attribute such entity to a political character, sometimes to very cunning rich people, or to criminals. Such characters, if bad, or even worst of them are bad in the context of ordinary human experience. Their actions could be satanic but they are not Satan. Satan is a cosmological phenomenon. He, if we can use this pronoun for It, cannot commit itself to such engagements. That things is not here to become rich or famous or rule over the material world. It has a mission, as the enemy of humans, to eradicate the humanity. Not that to replace of something by bad things, but to substitute nothingness in place of beingness. He is enemy (of Messiah) by its nature and should concentrate all its activity towards fighting with Messiah. If It goes to politics, or acquiring wealth and power then people would become partitioned towards him as enemies or as friends. Then he would not be able to mobilize all the people but few, perhaps only one person left on the side of Messiah, as its mission is such a mobilisation. It is not the case that there is an Armageddon of usual armies to decide who wins who forfeit. Satan is extreme of slyness and treachery. When it becomes incarnated he can cheat "everybody" towards his chicanery. You have heard from teachings of religions that when God created man, all angels prostrated to submission to man but Satan, who said that it remains enemy to the man to the end. So Satan does not come to earth to buy and sell things or ask people to vote to him. He is friend with none. How such thing can happens in the material world. How can you find something who looks like a human and can communicate with humans (to urge them against Messiah) but do not engage in daily affairs of human. What power and specification it has that it can conduct such an Armageddon against the one man army of Messiah.

Anti-Christ is a real phenomenon in nature (2)

Still, there were arguments that mind is the same as brain. Rearrangements of molecules in their ultimate happens in the material brain. It is as you say proton is just concentration of energy. You say that, it is just three quarks attached to each other. That kind of reasoning means that you even do not believe that there is such thing as brain. RNA is just an aggregate of hydrogen carbon nitrogen and oxygen with few other elements. We might left in a hollow of "nihil." Then there is the "good news" that you cannot reason for "nihil." You hear the good news and you cannot ignore it because you have a mind that recognizes it without you can help it. And that holy creature, "mind" also reasons to keep you integrated in favour of a controversy, as, "there is only nihil." Hence, reasoning for "nihil" is equivalent to reasoning for mind. Good news is that you exist in-spite of your reasoning against it. You can keep your "cool status" while at the same time you are enjoying secretively as a member of "boring kids club" of those who are here to stay. Proton knows that it is a new entity. It is not concentration of energy. It is equivalent (please calculate it using physics of high school)to myriads units of energy of sunshine shining to myriads square kilo-meters of empty space but gathered in the smallest possible volume to create next stages of existence. Proton knows that it refuges other wandering entities (electrons) and decaying entities (neutrons), whom without him will not have any role in the nature, in a safe haven of a family which is the first stone of the foundation of higher stages of beingness in nature. He cannot ignore such a good news by reasoning that he is just another name for arrangement of three quarks.

Anti-Christ is a real phenomenon in nature

I already fully elaborated on the idea of a spectrum for natural phenomena. You observe something weak here then definitely you find its full-fledged happening somewhere else. You see this happens in a small scale then that can happen in a very large scale. I said, sometimes when you cannot find the whole spectrum in nature then human can create it artificially. Messiah and anti-Christ are also extreme of a phenomenon in nature that on a daily basis at any moment a human can experience in its mild and milder and mildest forms within himself and without  in the aggregate of humans in the society. To further preparation for the discourse man should refer to his "mind." Mind of a human is the most complex and end product of the nature. Well, I do not mean the "brain." Even the brain of very advanced primates is also somehow extreme of creation of nature. Sometimes, one might be deluded, when he is reading about black holes and quarks and gluon's and these things that what surprises they have and you might forget that the surprise is not in those basic, simple, very crude and primitive objects of nature. The surprise exists in the tool that observes, studies and analyses them; not the brain, the human mind. Before going further one could be too stiff in protesting that there is only brain and talking of mind means that I want to bridge the gap and jump into the world of metaphysics and leave the physics behind. I might do it but in future. For now, I am using only physics. We have two sets and one function from one to the other. One is nature and the other set is the set of results of action of physical brain on the nature. Brain is the function. Result or in mathematical term, "image" of this function is mind. You might say it is only arrangement and re-arrangement of molecules. Well, saying just that, is the mind, not the brain. Your mind says that clause, not your brain. Why is it physics. We should go back to the entities who are here to stay. First object we could find was the proton. It emerged from the creation as an entity that does not "want" to decay and annihilate except that you force it. Then we noticed crystals. They "want" to stack and fill the space in spite of the fact that to do that they have to swim upstreams against the tendency of the nature, surrounding them in whole, who pushes them back. "Then we had RNA who 'wants' to stay by creating a replica of himself. He believes if he needs himself when he is decaying then he is there by presence of the replica," said so Messiah when he was asked why we multiply. I called those surprising objects, black holes, quarks, gluons, basic since RNA already was in those stages and could not find those stages enough to stay at, and evolved and evolved, until he - RNA -  created the Paradise, the blue warm, wet, and friendly cradle for his own creation. Then he, I mean RNA, created water, methane, more complex chemicals. When everything was ready RNA was there. Then as he had aimed he started to put one back-up for him at each point on the earth. "I am everywhere and always here. Look, I am here. No, look at me I am here, no..here!" Then enemy could not decide which one is the original which one should be annihilated. Perhaps there is a mirror shattered in pieces and each is the beautiful face of Him, of the RNA? Enemy, the annihilator who presses the blue habitat from the above and from the below remained wandering in search of him forever. Shattered pieces of mirror carry the same and one thing. Each show the same face and when you put the jigsaw of the broken pieces together they show the same thing, an RNA who is here to stay. Those pieces are our minds and they are parts of our global mind jigsawed to make one. They are attached in unification but their projections  into our local time space seems separated and enemy is wandering forever which one to annihilate. The enemy is one who has not that picture. So he is in search of that picture. Leave this sweet fable for now. Wake up back to the physics such that in a dialectic of physics and "non-"physics you can start to believe that you are here to stay. You already know that how proton is so stable and how RNA created as a replicator. If you do not know and you are interested you can go to school and learn it. Here you learned "why." Therefore, we negotiated that there is our mind as the result of evolution. We add that we have evolved drastically from a time-space localisations of some primitive magma of energy into the protons and we passed crucibles after crucibles until RNA and then fights and survivals into the shape of a human. You know how we started to walk on our hind legs until we had to twist our face ninety degrees downwards to be able to see front of us instead watching the sky when walking on our legs. (That tendency remained in our eyes to look in the old direction into the sky.) See, in each stage, at each milestone with the big gap that exists between them a transformation happens. The universe of that entity changes. He leaves a universe behind him. Proton never decays, RNA lays many of him everywhere. It is natural that we extrapolate for another surprise, for another revolution in evolution. That surprise does not exist somewhere else that we start to create tools and labs to discover it. That, in its very natural expectation, is continuation of our existence. We are at the head of the arrow and we are going towards it, knowing or not knowing.