Can I Invest on Holes?

Psychoanalyst, correctly, has based its paradigm on the idea that these capsulated information bits and pieces, called complexes in their jargons, can be deciphered and opened and faced with by deep thinking to remember past memories and dreams. What was found wrong with psychoanalysis that it became deserted? I already discussed it. First, it became the tool of Hollywood and Satanism that is pervading modern societies. Second it was not followed and corrected by generations of people who should be as bright and innovative and original discoverer in the same level as its founder. Third it fell in the hands of pseudo-science and charlatans and started to be used to create generalised babbles to sooth and cheat and gather wealth and power. It created descriptions that almost every person with any personality could accept as his own description (these generalised descriptions are kind of keys that can be abused to open the inner sanctuary of humans for Satan, and has been used so). It helped to excite new frequencies for bad holes. See, you cannot say that internal combustion engines discovered but only few wealthy people could use its benefits and others mostly became hurt by it.

I talked about bad holes as if I have seen them and have taken their pictures. My propositions seems like what they call nominalism. I create a name and mount attributions on it. Then I believe it exists without being able to prove that the basic entity should exist at the first place. Again I remind you that I got the idea of holes from  the semiconductors; holes that I describe as the excitements in lattices of human societies fit comprehensively in those models similar to a pseudo-particle. I also mentioned similar abstractions useful for practical benefits that in theory defy the laws of nature. Such were an ideal band pass filter or a choke in electrical current, passing  into superconductivity and other second degree phase transformations in  material, existence of liquids that look like solid due to extreme viscosity. You need to assume an axiomatic entity and see if it fits your requirement, inclusively and excluding.

Again it comes where is Messiah in these arguments. Psychoanalyst, approached brilliantly to connect tumults of human soul with his societal behaviour and his religious, transcendental thoughts, perceptions and interpretations and among those phenomena we find claims of certain humans as being a messenger from a supreme, superior, divine being. However, having an atheist bias, due to the prejudices of the time that inhibited any assertion of such kind of investigations as blatantly dismissed and superstitious, psychoanalyst did not commit itself to further and deeper exploration of such realms.

Four Characteristics of Bad Holes

I try to engage further with psychoanalysis, without using their ideas. It is my own ideas but could coincide with theirs or use their type of discourse.
First characteristic of bad hole is that IT likes to talk with you. Its talk is not friendly. It talks as if it has got its authority from the god, or as if you are its slave or a child under its guardianship. It talks only to blame you as if you have done an unforgiveable sin. Remember, story of Adam and garden. Satan seduced man to something then god forgave man. If the sin was serious god would not forgive him. Seriousness of the sin is the blame that man receives from Satan. You can sort out things with god but you can't with Satan. You are from the material of god but you have not anything with Satan. Satan is like a shadow and you can't fight with a shadow. Bad hole means lack of something. It looks real since you are the real one.

Second, the bad hole tries to connect to your body and asserts itself. Bad hole has not a body and needs your body to move around and brings the dormant bad holes into the life such that in human society only bad holes move around and human succumbs to their overwhelming dominance and human race becomes annihilated.  Later we'll see if the bad holes can get enough soldiers they will annihilate the entire universe. That is a future proposition that we might infer from our arguments. Well, back to dance-floor, you might become ashamed not joining the boogie and that is a somatic condition triggered by the bad hole. When you are bashful, your body is passing a stage synchronising with state of your mind. Your mind is busy analysing the environment and planning strategies to attach to social lattice. It commands secretion of a modest amount of chemical to engage with situation. It is a good potion for the body. You have seen a four-year-old child  taken to a friend's house. At the beginning she is silent and "polite" and behaving, sitting in an armchair next to mum. You say that he is bashful. After an hour you have to leave the friend to take the child out before she demolishes your friend's house beyond any economical repair. Therefore, that shyness is part of human nature and fades upon reconnaissance of place . One is not sure if the visiting environment is friendly or hostile. It is not fear (which is a kind of shyness and vice versa). It is not a sin (again shyness). "God put me in this garden. I am not sure if that tree is something edible or poisonous. But, anyway, I am bashful to approach and examine. Let me wait for a while and then taste." And, after a couple of days, god has to take you out before you demolish the garden beyond any repair. At the point that you are bashful to examine, bad hole finds the opportunity to realise itself towards becoming existing. It compresses all the information of that point of the time-space-chemistry-etc. in a code, adds fear to it and save it somewhere for ITS own future reference. How can IT do that job? Where in nature you have seen that a chunk of information can be encapsulated? Yes, remember ants. The ant who returns from its search gets encapsulated information of the address of its colony from the coming ants and gives encapsulated information of address of the food to them: "Where is the queen?" and the other "Where is the food that you have found?" And we said, "Where is the path to brain?" and next door neuron or something asks, "Where is the point of burning?" When the ant gets to home it is yet another ant; he cannot remember where was the food. He only remember the address of colony. When signal of burning gets to brain then it is not burning anymore; it is a pain inside the brain

Third specification of the bad hole is that it creates dreams. When you are sleeping, you are rejuvenating your body. Your mind allows your body to sort out itself and make up for sufferings you have received during the day. Your mind allows its slave to rest. Primitive man in nature had another way of sleeping. Modern man should wake up and connect with and check the environment every ninety minutes. That is similar to the point that you were bashful. You are excited to face the arena. It is deeper than entering your friend's and chemicals are more readily available for the bad hole to jump. Your mind does not accompany you as coordinated as should be. While you are in preparation, the bad hole makes your cognition full of the scattered points of bashfulness capsules.

Last characteristic is that the bad hole, upon acquiring certain level of control over you, starts to talk with people. IT completely overpower you in many arenas of activity where IT has got its keys to switch you off.

On Suffering of Jesus Christ and Flood

People say that Romans nailed the wrists of Jesus Christ to the cross and this was the suffering of the 'Son of the God'; he even did not die. He survived the cross! People also attribute to Jesus a lot of useless knowledge of every preacher that one should be kind with his neighbours and give a coin to beggars and so on. Accordingly, this is all that Jesus suffered for the stupid sin of someone (Adam) who lost easy life of paradise to hunger and death on the earth. And he did that for a humble apple, and it was because his wife intrigued him. What was the tool of the wife for intriguing? Before eating the apple they were not aware of the sexual organ of each other; peacefully were next to each other naked without noticing that they were naked. They even were not aware that they had that organ, let alone use it for intriguing or become intrigued. When there is no other man or woman around and no sexual life then what is the meaning of intriguing? Why human being needs such a nonsense story for generations and so vehemently embrace such a myth? You might say that it is symbolic. Then go and ask Pop or archbishops, or ayatollahs or rabies or Dalai Lama what is the meaning of the symbol. Do they know? No, only Jesus knows. In Roman Empire even a wealthy person could crucify his chef if the chef could not provide prestigiously for his special banquets, without any court or answering anybody. Every week Roman authorities crucified scores of people mostly innocent who had little children and were thirsty and had half grey beards and looked very humble in talking and demeanour.
In the stories we read that Noah had eight hundred years time to convince people that a flood would come and take them with, and Noah would be safe and  had the know-how to tell them how they could survive safely by joining to him. He received harassment and mockery and almost nobody joined to him and a lot of other unbelievable things such as flooding the earth to the top of highest mountains and taking all the animals to a humble one-man-made do-it-yourself ship. You say it is a nonsense fable, or it is a symbolic story about fights of human being against the nature. Your reasons are feasibility and possibility and so on. Why for many thousands years people have accepted this story? You say that they are fanatics. Well, why do they depict people of Noah's time so intellectual and objective? Why not those people were fanatics? Why they were not simpletons and scary and start to pray and beg Noah to do something for them to save them? They were intellectuals and asked Noah for hard evidence such as some satellite pictures and data and atmospheric models, but after them people lost their wisdom and started to believe in retrospect that such things had actually happened and they did not enquire for any evidence. Moreover, situation became reversed and non-believers became object of harassment and mockery.

My story is like that. No one will believe it as much as I try to write it down and expand it even in eight hundred years.

Stories of Messengers Become More Realistic

We concluded that as we were moving towards more recent events of history and human became more rigorous in writing and recording of events, messengers of the God also became less supernatural in behaviour and their lives became recorded as the life of ordinary people. The last one established himself among the people and part of his mission covered ordinary administration of a society.

If you read history, the life of Muhammad very carefully has been recorded. What he has left behind has been divided in two parts: one part, based on his own instruction is from God and is collected as a holy book sent from the God, and all of his followers have consensus on every detail of that. Another part of his legacy his followers quote from him as an ordinary person talking from his own intelligence and in many occasions his followers have controversy about.

Read stories of ordinary people who were not prophet and are known as saints and similar entities, living after Muhammad until very recent eras. Still, there are fables attributing strange things to them not attributed to Muhammad. In the Muhammad's holy book, except for his journey to Jerusalem over one night, there is nothing to be interpreted as Muhammad being supernatural being or has done as a supernatural feat; in contrast in any occasion it is emphasized that he was an ordinary human but with a mission. That assertion does not end to Muhammad alone. His book also extends that to other messengers who came before him.

What is the rational inference of this chronology. It is that the positivist philosophy seems to come around. When humans become more scientific they become less superstitious, less believing in supernatural phenomena. It shows that we can reach to the conclusion that prophets before Muhammad also were similar. It is not possible that Moses becomes endowed with such a convincing power and can sink an army chasing him into the sea, but God deprived his son of being able to overpower three soldiers who came and arrested him. As details about Muhammad have been written clearly he completely followed rules of ordinary conflicts and tactics in his campaigns. Sometimes defeated, sometimes won.

What I want to say is that if we say the messengers were supernatural beings it is similar to saying pyramids were built by jennies and ghouls and aliens from other planets not by project managers and geometricians and calculating people. It is similar to saying that man has not capacity to build such a colossal monuments and man has not the capacity to receive the message of god.

Now read history of Muhammad; parts which are not written as the holy book. We read that he talked with people. He invited people for dinner and he invited people to believe. He went to different places and asked them to believe. People stoned him and insulted him without he being able to convince them or stop them. He led some wars and instructed his army to such and such. Everything was absolutely earthly.

Let's go back a few century and go to the time of Jesus Christ. There are similar stories about him. He travelled from this place to other place and talked and invited people and it is said that he faced a court, a trial. Story of that court has been told millions of time during the centuries. It shows defence of an earthly skilled lawyer who foil an unjust prosecutor. The Roman, as it is said, washed his hand. That was correct and meant that in his soul he could not reach  to a legal verdict against Christ. Consider that Romans had a sophisticated administration and lawyers were part of their cultivation; for instance Cicero was a famous lawyer. Romans were familiar with defendants who could thwart government prosecutors by pointing out the right precedence and written laws.

That will eliminate the need to add thunder bolts and lightning to the story.

Religion Is Abstraction

I frequently reiterate that I am not one who wants to preach any of the existing religions. I am not one who wants to prove that any of the existing religions is actually consistent with the modern science or modern psychology, or modern politics and is good for the well being and moral behaviour though they look superstitious and old fashioned. I do not want to prove that modern life is analytic and people should have a synthetic soul and should escape from the maddening tumult and lust of their environment in cities to comfort and peace of religions in the convents and monasteries and meditate.
No, I want to say that religion is not religion. Pyramids supposedly were built as being very big tombstones for a wealthy and powerful person as the symbol of his religion. And archaeologists go there and clean bones with a fine brush and sit there for years to find a piece of charcoal. For me it shows practical people sitting together, calculating, knowing materials, managing workforce, and defending projects to sponge more money from the king for their wild imaginations. It means they knew formulas of trigonometry. They were true when they told the king that with such a project he would be resurrected. They were true when they said that the king needed all those paraphernalia when he would resurrect. He needs the golden mask to be recognised as with his real face as a king. They were true that he needed those paintings and writings on the walls with servants and ministers and story of his daily life when he should be resurrected. They were not fools to put stones on top of the stones because of their wrong stupid idea of resurrection of their king.
Now listen to people who were descendants of builders of those pyramids and were living millenniums after those builders. They had all kinds of stories about those pyramids such as being built by monsters and jennies and such; couldn't believe their great great grandfathers were in that capacity they attribute to monsters. Even in modern times some people said that man could not build such colossal buildings. They say that those were built by aliens from other worlds. They say that those were built by whipping slaves. You can gather not slaves, but a million of paid workers and start to shout at them to build a mound of dirt and then go and come back after a year and see if anything has been done. But, we have Euclid who could make an elegant abstraction out of those builders' rough ideas; abstractions that did not include monsters and aliens and slaves.
In the similar way we have other types of stories such as a garden and a married couple and a mesmerising snake who could defy the sanctuary of god and could tempt the woman to eat from a forbidden tree. What is its abstraction? Here, a most dreadful animal for human becomes tempting. Why that thing should not come in a more presentable form?
Then we get to the story of a flood that covers all the earth since in a village a group of people were making fun of a crazy person who was building a ship far from any water in the middle of the desert. This is more acceptable story than the tempting snake.
Then Abraham's and after him Moses' gradually become more acceptable: There is no tempting snake and Sweden will not become flooded for the sin of a village in the Middle East.
Until we get to story of Jesus Christ which includes even less supernatural events. Still, he has some strange arts such as converting water to expensive wines but people kill him instead of making a profitable business out of him. When it gets to Muhammad it becomes so realistic that "Muhammad goes to mountain if mountain does not come to him." Then people know very detailed account of his time and day to day life of him.
What is the abstraction of these. You might say that it is enough since you can guess that I am going to paraphrase them as symbols of something earthly. No, remember, Euclidean geometry is abstraction of the facts and by itself it is divine. It is not earthly

Mind Reader, Holes, and Psychoanalyst

We were talking about the holes in the semiconductors, then we promised to connect it to psychoanalysis. Then we jumped on the dance floor until we got to the shy person who was not groovy and we said that we relate it to psychoanalysis. Another leap took us to the mind reader in the ancient societies. What is the synthesis of camel, cow, and leopard; a giraffe? We have seen holes in the semiconductors actually exist; they are not a convenience. A hole is an extra positive charge, but if you examine a piece of semiconductor its total charge is zero; it is neutral. Dance floor analogy is also quite convincing.

But the mind-reader has not any precedence in our knowledge, or in preachers language and teaching of religions. You might say, "Enough; existence of such a thing as a mind-reader seems pure delusion!"

We said that when we look at natural phenomena we should look at a spectrum of each phenomenon. We should look at the continuity of that in evolution. We should see what has changed a fish to a crocodile. What has changed a fish to a dove. What has changed a crocodile plus dove to a horse and what has changed a horse to an ape and ape to human and what will be the next stage. The next stage should be searched inside the human evolution. Human is the tip of the arrow. That does not mean that evolution of fish has been stopped. Human evolution is vertically upward, but laterally we can see very shocking events. There is a type of fish living in pitch dark caves, where even a gleam of light cannot be seen for thousand and thousands of years. They look like a trout. They are actually trouts, but that they have not eyes. They have eyes in the same place that a trout has, but as if they have eyelids and they have closed their eyelids. They do not need seeing, hence they have lost their eyes as being a redundant item. They eat and reproduce and play and jump up and down and find their ways around and defend themselves without being able to see. Trees are green and human's eye is most sensitive to green light and bulk of the energy of the Sun radiates in green.

What is the state of hydrogen in the centre of the sun where temperature is hundred million degrees and pressure is so immense. Is it a metallic hydrogen and it creates energy in cold fusion actually?  If one can push hydrogen atoms , that is protons, under immense pressure next to each other protons might fuse together only due to population not due to temperature and a cold fusion could happen. Neutron stars are so dense that electrons have been fused into the protons and made a whole neutron object. But surprisingly they have a magnetic poles like earth and more surprisingly some have been observed with four magnetic poles. Magnetic poles of earth are due to its iron core. Where the neutron star magnetic poles come from as there is no element inside them but pure neutron? How two magnets remain in some type of stability next to each other?

All these surprises are based on some evidence. How the postulate of a mind reader is supported by any evidence. They even do not exist in our religious teaching. I asserted that Antichrist is a mind reader. Antichrist has been mentioned as the enemy of Jesus Christ as the Satan embodied in form of human. But there is no mention of such a capacity about Antichrist as being a mind reader.

You should note that some ideas have been the consequence of a brave postulate inferred from previous observations not inferred from existing evidences.

You should note that great pyramids were not built by knowing Euclidean geometry; centuries before Euclid. In their buildings their designers used all the Euclidean geometry but they had not a clue of such a beautiful abstraction as the Euclidean geometry.

You should note that Babylonians and many other nations all around the earth could predict lunar and solar eclipse, length of the year, time of equinox and solstice without knowing the theory of Ptolemy; centuries before Ptolemy.

But the other way is correct. Euclid and Ptolemy abstracted and inferred what they had seen from Egyptian buildings and Babylonians astronomy among other things.

We hope we can infer such a creature from the stories that have passed to us, from observation of primitive religions such as druids, and shamans and from more familiar teachings of modern (I mean Judaism, Christianity, and Islam) religions, and besides, from the psychoanalyst theories.

Antichrist is the mind reader: Part one

See, mind-reader comes in a society and tells them that he has a certain unbelievable art. People can behold that he has not hooves, or horns, or fiery eyes or claws or fangs. He looks completely like any of them. They ask what is his art. He says that he can read mind of an individual who is living among them. After now I call that individual the targeted victim or just the victim.

At first they believe he is a magician or something and wants to hustle them. Perhaps he wants to become rich. Perhaps he wants to become their king or chieftain. Perhaps he wants beautiful women. Perhaps he wants to live in ease and luxury in their king's palace or in the great temple. Perhaps he wants fame, respect, and honour in the society. No; surprisingly, he does not want any of those. He only wants to use this art for a great goal that is also of demand of their society in exchange of nothing. Not for nothing but for a charitable goal to help the society and that individual. The targeted society does not believe.

They ask him what is his unbelievable art. He says that he knows everything about that individual. He knows every detail of his childhood. He knows his friends. He even knows what he is eating or drinking right now. Whom he loves. Whom he hates. Even what he sees in his dream and what the victim can remember from his past dreams. He says that he can induce dreams into the mind of the targeted victim. People do not believe such a story. Many of them are magicians and know all these tricks but it does not look like any of their arts. They assume perhaps the victim is a confederate of the mind-reader. But no one, near to the victim or far from him have ever seen the victim with this mind-reader. Perhaps the mind reader wants boot-licking the victim. There has been no friendship no kinship or congruity between these two.  But the victim, himself is a humble person of no special recognition in the society. Those who know the victim recognise that every detail that the mind-reader claims about the victim is correct.

Perhaps, he has watched the life of the victim for a long time. But they ask themselves that one usually do these things for some material gain, for fame, for honour. Why should the mind-reader watch the victim, an ordinary person,  for a long time and then who has provided for sustaining of such a watch for the mind-reader? First the mind-reader should convince a benefactor for his art then commit himself for watching or investigating somebody else's life. They arrange tests to examine the truth of his claims. They send people impromptu to the victim and talk with him.

On the other side, far from them, the mind-reader tells every detail of the conversation; every move of the conversant. They ask the victim what he has dreamt last night. He remembers them lucidly as exactly as it is planned by the mind-reader. People become mesmerised by such an art. They ask him what he wants. They take him to their ruler, to their highest priests. At first these people also cannot believe until they become convinced and mesmerised. They become convinced that the mind-reader does not want anything they grudge for other people such as wealth, power and such.

The mind-reader does not ask any inconvenience from them. What if the victim rebels and attack their churches and palaces. The mind-reader convince them that such things need planning. When the victim plans for them, he becomes aware and immediately people overpower him. If the victim decides to approach certain people and become confederate with them, beforehand they inform the potential confederates. Mind-reader's only request is the total access to the victim.

Why? What is the benefit of such an absurd total access for the ruler, priests and people.

Now, mind-reader looks to the society texture. If they believe in devil ghosts, he says that the victim is occupied by those ghosts and the victim might help the ghosts to overcome their society. If the society believes that they like to hear the voice of their ancestors to help them into the heavens, then the mind-reader says that he can adjust the victim as a medium to hear those voices and when the victim hears those voices the mind-reader also can hear and will tell them. If the society believes there is a way to live an eternal life, the mind-reader says that by watching gradual death of the victim they can discover the secret of eternal life. If the victim is an illegitimate child, say, like Jesus Christ according to his enemies, the mind-reader claims that he helps the society to clean that foul.

But, wait a minute. If the mind-reader can so perfectly knows about the victim, perhaps king or one of his entourage also can learn this art and read the mind of neighbour kings and conquer all the world, but on the condition that they also do not become aware of existence of such art. Great priest has his own dreams. He knows that he has no real power in connection with god or gods or evils and his rituals are void, fake plays to cheat people and for satisfaction of his greed and lust. If he only partially can learn this art and keep it in his secret rings and descendants, then he can cheat thousands and thousands instead of the small population of his fanatics.

Is not the mind of human the ultimate fruit of the entire nature from big-bang and black holes and galaxies and quarks and planets; all worked, until their product can think?

What should that society do in return for such a charity that makes the mind-reader happy as he asks nothing that they have. The mind-reader tells them if he asked one of them inflict a pain to the victim they should obey. But, if the victim dies or be killed the art of the mind-reader remains unfinished and inconsequential. King should give time to the mind-reader to make the king able to harness and use that art for his own goals. Priest should have enough time to learn that art.

No; no killing or fatal injury is intended - mind reader assures them. They should use words to inflict pain on the victim. They should keep the victim harassed, isolated, sanctioned, hopeless, in twilight of death and life, confined as if buried alive, suspended as if on the cross, always looking to see the light at the end of the tunnel but desperate of such glimmer, living but dying, dying but living, deprived of any kindness, deprived of love, affection and sympathy, deprived of validity, deprived of conversation, earning bread, reproducing.

There is only one small obstacle on the way. That is, the victim does not agree with this scheme. He does not want to be sacrificed on the altar of mind-reader. He wants to go around and talk with people and socialise with them. He wants to live his own life; not the life destined for him by the mind-reader. He might protest. He might attack to the maddening annoying crowd. He might punch people to death out of spontaneity and the ruler cannot ignore the blood-shed and relatives of the dead might betray the whole plot.

The first thing that the mind-reader does ask to be done is to intimidate the victim by accusing the victim as being a rebel under persecution of the ruler, under the threat of being executed by the ruler for his crimes against the state.

The origin of ruling a society is the erection of phallus of the ruler. That has sublimated generations after generation in the mind of human as fear from the ruler, from the king, from disobedience to “law,” fear of regicide. It has been sublimated into offering yourself and succumb into a compromising position for the (sexual) gratification and fulfilment of the ruler and his demands. In this way the mind reader locks the manhood of the victim into his own possession.  

This is the first element of Satanic ritual of sacrificing man.

The victim knows that human society is not the colony of ants and bees. Not all men are created to think and obey unison in consensus even on the smallest unimportant matters. Inside a house a wife with his husband quarrel for the colour of curtain. How is it possible that a wide society all agree on his suffering even if the most sacred and important matters be at stake.

Holes Are Real!

If you are too shy they are like real partners; they are groovy and they do not like to mix with shy people. Another hole comes to you ask you to sit in a corner and talk together. You talk with something that does not exist out there. Or, rather, something that does not exist out there talks with you. It is your choice you can go and dance with them or sit and converse. Well, there are plenty of holes around to mix with. Remember that holes are as real as you. I did not mean allegory or symbolism. They need two factors to be realised. First a single individual and then an excited environment. You can arrange the ballroom with uniformed people and similar caps such that pictures taken from the ceiling do not reveal their sex and their individual features. From the left door enters a single; immediately from the right door enters a hole. You can take picture that he or she snatches the first partner at the side and left alone partner of the snatched dancer takes his next door dancer until at the other end, at the left door, a singled out partner becomes kicked out of the salon by the bouncer. When you enter as a single in the dancing room you already bring some discomfort with you as an excitement into the room, but this is not enough. Further excitement will come with the music. I had to add this small post to emphasise that the holes are real and as physically observable as humans in such an arrangement. They are actually invisible humans, perhaps a little heavier, if all the individuals in the room have equal shape and weight in a thought experiment.

Causality and the Holes?

I said that the holes on the dance floor break causality of events. It means that before stimulation comes response is there (do not confuse it with the response in anticipation of stimuli, which is actually causal). This might make you surprised since you know causality the most sacred knowledge of human. Even if you say there are experiments that break causality you implicitly have acknowledged causality. Those experiments are cause of the knowledge you get from the experiment. But wait a minute. We know that a low-pass filter, say in your radio, an ideal low pass filter breaks the causality. To have an ideal low pass filter your system should be turned on from infinite time ago; should be turned on before you switch it on. Hence, it is not realisable. You cannot build an ideal low pass filter and even if you build the best digital radio, there always will be some noise mingled with the desired signal that you like to listen to, because the filters are not ideal at all. You can make a good filter but not an ideal one. We have a saying that "he is so groovy that dances before the music plays." Holes are that groovy. They are dancing before the guest enters the dancing room. They are there grooving and when the individual with no partner enters they attach to him. They wait until the environment becomes excited. They attach to you with the speed of infinity. This is their second breach of nature's law. It is believed that nothing can move faster than light. Well, some say that when you think about a galaxy one million light years away your thought flies with speeds much faster than the light. It is an allegory. You have that information in your mind and you retrieve it very fast; perhaps with the speed of light, and we do not know more than that. But the hole gets information of your presence and that you are a left-alone immediately; with speed of infinity. You cannot decide if the hole is already in the salon or it joined to you in the parking or if it was with you before any time from infinite time ago. Holes become your dancing partner if the environment becomes exited not when it is gelid. If you are too shy they are like real partners they do not come to you. Another hole comes to you ask you to sit in a corner and talking together. This bridges the holes to the psychoanalysis that I have selected as the name of this site.

More on Holes and on Dance Floor

You know the room is full of holes waiting to grab an unpaired individual, when excited. I said that already: One individual enters the party without his couple accompanying him. He has left alone. All couples are dancing. He is watching. Until the music becomes more exciting and more groovy, then couples "coupling" becomes loose and also the lone boy becomes excited towards rugged edge of the dancing people and grabs the next girl at the edge nearest to him. The girl's partner grabs one from the inner crowd and so on. We said, assume at the same time a lone girl enters from the diagonally opposite door and starts the same process. We said each one has got an opposite sex hole with them. Therefore we have two holes in the room: one girl and one boy. We said we can actually arrange experiments to take picture from them. We said they are not as groovy as others but a bit sluggish. And there will be a point in the middle that they reach together. Now all people are paired. What happens to our hole couples? They go and sit on chairs at a corner waiting if new singled out individual arrives. They have not names. They are not invited. They do not know how to dance. They do not have any acquaintances in the crowd. They do not have a body of flesh materialised. They are just nobody. They just wait for a lonely individual and an excited dance floor to start to groove. How many of them exists? There is no difference. Holes do not exist at all. You can say, many pairs, or just one or just none, until the floor becomes degenerated: If you invite fifty couple and forty of them come singled then with no genre of musics you are able to excite the dance floor.

Man in Panopticon

I have written frequently that my aim is not to prove the god and religion by using science. Modern science and the idea of god and religion as we know them are contradictory. I said that I do not mean that the idea of god is good for the psychological benefits of human and giving him comfort and insight for his daily behaviour or inspire and frighten him towards a better moral behaviour. Everything that you claim is so vast and vaguely understood by man that excludes me to commit. Each claim goes into the realm of dedicated scholarships of individuals and groups of people. Why should god sends his son or a messenger who has a very partial knowledge of human affairs let alone to help them to eternal salvage. Messiah only brings some news and some people could only believe him and mostly people could not believe except by conversion, by a sudden transformation of soul. I have shown the contradictory nature of these two discourse: science and religion. Hence, what is all that about the excitons and psychoanalysis? I want to show that there are things that are conceivable. I want to show that the idea of god and Satan is in the spectrum of human thoughts without creating a contradiction or using glib of preachers in bypassing and jumping over those contradictions. I want to show that if modern science tries in denying my argument it similarly has to jump and bypass its own contradictions. In this way I'll be able to demonstrate a unified outlook. Exciton is something in a spectrum - spectrum of artificial elements -  that has been created in a very unusual conditions. It is part of the nature but man cannot find it in the nature. On the other hand, I want to show that an instance of the language has been created by the modern man that puts locks and knots on the human mind and when the man tries to open it, that instance overpower the human mind and converts it to a new lock and knot such that when man believes that he is opening and opening he is sealing and locking and knotting. He makes the wall around his individuality thicker and thicker and imprison him in a prison that there is no escape for him but it is crystal clear and hurdle-less for intrusion of Satan and inflicting of pain, misery and hopelessness upon man. I want to show that we modern humans cannot and are not allowed to communicate with each other and when we do it, Satan assertively and immediately outreaches to us to punish us. This is the panopticon that some recent humans have recognised as the last retreat of humans into his loneliness.

Excitons and Psychoanalyst (2)

First, allow me to discuss exciton in nature. When you dope some impurity in a semiconductor material, inside the crystal structure of that material you can create an additional electron coupled with a lack of electron (a positive hole). They act like a Hydrogen atom: Hole is a light weight positive charge with a mass a little more than  mass of an electron. You can create many of these atoms. All modern electronics and lasers and LED's are working on this basis. There is a hope that you can create such an immense concentration of Excitons to turn them into a metallic form similar to metallic hydrogen. (Hydrogen is actually a metal with properties similar to lithium and sodium, but it shows those physical metalic properties, such as electrical conduction, under unbelievable pressure to keep its atom in a metallic structure.) Then there is a hope that you can increase concentration of doping to degenerate that metal into a superconductor (similar to super-conducting high temperature metallic hydrogen ); a superconductor inside a semiconductor. In that case it is possible to manufacture computer parts that do not need cooling and can work with a torch battery. They do it, though in fifty years. Then what is a hole in our ball room party? It does not exist on the dance floor as far as all dancers are paired. When there comes an unpaired individual, the dance floor becomes a little excited due to that presence, but not enough to create an Exciton, as far as the dance lattice remains stiffed due to a calm music. It should become excited by applying a more exciting music to the environment. When an unpaired individual enters then a hole is created. What is that? It is an effect due to presence of an unpaired one. It becomes created with speed of infinity (in nature we do not have speed more than speed of light, but that hole defies that postulate). It is non-causal: Hole is there before its cause enters the room. It is not the matter. It is somewhere. It is a spirit. You know the room is full of holes waiting to grab an unpaired individual, when excited.

Excitons and Psychoanalyst

In older posts, I described briefly about some modern observations in nature of chemical elements. I talked about anti-matter and artificial elements and nonperceivable elements such as muoniums. I left out one important case and that is the exciton. This element is created when nothingness becomes excited! It exists but in twilight of existence. What is the use of such thing in the nature. All you see right now in screen of your computer is due to such existence. Assume you are inviting equal numbers of girls and boys to a school ball. You expect people become paired when the band plays a cheek-to-cheek. what happens if a girl or a guy does not get their invitation card on-time. You are lacking a coupling place; some one remains alone. If you make the environment excited enough by changing the music to a more modern rhythm, the lonely person can snatch his/her couple from a pair and makes the other partner alone. The left alone individual can do the same with the nearest couple and this can create an additional observable commotion rippling over the dancing motions of people. There is an empty place for one missed individual but it seems as filled by the excitement. You can say one person is dancing with a bubble, with a "hole!" There is a couple there created by excitation, compensating the absent guest.They look as a natural couple similar to others. This "hole" dancer only is a bit more heavier and sluggish than all other dancers in turning and bending and other motions. You can create senarios and by taking snap shots from above the dance floor calculating weight of this invisible dancer. You can 'inject' a spare partner from opposite door of the ball room until two single dancers meet up in the centre of the room, the hole gets filled. Suddenly, all will have their partners, shout in relaxation and the excitement fades out; many scenarios, just "gedanken." The couple might win the fruit basket of the best dancers of the night and the umpire calls the "exciton couple" as the winner. Remains where is psychoanalysis in this discussion?

Original Sin? (2)

 We understood that the only sin is the creation in an arena that everything is hostile to the creation. Everything is dying. Everything is destroying to the most delicate of all: the life. That hostility remains accompanying and chasing, intriguing the ascending being towards descend and annihilation. It is a wound, not healing ever, left back. It remains as a whisper in the ear, in the mind, in the existence of the upwardness of creation. It looks for a lapse for a wink to overcome and take everything back. It accumulates more and more when creation soars higher and higher. That is the pain. It happens that that pain falls on the shoulder of man with all of its heaviness. It is offered to heavens. It is offered to mountains. None accept. They say we draw lot whom his name comes out he carries it. But then they cheat. They write on all  the ballots only one name; only Messiah's name. And when they draw the lot it comes to Messiah to carry it. It is the cross that Messiah carries. Son of God, man, sacrifices for the sake of creation. He tolerate all the pains of the wound that He has created in creation. He tolerates for the original sin of man - original sin of God - creation. And Antichrist remains in the back fallen and defeated again dying and burning in his jealousy of witnessing the creation and evolving of the human mind.

Why Psychoanalyst? (2)

Psychoanalysis is a human achievement and supposedly is very materialistic and takes god from the arena of human life and knows other factors affecting human destiny. First, I said that I am talking with modern human and his modern mind in modern words. I am empty of any religion. All cults and religions and ideas existing at this time are part of career of a group of people and they are not for connection to the God. People who consume those products might benefit or might use it as some remedies for their daily pains but at the end they might become confused of inherent contradictions of those teachings with their modern mind. I already used some facts and findings of modern mind such as proton and RNA and muonium to navigate ahead. But I have used the psychoanalyst for my Blog and my web site names. I use this similarly for navigation only, until it remains the truth with its shininess. Second, this word, psychoanalyst, and part of its methods of interpretation of the human soul have been subjected to abuse by any type of preachers from its own discipline of psychology to every domain of day to day life of humans. Normally, I do not mention any name, since I am not writing any science here to cite names of discoverers and scientists. As psychoanalysis has huge impact on and blurring boundaries with religion I have to talk a paragraph about it. I did not write such a paragraph, say, about proton because people have been so frightened by modern science to interfere, or doubt about that modern ecclesiastical. Hence, they take it granted and I could move smoothly in that part. When it comes to the soul of humans, then everybody has a firm idea that cannot be disputed and he could abuse words in expanding anything from any beginning proposition to any ending proposition. Psychoanalysis established with vast discoveries about human soul at the beginning of twentieth century similar to modern physics. Its difference with modern physics was that, after its founder, it was not guarded by the same zeal as modern physics and it did not enjoy to be flourished and ramified with equal ingenuity of minds compareable to the founder of psychoanalysis, similarly. As the flow of science started to move towards the new world, it soon married with money and became arena of banality. Media used it to promote consumption of sex products. Governments and politics used it to opiate people with a scientific-like reasoning. Preachers and mushrooming cults used it to preach any idea. It became the language of generalised non-sense that can be interpreted by the audience individual suppositions. Until now that, everyday millions of  words are pushed into the minds of humans as the pshychoanalyst insights. Gradually it is becoming the tool of Satan for corrupting the language of human, The Words. Humans, making their tower towards the heaven towards reaching to the God and bringing him down, become corrupted in the language and they lose communications with each other ever increasingly.

Original Sin

Hence, god made a "mistake" who created man and Satan rebelled. Then why religions are obsessed with the original sin of the man? Because it is wrongly understood. Satan appears in the arena at the same point that man appears on the stage. Satan is interwoven with human. Son of the God should pay back for the original sin of man. But it is supposed that the Son is a different entity from the man and He should pay for him. God sacrifices His own Son for the sin of man. Already Abraham should sacrifice his son for a promise to God. God had asked him to do such a sacrifice. But later god sent the angel to inform Abraham that it had been just a test of his faith and obedience towards the god. We are on the track of discovery of an old, an ancient story but otherwise a wisdom, a wisdom of the past by putting pieces of time tormented puzzle together. We have to figure out what could be the parts that we have not found but actually existed at the dawn of human civilisation in its recent and more sophisticated form. What man saw at that time that he recorded in this way, and it is full of inspiration for all humans on the earth through the history. Why so many passionate heads climb voluntarily on the gallows of history to defend different forms of this story without asking a reward and they become the most admired characters remaining on the hearts of humans century after century. Messiah says, "There is no original sin committed by man. It is 'mistake' of god in creation of man that has been interpreted wrongly as the sin of man." When you cut a piece of marble from the mountain to create a statue its empty place remains as a sin in the mountain; by chiseling out each piece that sin becomes greater. Your sin remains in the form of geometry of the created piece to the end of time. Your sin accompanies the beauty of  your creation. The hollow in the mountain screams to take your creation back and that hollow remains there as a wound. They both appear at the same point and intertwine together. The hollow seduce the beauty all the time and frighten him of going back to shapelessness that he had. RNA comes into the world not by the fear of hunger but by the fear that it has not a backup in the world if he suffers annihilation. Hence he creates himself again and again. He takes chemicals from the world and leaves hollow in their place. He weaves them like the most perfect artist, perfect with the whole meaning of the perfection. He weaves them with not even a slightest difference into his own form, by watching his beautiful face in the mirror of space-time and puts them in a corner of the gallery. This exhibition gallery is full of similar artworks, in shape, form and colors and shadings, but in the eyes of beholder who is the only lonely guest there, all are consummate of artifacts; all are masterpieces in splendour. Up is freezing cold and lacking the chemicals for the sculptor. Down is hot and molten. He occupies diligently, all that is possible to occupy, to the deepest down and to the highest up and extends the dominion of his creation. He is here to stay.